75 réponses à ce sujet

[Dino]

Where did you hear 10 companions?

[Darth Wraith]

What makes you think you're going to have separate recruitment missions for them all like in ME2? You could easily find several companions in the same location, like Leliana and Sten in DA:O.

[Naughty Bear]

DavorTheDragon wrote...

Where did you hear 10 companions?

Here: http://uk.ign.com/ar...ition-announced

[KENNY4753]

I want 5 old, 5 new.

new- Cassandra, Cullen, Stroud, Lanaya, somebody from Asunder

old- Leliana, Merrill, 2 from Awakening (prefer Oghren and Velanna), and Varric

Modifié par KENNY4753, 17 septembre 2012 - 06:06 .

[Uccio]

I´m fine by that.

[Wulfram]

Well DA:O had 10, including Shale.

I believe the leak also suggested a 5 man party, which would logically suggest more characters in order to allow real choice.

[Naughty Bear]

Wulfram wrote...

Well DA:O had 10, including Shale.

I believe the leak also suggested a 5 man party, which would logically suggest more characters in order to allow real choice.

wat

[Dessalines]

No one has stated how much of the survey is true, and ten companions would work if the use the concept of time better. People die,People move, .....Lol, your LI will want to stop adventuring, and want to continue rule.

[JerZey CJ]

I disagree, I think 10 is a great number for a party-based RPG.

[Little Princess Peach]

I think it would be fine if they leave half way through the chaptor and have another npc replace them.

[Medhia Nox]

I disagree - one of the few reasons I play CRPGs - are for the complex NPC interactions.

I'd also like an ensemble cast - and the destruction of the singular hero CRPG - but that's a pipe dream that died with Gold Box CRPGs.

[Dino]

Thanks.

It says up to 10. So just recruit the ones you want and leave the rest out of the story.

[hexaligned]

10 sounds about right. The problem with 5 is that you only have one (if you are lucky 2) characters to fill any particular role. For instance if you wanted a healer in DA2 you had to take Anders, in every play through. If you found Anders to be intolerably annoying, you were just **** out of luck.

5 would be fine if I had the option to create my own mercenaries or something, 5 is just too restrictive in a 4 party member based game.

[Dino]

JerZeyCJ2 wrote...

I disagree, I think 10 is a great number for a party-based RPG.

Same here. It adds to the complexity. 

[Korusus]

Part of the allure of a game where you strategize and develop tactics is deciding which companions you want to bring along. If you only had 5 companions that would kind of ruin that aspect. If you react this way to 10, god forbid you ever play the original Baldur's Gate, your head would 'splode.

Modifié par Korusus, 17 septembre 2012 - 06:12 .

[KAM12780]

I love choice and being able to choose who I want to travel with. You don't want to get stuck with a character you don't like. (looking at you Merril!).

[dreaming_raithe]

JBourne81 wrote...

Are you kidding me, Bioware?  That's a bit too much.  It became a total chore and totally unenjoyable for me in Mass Effect 2 to recruit so many.  Why not decrease the number from 10 to 5 and that way it leaves more room to develop other aspects of the game.  Too much recruitment is very tedious quite frankly.

You can skip several of them, you know.

I'm actually excited to have 10, though, as that was one of the best parts of ME2 for me. Bioware's done a lot of fantastic characters over the years and I think the squad in ME2 has some of the best examples of that.

[Mr.House]

I don't see the problem of having 10 companions. DAo had 10 and DA2 had 9. BG had 25 companions and BG2 had 17 companions.

[Cathey]

If there are 10 companions, brilliant. Make some of them mandatory and the rest optional. Then people who like to have a lot of choice are happy.