205 réponses à ce sujet

[mousestalker]

You want more?

[EpicBoot2daFace]

Only Bethesda can deliver 100-200 hours of content in a two year dev cycle.

[CronoDragoon]

I want as much unique content as possible. If the extra 40 hours is reused areas and enemies, then just give me 60 hours. That's still a long game.

[Dessalines]

The content needs to be fresh. The Mage Tower/Fade was boring and long. It added some insight to the lore and your companions, but it could have been shorter too.

[Peranor]

JerZeyCJ2 wrote...

Why is this even a question? Of course I want a longer game! Who wants less content for their money?

[Svanhildr]

Longer games with more content is always a plus.

[Ghost]

Wonderllama4 wrote...

Dragon Age: Origins was a massive game with tons of quests and areas to explore. It took me at least 100 hours in my first playthrough. It was an awesome value for your money, especially since so many modern games are only 10-20 hours. I remember Knights of the Old Republic taking 100 hours of my life too.

Dragon Age II has considerably less content, but still took me a lot of time to complete. It was more in line with the Mass Effect games, which took me 60 hours each.

Do people want shorter games or longer games? Personally I want as much content as possible.

KOTOR took you 100 hrs?

[Fishy]

damn I`m SUCH A NERDZ

Modifié par Suprez30, 17 septembre 2012 - 09:05 .

[Welsh Inferno]

anorling wrote...

JerZeyCJ2 wrote...

Why is this even a question? Of course I want a longer game! Who wants less content for their money?

[Fishy]

100 hours of content and 100 hours to complete the game is very different in my world.

Origins had more than 100 hours of content with every origins and class/race possiblities . But I completed it in 45 hours the first time.

Modifié par Suprez30, 17 septembre 2012 - 09:08 .

[Applepie_Svk]

Ghost1017 wrote...

Wonderllama4 wrote...

Dragon Age: Origins was a massive game with tons of quests and areas to explore. It took me at least 100 hours in my first playthrough. It was an awesome value for your money, especially since so many modern games are only 10-20 hours. I remember Knights of the Old Republic taking 100 hours of my life too.

Dragon Age II has considerably less content, but still took me a lot of time to complete. It was more in line with the Mass Effect games, which took me 60 hours each.

Do people want shorter games or longer games? Personally I want as much content as possible.

KOTOR took you 100 hrs?

DA:O - 22-29 hours deppends on class
DA2 - 18 hours
ME1 - 34+ hours
ME2 - 28+ hours
ME3 - 16 - 21 hours
KOTOR - 25 hours

(all quests done)

LOL ... I feel like a speed of light here 

[Mechler]

SWTOR ammount of content. Or as close as possible.

[naughty99]

I'd love to see more emergent gameplay, different ways to complete questlines, very different playing styles, origin stories and race customization options, etc. that enhance the replay value.

EpicBoot2daFace wrote...

If you do everything, DA:O was close to 100 hours. DA2 was around 30-40 hours if you did everything. ME1 was 20 hours. ME2 was 39 hours. ME3 was 40-45 hours.

 

My experience was quite different, as DA2 lasted much longer than DA:O for me. The combat on Nightmare setting was much more challenging, since we could no longer spam healing potions, and there were some very tricky rogue enemies, etc. Overall combat seemed to be one area that was an improvement from DA:O, and if you play as I do, constantly pausing and micromanaging every action by every squad member without using tactics, (and dying frequently) it results in a significantly longer playing time.

DA:O lasted around 100 hours or so including Awakenings and various DLC. DA2 took me about 120 hours to get up to the end of Act 2, then I started over with a new character to test the beta version of the first patch. My second playthough lasted another 150 hours and I made it up to the middle of Act 3. Haven't finished the game yet and I played nearly 300 hours.

I'm not expecting content on the level of a massive open world RPG that can provide 1000s of hours of content, but I'd say around 100-200 hours for each playthrough of DA3 would be great, especially if there is greater replay value than DA2. I found DA:O's origin stories and various playable races were fun enough to play through the entire game several times in order to try each one. The replay value of DA2 was significantly lower.

Modifié par naughty99, 17 septembre 2012 - 09:23 .

[OMTING52601]

I DO NOT WANT AN MMO. Sorry for the caps, but I don't know that I can possibly make it clear otherwise. Sure, make a 100+ hour game, as long as it had tons of character interaction and a really solid, deeply developed and well written plot. Otherwise, I'll take a sixty/seventy hour game with three-dimensional and engaging characters, a properly done romance(if its included - if its not there, or it's a joke, I'd rather it be left out altogether), and an intricate - but focused- plot any day.

Hell, if the game had the above three, and excellent replayability(which is a must, IMO, for DA 3), I'd be happy if the game ran 45-50 hours for the SP playthrough.

[Fishy]

Applepie_Svk wrote...

