519 réponses à ce sujet

[jackmeup]

MutoidMan wrote...

If the hidden purpose of all of the SP story DLC put together is to provide Shep with the resources to achieve a conventional victory - and really, there's no point in any SP DLC otherwise - then I very much hope that From Ashes, Leviathan, and Omega are not the majority of the planned SP DLC because I'd like to see at least seven SP story DLC before Shep can take it to the Reapers.

Once a conventional victory is possible then it becomes the canon ending and ME 4 can pick up from there. The Citadel forces have won their war for survival but at an extremely heavy price. In the midst of the rebuilding efforts, some previously unknown threat - awakened by the Reapers' use of formerly dormant relays - which is aware of the current weakened state of Citadel races' defences is moving to take advantage of this window of opportunity and conquer Citadel space.

I think I would enjoy an entirely new cast of characters, but at the same time would love for the originals to play the important NPC roles, giving us the information on post-Reaper galactic civilization, giving us orders, providing missions, etc.

That would get my money.

I like it but i hope you get to bring your LI as a party member

[Shepard108278]

jackmeup wrote...

hope they continue shepards story there is alot of things i want to see him do like see what happens to him and his LI i choose jack i love her character

Not gonna happen SHepards story ends with ME3.

[Gats]

Shepard108278 wrote...
Not gonna happen SHepards story ends with ME3.

If theory of Indoctrinations of Shepard is "true", then anything can be posible. Don't forget "Red" ending, where he take a deep breathe in the end.

As for Omega.... "Don't f....k with Aria!" But what if we can? 

Modifié par Gats, 17 octobre 2012 - 08:08 .

[IST]

iSousek wrote...

Who cares about Omega, they basically confirmed that they are thinking about continuing the franchise with future games

I totally agree with these fireworks, yet I still care about Omega!!

Mass Effect's back baby, yeah!

[Valiant Corvus]

While this is nice and all, I would much prefer that they fix their damn network issues.

I can't even connect to verify the latest weapon DLC, so I'm not at all excited about a DLC that I'll never be able to play because EA servers are garbage.

[Arxduke]

YES. Please, just make Commander Shepard and the Normandy crew return in a ME4! Waahoo!

This time not rushed. So everyone can get the ending they feel they deserved. I'm not all too stoked about the Omega DLC, just another game!

This is a continuation of the first three games, right? ;o

[Gats]

Arxduke wrote...

YES. Please, just make Commander Shepard and the Normandy crew return in a ME4! Waahoo!

This time not rushed. So everyone can get the ending they feel they deserved. I'm not all too stoked about the Omega DLC, just another game!

This is a continuation of the first three games, right? ;o

Dude.... Why you writing this in theme about Omega DLC?

P.S For everyone. Do you wanna breack the "#1 rule of Omega"?

Modifié par Gats, 18 octobre 2012 - 06:35 .

[Demyx_IX]

This looks good. And a new IP? Interesting.

Give us ME4 first though.

[Apocaleepse360]

I hope this new Mass Effect game won't be a multiplayer-based first person shooter or something... BioWare will hit a new low if that happens.

We need a new main character, a different perspective in the Mass Effect universe. Perhaps something that isn't human, or maybe even a character that we can pick the species of ourselves. I would love to play as something like a Geth, or maybe a Turian.

[Epsilon42]

I'll be cool with the next Mass Effect being ANYTHING OTHER THAN A PREQUEL! As for a continuation, well, all they have to do is make the Destroy ending canon (and it's my canon, so ha!). No BS required to keep Shepard going.

ME4+Shepard+Garrus = 60 of my clams for BioWare/EA.

Hell, Halo 3 ended the story, but they kept Master Chief alive to fight another day. Shepard's way cooler than Master Chief.

Though, to be honest, if the next Mass Effect starred Garrus as the player character, I'd be totally stoked.

[Shepard108278]

Gats wrote...

Shepard108278 wrote...
Not gonna happen SHepards story ends with ME3.

If theory of Indoctrinations of Shepard is "true", then anything can be posible. Don't forget "Red" ending, where he take a deep breathe in the end.

As for Omega.... "Don't f....k with Aria!" But what if we can? 

If they ever make IT cannon I'll scream thugh you do have a point aboout destroy.

[Race1]

Look how Shepard was brought back for 2, they could easily say they used DNA to make a clone or something, that would be the simplest way.

[Gats]

I think game begins frome that ruins where Shepard take deep breathe in the end of "Red" ending. If theory of "Shepard Idoctrination" true, then he have not destroy/control/syntes Reapers (it was all just his dream) some patrol take him from batlefield to field hospital. People lost Earth and fighting on other planet city by city/planet by planet/system by system (like Protheans did). Fight for each planet in galaxy to defeat Reapers. New weapons for fleet that can (not easy but easy enough) destroy "Big Reapers" (forget how they named) by 1-2 shot.

[Shepard VI]

BioWare Montreal producer confirms Commander Shepard's story has come to a close; next game in role-playing game series will feature "very, very different context."

Commander Shepard is gone, but not forgotten. BioWare Montreal producer Fabrice Condominas confirmed to VG247 that Shepard's story is finished, and the captain will not be featured in Mass Effect 4, or whatever the next entry in the series is titled.

