327 réponses à ce sujet

[The Elder King]

Vandicus wrote...


Also they said specializations would have greater meaning, and that the player might only be able to choose one in each playthrough.

That would be great. I'd prefer to choose one specialization with some relevance in the game and with a longer skill tree than two specs with no releveance and shorter skill trees.

[Heimdall]

hhh89 wrote...

Vandicus wrote...


Also they said specializations would have greater meaning, and that the player might only be able to choose one in each playthrough.

That would be great. I'd prefer to choose one specialization with some relevance in the game and with a longer skill tree than two specs with no releveance and shorter skill trees.

I'm pretty sure they said this was a direct response to how sanguine everyone was about you being a blood Mage in DA2.

[The Elder King]

Lord Aesir wrote...

hhh89 wrote...




That would be great. I'd prefer to choose one specialization with some relevance in the game and with a longer skill tree than two specs with no releveance and shorter skill trees.

I'm pretty sure they said this was a direct response to how sanguine everyone was about you being a blood Mage in DA2.

Yeah, that was pretty bad (though almost nobody recognized you were a mage either, despite fireballing enemies in the streets of Kirkwall).
Though making the people recognize you're a blood mage (or a templat, in a minor extent) will be a lot easier than recognized a force mage or a berseker. They have to work on the specialization to give them a more backgroung.