Just like how bloody violence and gore adds maturity.Thomas Andresen wrote...
Because nudity adds maturity. Yes.Nightwriter wrote...
Yes. Gimme. I would so love it if their games started treating me like an adult again. Not that I really deserve to be called an adult. But still. Adult love scenes. Gimme.
Should there be nudity, or no? (The thread that just won't die)
#1176
Posté 01 août 2013 - 03:38
#1177
Posté 01 août 2013 - 03:58
cjones91 wrote...
Just like how bloody violence and gore adds maturity.Thomas Andresen wrote...
Because nudity adds maturity. Yes.Nightwriter wrote...
Yes. Gimme. I would so love it if their games started treating me like an adult again. Not that I really deserve to be called an adult. But still. Adult love scenes. Gimme.
I turn persistent gore off. Does that make me immature?
Modifié par iakus, 01 août 2013 - 04:01 .
#1178
Posté 01 août 2013 - 04:11
I don't care if little kids don't like it or parents have an outrage of if Fox News explodes. The game warns against it, if you disregard that, then its your fault. If your child says I want to go into the building with tinted windows thats sells dirty DVDs, then you say no. You don't let him in then complain when he doesn't like it and rage about it. You look stupid.
#1179
Posté 01 août 2013 - 04:22
Not at all.Sometimes seeing all the blood and guts everywhere can be annoying.iakus wrote...
cjones91 wrote...
Just like how bloody violence and gore adds maturity.Thomas Andresen wrote...
Because nudity adds maturity. Yes.Nightwriter wrote...
Yes. Gimme. I would so love it if their games started treating me like an adult again. Not that I really deserve to be called an adult. But still. Adult love scenes. Gimme.
I turn persistent gore off. Does that make me immature?
#1180
Posté 01 août 2013 - 04:23
the fox news thing was a long time ago things have changed. also it is rated M if a kid plays it and is "tramatized" then it is his fault and whoever bought it for him since stores are only allowed to sell rated M games to people who are at least 18. it will even say why it is rated M so if whoever is buying the game spends the 10 seconds (at most) to look at the rating tag thing you could see it. also the witcher 2 came in with not a lot of outrage and that was a brutal game and it had people completely naked. also GTA is the most controversial games ever (literally they are in the guiness book of records for it) and they sell very well and in the end sales are what matterTriforce Hermit wrote...
If the game is rated mature, then it should be intended for mature audiences. I'm fine with or without nudity since I don't play for sexual scenes. Really, they already border on nudity and The Witcher franchise does fine with it, I'd say go ahead with the option for it to be turned off.
I don't care if little kids don't like it or parents have an outrage of if Fox News explodes. The game warns against it, if you disregard that, then its your fault. If your child says I want to go into the building with tinted windows thats sells dirty DVDs, then you say no. You don't let him in then complain when he doesn't like it and rage about it. You look stupid.
#1181
Posté 01 août 2013 - 04:25
I never turn it off but I admit sometimes it is stupid.cjones91 wrote...
Not at all.Sometimes seeing all the blood and guts everywhere can be annoying.iakus wrote...
cjones91 wrote...
Just like how bloody violence and gore adds maturity.Thomas Andresen wrote...
Because nudity adds maturity. Yes.Nightwriter wrote...
Yes. Gimme. I would so love it if their games started treating me like an adult again. Not that I really deserve to be called an adult. But still. Adult love scenes. Gimme.
I turn persistent gore off. Does that make me immature?
warden:alistar lets kiss
alistar : we have darkspawn blood all over us and we are in the deep roads ah what the h***
#1182
Posté 01 août 2013 - 05:06
True, but David Gaider's comments during DAO's development suggested that the game did actually have more nudity in it, at some point, but then it wasn't in the game at release, so someone along the way elected to remove it.EntropicAngel wrote...
Gaider has addressed that before, and said flat out that that is not why they're doing it. All that's left there is to believe or disbelieve him.
Further, given BioWare's general assertion that clipping is bad, the animation on the Desire Demon was clearly designed with naked breasts in mind, and those odd gilded nipple covers were added later. I also recall seeing a screenshot of the Desire Demon, before release, with her nude design intact.
Regardless of why the nudity was removed from DAO, it was removed.
#1183
Posté 01 août 2013 - 05:07
Exactly. It's the same reason why I used mods to disable corpse decay. If the corpses don't decay, and just pile up, it really drives home the human cost of all these fights to the death.MerinTB wrote...
My recent playthrough I had Wynne and Alistair with me at Ostagar. And I had forgotten that I had that "true nudity" mod or whatever (sorry, the underwear is ridiculous - this playthrough my Warden didn't even romance anyone, so it really hadn't come up except a prisoner here and there.)