Ghost1017 wrote...

Wonderllama4 wrote...

Dragon Age: Origins was a massive game with tons of quests and areas to explore. It took me at least 100 hours in my first playthrough. It was an awesome value for your money, especially since so many modern games are only 10-20 hours. I remember Knights of the Old Republic taking 100 hours of my life too.

Dragon Age II has considerably less content, but still took me a lot of time to complete. It was more in line with the Mass Effect games, which took me 60 hours each.

Do people want shorter games or longer games? Personally I want as much content as possible.

KOTOR took you 100 hrs?

DA:O - 22-29 hours deppends on class
DA2 - 18 hours
ME1 - 34+ hours
ME2 - 28+ hours
ME3 - 16 - 21 hours
KOTOR - 25 hours

(all quests done)

LOL ... I feel like a speed of light here 

See how we`re different? ME1 took me 10 hours and ME3 40 hours.
i think it`s all depend of what you consider funs in  agame and if you`re willing to do it. For instance i skipped the Me1 Minerals.. Which consisted of 50 % of the game content.

While in me2 and m3 i am a completionist and do everything.

Modifié par Suprez30, 17 septembre 2012 - 09:15 .

[EpicBoot2daFace]

If you do everything, DA:O was close to 100 hours. DA2 was around 30-40 hours if you did everything. ME1 was 20 hours. ME2 was 39 hours. ME3 was 40-45 hours.

[Renmiri1]

I don't mind 60 hours of content if we get fun DLCs as Legacy and MotA .

[Ghost]

Suprez30 wrote...

Applepie_Svk wrote...

Ghost1017 wrote...

Wonderllama4 wrote...

Dragon Age: Origins was a massive game with tons of quests and areas to explore. It took me at least 100 hours in my first playthrough. It was an awesome value for your money, especially since so many modern games are only 10-20 hours. I remember Knights of the Old Republic taking 100 hours of my life too.

Dragon Age II has considerably less content, but still took me a lot of time to complete. It was more in line with the Mass Effect games, which took me 60 hours each.

Do people want shorter games or longer games? Personally I want as much content as possible.

KOTOR took you 100 hrs?

DA:O - 22-29 hours deppends on class
DA2 - 18 hours
ME1 - 34+ hours
ME2 - 28+ hours
ME3 - 16 - 21 hours
KOTOR - 25 hours

(all quests done)

LOL ... I feel like a speed of light here 

See how we`re different? ME1 took me 10 hours and ME3 40 hours.
i think it`s all depend of what you consider funs in  agame and if you`re willing to do it. For instance i skipped the Me1 Minerals.. Which consisted of 50 % of the game content.

While in me2 and m3 i am a completionist and do everything.

This is how it is for me.
ME1 Insanity all sq plus DLC 20 hrs
ME2 all dlc/sq 40hrs
ME3 all sq/dlc 40hrs

[Fishy]

EpicBoot2daFace wrote...

If you do everything, DA:O was close to 100 hours. DA2 was around 30-40 hours if you did everything. ME1 was 20 hours. ME2 was 39 hours. ME3 was 40-45 hours.

Although with DLC ME2 raise easily to 55 hours and ME3 to 45 hours.
DA:0 for me.. It`s had over 600 hours of game content (with mod and everything )

DA2 took me 44 hours the first time .

[Momiji.mii]

I don't want an endless game, but as others have suggested, having a core storyline that takes X hours to complete and then Y hours of volountary exploration/sidequests are as always a good way to cater both to players with unlimited free time, as well as players who have families, work, school, etc.

Though I do prefer a short game with a lot of variable content to long games with limited replayability.

[spirosz]

I want quality.

[iceman228433]

If i were still 6 and only had one game to play make it as long as you want, I just don't have the time for some of these longer games, I like about a 30 hour game with high replay myself.

[Kevin Lynch]

The question makes me think about my recent experience playing Skyrim. It was a massive and entirely fantastic game where my first character was played for 183+ hours. That's a huge time investment that, despite the overall quality of the game, I just can't warrant putting into it again. In smaller chunks, as with the previous DA games, I can manage several replays before being distracted by something new. I didn't even bother with Dawnguard because the game was already so overwhelmingly huge that an add-on wasn't necessary.

So, I'm actually preferring the mid-range of hours for games these days. A solid 50-70 hour game that is filled with diverse content and a great story will do me just fine through 3-4 replays, making it the equivalent of that one run through Skyrim. Too, I can intersperse other games among those replays, if I want, so I don't have to burn myself out. Finally, when good DLC and expansions come along, I can add them in to a new game and not have to concern myself about the fact that I'm already beyond the point where they fit well.

So, definitely on the mid-range side of things. Nothing shorter than 40 hours and longer than 80 is stretching it for frequent replay.

[EssEeeEcks]

However long it is, I don't want any padding.