Hayllee wrote...
MorningBird wrote...
AdmiralDavidAnderson wrote...
Well they should at least let us know what happened to the warden!
I'm pretty sure it's left ambiguous so that you, the player, can fix whatever ending you like to your Warden's story.
Personally, that's my preferance. Half the reason I didn't finish ME3 was because ALL of the endings left a sour taste in my mouth. The endings to DAO and DA2 at least leave enough wiggle room for me to come up with my own happy/angsty endings.

I would be perfectly happy and agree completely with this if my Warden wasn't missing. I kind of feel like they should finish what happened if they're going to say she's missing, you know? Or at least not give Alistair 's fate if they don't address the warden's. <3Maybe they ran off and lived in a happy cottage together with their adopted kid. <3
No?
Hahah, I'd say that's fair enough for a Queen/King Warden. Otherwise, I think 'missing' could easily be interperated as 'off the Seeker's radar'.
This does leave players with enough room to dictate their Warden's fate. After all, if they stuck with the Wardens, the actual Order is under no obligation to release his/her whereabouts to the Chantry/Seekers/Divine. If they abandoned the Wardens to do their 'own thang' like Anders, 'missing' is plenty ambiguous enough.
Having a Queen/King Warden though
does pose more of a loose end, especially if you have a married King Alistair/Queen Anora (? Not actually sure if she shows up in DA2) appear in Act 3.
But even then, a Queen/King of the Warden's standing is likely entitled 'sebaticle'. XD Maric 'abandoned' his throne to play guide in the Deep Roads, after all, and easily could have died down there... and Loghain (I think) was the only one to know his true wereabouts.