Seeing a naked Cailan hanging there was very uncomfortable. It FELT more degrading to me.
So, from personal experience, I completely agree it was more powerful.
#1184
Posté 01 août 2013 - 05:35
iakus wrote...
I turn persistent gore off. Does that make me immature?
ditto
#1185
Posté 01 août 2013 - 05:36
Sylvius the Mad wrote...
Exactly. It's the same reason why I used mods to disable corpse decay. If the corpses don't decay, and just pile up, it really drives home the human cost of all these fights to the death.
That gets nuts if you play a game like Dawn of War but turn the graphics way up to allow persistant, high count bodies. You are eventually fighting on a battlefield paved with corpses.
#1186
Posté 01 août 2013 - 05:45
EntropicAngel wrote...
Gaider has addressed that before, and said flat out that that is not why they're doing it. All that's left there is to believe or disbelieve him.MerinTB wrote...
I'm sure there are people working at BioWare who want nudity in the games, who wouldn't mind nudity in the games, and who would definitely not want it in the games. I doubt they are monolithically of the same mind on it, or on anything.
What matters is who is in charge of making that call, ultimately.
They aren't including nudity because someone with authority told them not to. That is exactly what I said.
My larger point (well, second point - first was about perceived reasoning being perecived whether true or not) was that there's no way, absolutely no way, that everyone working on a given title has the same opinion on nudity in video games. Not likely with two creators, no way with dozens.
Mr. Gaider has his own views. He also probably knows at least part of the decision making process that went on, behind the scenes, that went into what was and was not included in DA:O as far as content. So he surely does have a grasp on why the final decision was made.
Which still doesn't negate anything I said.
EntropicAngel wrote...
Plus, they have homosexual and interspecial (using the loose definition of species) sex. The ME games let you have sex with sentient birds. I find it next to impossible to believe that they're afraid of backlash.
They pick their battles. ME for two games claimed, quite loudly, that there was no homosexuality in the ME universe (Asari not really having a gender being their "reasoning" why females with Asari didn't count.)
So BioWare isn't monolothic, as I said, on these issues. Different teams, and even different individuals working on said teams, have different world views and different priorities.
BioWare has staked it's ground on fighting for inclusion for homosexuality. It's a fight that, despite the negativity, they'd decided to take.
They have not staked ground on nudity in video games. It is NOT a fight they decided to take.
Both will have backlash. Whether they feel the backlash is worth what they are trying to accomplish is a good part of why decisions are made.
But, again, it ultimately comes down to whom gets to make final decisions and what they say on inclusion of content.
...
As for "sex with sentient birds", whatever, sci-fi has had inter-plantary sentient species romances since before any of us on these boards were born. Greeks told stories of sex with animals and gods, and with gods in the form of animals. Please.
#1187
Posté 01 août 2013 - 06:21
MerinTB wrote...
They pick their battles. ME for two games claimed, quite loudly, that there was no homosexuality in the ME universe (Asari not really having a gender being their "reasoning" why females with Asari didn't count.)
1. You must have played a different Mass Effect than I did. Never once was "there's no homosexuality" ever pressed, neither explicitly nor implicitly.
2. The game itself refers to asari as being an all female species. Monogendered =\\= no gender.
Modifié par o Ventus, 01 août 2013 - 06:21 .
#1188
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 01 août 2013 - 07:04
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Foopydoopydoo wrote...
EntropicAngel wrote...
I don't think anyone, even the people who don't agree with nekkid gay sex, really cares about the "outrage."
I'm not talking about the forum's reaction here though. If Fox had their panties in a wad about le side-boob they would completely lose their conservative-heteronormative mind in a situation like that. Which is why their won't be nudity in Bioware's games for the forseeable future. IMO of course.
I know you're not talking about this forum.
I guess I assumed you were talking about society, when you were talking about Fox News itself. The "conservative heteronormatives" in society don't really care about outrage.
#1189
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 01 août 2013 - 07:05
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
MerinTB wrote...
They aren't including nudity because someone with authority told them not to. That is exactly what I said.
My larger point (well, second point - first was about perceived reasoning being perecived whether true or not) was that there's no way, absolutely no way, that everyone working on a given title has the same opinion on nudity in video games. Not likely with two creators, no way with dozens.
Mr. Gaider has his own views. He also probably knows at least part of the decision making process that went on, behind the scenes, that went into what was and was not included in DA:O as far as content. So he surely does have a grasp on why the final decision was made.
Which still doesn't negate anything I said.
