109 réponses à ce sujet

[phimseto]

Based on existing and past threads, I generally think I am in the majority regarding multiplayer in DA3 (against a full-on separate mode, like what was done in ME3), but I genuinely don't know.  Therefore, I've put it to the test.  Please vote here and let me know what you think!

http://social.biowar...44/polls/39523/ 

Of course, BSN isn't the entirety of BW fandom, but I do think they're representative of a significant percentage.  

[ManOfSteel]

I would prefer no multiplayer, but I'd be totally open to item and gold trading. Perhaps do it like Darksiders 2. Send messages to other players with items/gold attached or something like that.

[phimseto]

Doom, that was my vote. I don't really do any of the co-op in the Fable games, but I thought they did all the other multiplayer stuff just right. I loved being able to help out friends and also see where they were in a game.

[alhamel94]

i dont see why a me3 style mp wouldnt work...
you can tactically pause in the singleplayer for all mass effects, the mp would just be more fast paced

[Beerfish]

Separate multiplayer like ME3's which is aleardy co-op, works pretty well and is a lot of fun. Just make sure MP has no effect on the SP story, unlike the mild ME3 blunder.

[phimseto]

For me, it's not about whether or not it could work, but rather that there's only so many resources and disc space for a game, and multiplayer detracts from that. For example, I think ME3's multiplayer "works" but I would have happily lived without it if it meant more SP content in the actual game.

[Battlebloodmage]

I don't care about Multiplayers, but i would at least hope that there is no more forced online-play like the random readiness thing in ME3. Yes, it's possible with single player, but it would limit a lot of choices in ME3.

[ev76]

Although I voted for full multi and full co-op the gold, item exchange intrigues me. Sounds cool.

[hexaligned]

"No multiplayer" isn't an option.  You should remove it for a more accurate result. Or just add those to the least intrusive multiplayer option maybe.

Modifié par relhart, 18 septembre 2012 - 05:16 .

[phimseto]

relhart wrote...

"No multiplayer" isn't an option.  You should remove it for a more accurate result. Or just add those to the least intrusive multiplayer option maybe.

The poll is an expression of fan desire, not what's actually going to come to pass.  And what I mean by "no multiplayer" (and it's too late to edit) is the status quo - the way the games link to BSN and nothing more than that.

[ladyofpayne]

I want very good single player game. There is enough MMORPG already.

[Reidbynature]

I don't trust them with multiplayer. Simple as that.

[sunnydxmen]

No multiplayer.

[Edorian27]

Multiplayer in ME3 is nice, BUT

I'd like them to fully focus and put all ressources in an outstanding SP game rather then that.

So no, please no MP for DA3, just focus every bit of work into single player.

Modifié par Edorian27, 18 septembre 2012 - 05:23 .

[Vandicus]

Just an fyi to people here asking multiplayer to be excluded in any form.

http://www.gamespot....ls-boss-6394663

That's pretty much not going to happen.

It is fine and all to express your own personal disinclination towards multiplayer, but it would be disingenuous to allow you to believe that your feedback will influence multiplayer's existence. The type of multiplayer might very well be influenced by a poll but the removal of multiplayer altogether is pretty much not even in Bioware's hands.

[ReinaHW]

No multi player at all would be nice, we need more single player only games, not less. Multi player is best left to military FPS rehashes and racing games.

[CasbynessPC]

When I pick up a game in a store and look at the back, if I see "GET INVOLVED IN THE MULTIPLAYER ACTION!" emblazoned upon the blurb and screenshots, I put down the game and walk away.

If age ratings were properly enforced online, all the 6 year olds would vanish from the intertubes, the multiplayer gaming market would collapse and all would be right with the world again.

[alhamel94]

theres one thing you all fail to consider. multiplayer makes more money. i may not be entirely accurate in my judgments as i have played me on console and da on pc, but i think that da3 is going to be fine. i dont understand the complaints with me3s singleplayer it is very gripping and intense even if the ending is terrible. from what ive seen da is headed the same way. the first game was a very good rpg with lots of rpg elements and honestly combat that left a lot to be desired. it wasnt fluid and didnt look pretty. in mass effect 2 they attempted to fix the combat fluidity at the cost of a lot of rpg elements. dragon age did a similar thing. with me3 bioware added mp and brought a very good mix of rpg elements and combat fluidity. i expect the same from da3, and i dont think its a bad thing but i also will tell you that there is a difference between da and me and i believe that tactical pausing and advanced combat tactics will still be in force in da3

[Biotic_Warlock]

Co-op campaign could work, though with 4 characters in a party at once (in the last 2 games anyway, idk if they are doing the same again for DA3) it would be less ideal given less spaces for NPCs (although they could be played by another person).
Like in Baldur's Gate where you can create a new character to fill a slot, and you can have other human players play who they want in the party.

[EricHVela]

Yet, another of many, many polls around the 'net that show an overwhelming majority do not want multiplayer in DA3:I.

I think that it won't make any difference. I believe that the decision has been made and there's no going back to change it whether or not the decision was to include multiplayer.

[NUM13ER]

I would rather all resources went to the single player experience. I have never desired any multiplayer aspect or co-op mode in Dragon Age. Nor did I feel it a worthwhile inclusion in ME3 either.

Dragon Age II suffered from the harsh deadlines and short production time. Is it really so wise to add a new element to a largely single player experience when there's already so much of pressure on the team to deliver? Resources and time a lot of fans would feel is better spent making the best single player experience possible.

Doesn't matter if the fans don't want it anyway. If EA does, it's going in regardless. I just hope it doesn't detract from the single player too much.

Modifié par NUM13ER, 19 septembre 2012 - 03:37 .

[alhamel94]

mass effect multiplayer is awesome. grab a mic and make some friends

[Biotic_Warlock]

alhamel94 wrote...

mass effect multiplayer is awesome. grab a mic and make some friends

Uhhr. Pugs... Multiplayer which involves pugs is annoying as it is. I would not ever want to see it in DA.

[Atalanta]

Could someone give me a quick breakdown of what Co-Op is? Is it where a friend can join you on the campaign, or ...?

[Biotic_Warlock]

Atalanta wrote...

Could someone give me a quick breakdown of what Co-Op is? Is it where a friend can join you on the campaign, or ...?

Co-operative. Yeah, it's pretty much playing alongside a friend on a campaign.