Modifié par rafalima, 12 juin 2013 - 04:59 .
BasilKarlo wrote...
My first thought was that it's a child's body because of how small the head is.
I don't like that theory, it's obviously faulty.
Im thinking a kid or an elf.Commander Kurt wrote...
Well, summer just started in ernest here and with no hope of substantial info for months to come.. Just, thanks to all of you for contributing to this little corner of crazy. It's been good fun!BasilKarlo wrote...
My first thought was that it's a child's body because of how small the head is.
No...
TheBlackAdder13 wrote...
ElitePinecone wrote...
Mary Kirby @BioMaryKirby
How did it take me this long to realize there is a copy of Hard In Hightown 2 on the table in the #DAI trailer? Cassandra, we have to talk.
David Gaider @davidgaider
@BioMaryKirby What's a little light reading between sieges?
Haha oh man, that's hilarious. Does that mean that room was in the Hawke Estate? I thought we weren't going back to Kirkwall?
Modifié par res27772, 12 juin 2013 - 09:47 .
ElitePinecone wrote...
TheBlackAdder13 wrote...
ElitePinecone wrote...
Mary Kirby @BioMaryKirby
How did it take me this long to realize there is a copy of Hard In Hightown 2 on the table in the #DAI trailer? Cassandra, we have to talk.
David Gaider @davidgaider
@BioMaryKirby What's a little light reading between sieges?
Haha oh man, that's hilarious. Does that mean that room was in the Hawke Estate? I thought we weren't going back to Kirkwall?
It looked as if she was outside, in front of some sort of Seeker fortress with an unnerving large eye statue. (Perhaps Lambert's faction?)
DomRod95 wrote...
Im thinking a kid or an elf.
Commander Kurt wrote...
DomRod95 wrote...
Im thinking a kid or an elf.
Elf is fine. Let's go with elf.
TheLittleTpot wrote...
Commander Kurt wrote...
DomRod95 wrote...
Im thinking a kid or an elf.
Elf is fine. Let's go with elf.
Noooooooo~! Merril!
Guest_BarbarianBarbie_*
ElitePinecone wrote...
It could be, for example, that they've just got [random dead body asset #2] from some other scene, added a flame effect then put Varric walking in. For all we know he's just there to show the "wow there's a war going on" vibe.
ElitePinecone wrote...
TheLittleTpot wrote...
Commander Kurt wrote...
DomRod95 wrote...
Im thinking a kid or an elf.
Elf is fine. Let's go with elf.
Noooooooo~! Merril!
Allan Schumacher has suggested that the scenes in the trailer aren't necessarily representative of anything that's in the game - it was made by people going into the engine and manipulating assets/characters/etc. It's not necessarily showing cutscenes or events that are definitely going to happen, so all the speculation about who the bodies are could be for nothing.
It could be, for example, that they've just got [random dead body asset #2] from some other scene, added a flame effect then put Varric walking in. For all we know he's just there to show the "wow there's a war going on" vibe.
Reznore57 wrote...
http://social.biowar...x/16835776&lf=8
From Allan :
"Our trailer was "in engine" in that, it was DA3 assets placed inside the Frostbite engine within existing DA3 levels, and people loading up the game and moving around the camera, creating cinematic sequences, and the like, for the intent of capturing a video for demonstration.
If you were to draw the closest analogue to what the trailer was, it'd be the in game cinematics from DAO and DA2. The only hesitation one might put on "in game" is that upon playing the game at release, someone might go "Hey, where's that scene of the Qunari slowly turning around? I didn't see that in my game!" You might not see a scene that actually has Cassandra stabbing daggers into tables, and you might not come across a scene where Varric is looking over some dead bodies."
Allan Schumacher wrote...