Of course everyone has differing views. That's very obvious. The point though is that Gaider has said specifically that it's not because of Fox News.
That may be wrong, and if it is point it out Gaider. But I'm fairly certain it's correct.
They pick their battles. ME for two games claimed, quite loudly, that there was no homosexuality in the ME universe (Asari not really having a gender being their "reasoning" why females with Asari didn't count.)
So BioWare isn't monolothic, as I said, on these issues. Different teams, and even different individuals working on said teams, have different world views and different priorities.
BioWare has staked it's ground on fighting for inclusion for homosexuality. It's a fight that, despite the negativity, they'd decided to take.
They have not staked ground on nudity in video games. It is NOT a fight they decided to take.
Both will have backlash. Whether they feel the backlash is worth what they are trying to accomplish is a good part of why decisions are made.
But, again, it ultimately comes down to whom gets to make final decisions and what they say on inclusion of content.
...
As for "sex with sentient birds", whatever, sci-fi has had inter-plantary sentient species romances since before any of us on these boards were born. Greeks told stories of sex with animals and gods, and with gods in the form of animals. Please.
The point of that statement was that Bioware is currently doing things that will or could "earn" them backlash--so the idea of them being afraid of, and censoring themselves because of backlash seems silly.
#1190
Posté 01 août 2013 - 07:34
#1191
Posté 01 août 2013 - 09:08
Maybe it wasn't. Maybe he was talking about the broodmothers. I wouldn't put it past him.Sylvius the Mad wrote...
Regardless of why the nudity was removed from DAO, it was removed.
#1192
Posté 01 août 2013 - 09:58
Exhibit:


Modifié par Fraq Hound, 01 août 2013 - 10:00 .
#1193
Posté 02 août 2013 - 12:24
If DAI had sex like the Witcher games have had it would show up on Fox .
Despite the rated M for mature there are certain lines Gaider , Laidlaw, Darrah et al won't cross because they personally find it offensive.
#1194
Posté 02 août 2013 - 12:32

How did I not see that?
#1195
Posté 02 août 2013 - 12:44
#1196
Posté 02 août 2013 - 02:25
edited: removed inappropriate content ~Mod05
Taking a moment to make fun of another culture's tradition and religion? Classy.
Modifié par BioWareMod05, 02 août 2013 - 04:48 .
#1197
Posté 02 août 2013 - 04:00
edited: removed inappropriate content ~Mod05
Not to get into a Biblical discussion here but:
Adam was blamed as well. The blame was equal and so both were exiled.
Also:
I love breasts...
The woman's body is a work of pure art. The male's body is disgusting.
Modifié par BioWareMod05, 02 août 2013 - 04:49 .
#1198
Posté 02 août 2013 - 06:11
o Ventus wrote...
1. You must have played a different Mass Effect than I did. Never once was "there's no homosexuality" ever pressed, neither explicitly nor implicitly.
I'm sorry, you're right - that was BioWare's stance on Star Wars, not Mass Effect -
http://www.bit-tech....y-in-star-war/1
BioWare just said that Shepard wasn't gay, prior to ME3, because he was a "pre-established character" and they were shooting for a "PG-13 action" feel -
http://kotaku.com/55...n-mass-effect-2
o Ventus wrote...
2. The game itself refers to asari as being an all female species. Monogendered == no gender.
Yeah, if you haven't seen the homophobic rationalizations for the Asari before me stating it now, you're either new-ish to Mass Effect discussions or have a selective memory.
Modifié par MerinTB, 02 août 2013 - 06:13 .
#1199
Posté 02 août 2013 - 07:11
BioWareMod05 wrote...
Not to get into a Biblical discussion here but:edited: removed inappropriate content ~Mod05
Adam was blamed as well. The blame was equal and so both were exiled.
Also:
I love breasts...
The woman's body is a work of pure art. The male's body is disgusting.
You know, I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. Having one myself, I can assure you art was not one of the corner stones laid as foundation for the female body. Weak limbs, raging hormonal peaks and monthly, disabling pains, yes. Art? Not so much.
Oh and the male body is a work of perfection! Except for the dangly bits, I don't find those all that aestetically pleasing. <_<
#1200
Posté 02 août 2013 - 07:21
MerinTB wrote...
Yeah, if you haven't seen the homophobic rationalizations for the Asari before me stating it now, you're either new-ish to Mass Effect discussions or have a selective memory.
1. I love how those are the 2 extremes in apparently bound to. You couldn't have been more arbitrary if you tried.
2. Rationalizations? For what? The very first words first words spoken in the second paragraph in the codex entry about the asari are "an all female species..."




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