I don't feel we abandoned "show, not tell" (everything you saw was created with our tools and represents assets we intend to put into the game. That IS Varric's model, that is how Morrigan looks in game - these things may change with iteration, but the demo was also about helping us establish our visual target internally). The rain running down the Qunari's face actually exists in the engine (and I have seen the Inquisitor get all nice and shiny from the rain as I run around the level that that Qunari was placed in for the trailer). If you're of the assumption that this was the equivalent of a Blur trailer, and not using game assets, then your assumption is incorrect.
Modifié par ElitePinecone, 12 juin 2013 - 05:07 .
Reznore57 wrote...
http://social.biowar...x/16835776&lf=8
From Allan :
"Our trailer was "in engine" in that, it was DA3 assets placed inside the Frostbite engine within existing DA3 levels, and people loading up the game and moving around the camera, creating cinematic sequences, and the like, for the intent of capturing a video for demonstration.
If you were to draw the closest analogue to what the trailer was, it'd be the in game cinematics from DAO and DA2. The only hesitation one might put on "in game" is that upon playing the game at release, someone might go "Hey, where's that scene of the Qunari slowly turning around? I didn't see that in my game!" You might not see a scene that actually has Cassandra stabbing daggers into tables, and you might not come across a scene where Varric is looking over some dead bodies."
BasilKarlo wrote...
Reznore57 wrote...
http://social.biowar...x/16835776&lf=8
From Allan :
"Our trailer was "in engine" in that, it was DA3 assets placed inside the Frostbite engine within existing DA3 levels, and people loading up the game and moving around the camera, creating cinematic sequences, and the like, for the intent of capturing a video for demonstration.
If you were to draw the closest analogue to what the trailer was, it'd be the in game cinematics from DAO and DA2. The only hesitation one might put on "in game" is that upon playing the game at release, someone might go "Hey, where's that scene of the Qunari slowly turning around? I didn't see that in my game!" You might not see a scene that actually has Cassandra stabbing daggers into tables, and you might not come across a scene where Varric is looking over some dead bodies."
That explanation doesn't really hold water to me. The trailer says "ACTUAL GAME FOOTAGE" which obviously means actual game footage. If they were worried about people misconstruing the trailer as being straight out of the game that phrase seems even more damning than "Actual In-Game Graphics." I think they used the FB3 engine like an animation suite and made the assets and animations a whole lot prettier than they actually are.
BasilKarlo wrote...
That explanation doesn't really hold water to me. The trailer says "ACTUAL GAME FOOTAGE" which obviously means actual game footage. If they were worried about people misconstruing the trailer as being straight out of the game that phrase seems even more damning than "Actual In-Game Graphics." I think they used the FB3 engine like an animation suite and made the assets and animations a whole lot prettier than they actually are.
Beerfish wrote...
You really are a piece of work. Get off your sorry behind get the Da toolset and test out the cutscene creator. The effects in the cutscene creator are the effects you get in game, the faces are the in game faces, the models are in game models.
Let me ask you this, do you think that all the cutscense from the last two games were no tactual game footage? they were in the game, thus they were actual game footage.
ElitePinecone wrote...
I think that, possibly, getting anxious about trailer footage not matching up to the final product a year and a half before release
is pushing the boundaries of being reasonable. We have literally
nothing else with which to compare that, so wondering about the truth of
what was shown is a bit premature at this point.
If live
gameplay looks nothing like that (whenever they show it), then I think
you'd have grounds for claiming it'd been manipulated.
Modifié par BasilKarlo, 12 juin 2013 - 05:29 .
Guest_BarbarianBarbie_*
BasilKarlo wrote...
That explanation doesn't really hold water to me. <snip>
BasilKarlo wrote...
I'm not anxious at all. I just don't believe that the game is already looking that polished and gorgeous if they still need 16 months or more to finish it. It makes no sense.
discosuperfly wrote...
BasilKarlo wrote...
That explanation doesn't really hold water to me. <snip>
Clearly, you just don't get it. What I don't understand is why you're fixating on this particular subject. Seems like if you wanted to point at something you think BioWare is lying about you would pick something like their "open world" claim.
Retour en haut