"There is one thing we are absolutely sure of--there will be no more Shepard, and the trilogy is over," Condominas said. "This is really our starting point. Now the Mass Effect universe is vast, and very, very rich. So at this point in time, we don't even know what kind of time frame we're going to be in. All we're doing is more gathering ideas from the teams, gathering feedback to see several things."

As for who may replace Shepard as the franchise's leading character, Condominas made clear that BioWare is not simply going to iterate on Shepard.

"So first, we don't want to make 'Shepard 2', or Mass Effect 4 with like, 'oh there's no more Shepard but you're a soldier in the universe'. So this will be a very, very different context for sure, and nothing has been decided on the rest," he said.

Last month alongside the departure of BioWare founders Greg Zeschuk and Ray Muzyka, the company announced that a new Mass Effect game was forming at the studio. Details are non-existent on the project, but it has been confirmed that Mass Effect 3 producer Casey Hudson is attached to the game, said to be a "full" Mass Effect title.

Modifié par IndoctrinatedSpectre, 19 octobre 2012 - 05:34 .

[Shepard108278]

Gats wrote...

I think game begins frome that ruins where Shepard take deep breathe in the end of "Red" ending. If theory of "Shepard Idoctrination" true, then he have not destroy/control/syntes Reapers (it was all just his dream) some patrol take him from batlefield to field hospital. People lost Earth and fighting on other planet city by city/planet by planet/system by system (like Protheans did). Fight for each planet in galaxy to defeat Reapers. New weapons for fleet that can (not easy but easy enough) destroy "Big Reapers" (forget how they named) by 1-2 shot.

That would be terrible and clearly not what bioware intends.

[Gats]

Shepard108278 wrote...

That would be terrible and clearly not what bioware intends.

That will be great! Those who don't like that theory = don't like to think. (If you don't knew what i'm talking about see it first). 
About new weapons and armours... In all wars science research new weapons, armour, etc, You knew how much new weapon was create in World War II? Tanks, Cannons, first Assault Rifle, first Rocket engine, first Atomic bomb.
Or you think in ME world all science dumb and can't find a way to evade reaper shields/armour?

[Philosophaster]

Gats wrote...

Shepard108278 wrote...

That would be terrible and clearly not what bioware intends.

That will be great! Those who don't like that theory = don't like to think. (If you don't knew what i'm talking about see it first). 
About new weapons and armours... In all wars science research new weapons, armour, etc, You knew how much new weapon was create in World War II? Tanks, Cannons, first Assault Rifle, first Rocket engine, first Atomic bomb.
Or you think in ME world all science dumb and can't find a way to evade reaper shields/armour?

Not this so much as the fact the Protheans found themselves in the same scenario you have created and they, with the known exception of Javik, were hunted to extinction. The Protheans had 300 years to develop countermeasures (albeit with a severely diminished capacity for most of that time), and they ultimately failed.

Yes, war fuels scientific research, but I would remind you that in World War II no army consisted of arcane, indoctrinating, sentient machines that were incapable of feeling fear or mercy. The organic forces simply don't have the resources necessary to win the war as they are not only technologically inferior, but in possession of a rapidly depleting industrial base.

If anything, the Crucible is the fruit of your wartime scientific research and collaboration from at least several past failed cycles. Priority: Earth is essentially the last best chance to defeat the Reapers. In your scenario, the Crucible has failed and the Allied Fleet has suffered irreplaceable losses; I don't like your chances of victory.

Modifié par inconsiderate rick, 20 octobre 2012 - 08:17 .

[Hanako Ikezawa]

Gats wrote...

Shepard108278 wrote...

That would be terrible and clearly not what bioware intends.

That will be great! Those who don't like that theory = don't like to think. (If you don't knew what i'm talking about see it first). 
About new weapons and armours... In all wars science research new weapons, armour, etc, You knew how much new weapon was create in World War II?  first Tanks, Cannons, Assault Rifle, first Rocket engine, first Atomic bomb.
Or you think in ME world all science dumb and can't find a way to evade reaper shields/armour?

Love to think outside the box, and still don't like the Indoctrination Hypothesis.
Also, tanks and Howitzers(the cannons I assume you're thinking of) were invented in WWI, though Howitzers can be linked back to earlier cannons that have histories that go back centuries. Asault rifles were also invented in the WWI period.

[Philosophaster]

LDS Darth Revan wrote...

Gats wrote...

Shepard108278 wrote...

That would be terrible and clearly not what bioware intends.

That will be great! Those who don't like that theory = don't like to think. (If you don't knew what i'm talking about see it first). 
About new weapons and armours... In all wars science research new weapons, armour, etc, You knew how much new weapon was create in World War II?  first Tanks, Cannons, Assault Rifle, first Rocket engine, first Atomic bomb.
Or you think in ME world all science dumb and can't find a way to evade reaper shields/armour?

Love to think outside the box, and still don't like the Indoctrination Hypothesis.
Also, tanks and Howitzers(the cannons I assume you're thinking of) were invented in WWI, though Howitzers can be linked back to earlier cannons that have histories that go back centuries. Asault rifles were also invented in the WWI period.

It's a nitpick, but I think Gats is referring to the German StG 44 which some consider to be the first modern assault rifle.

On topic: I look forward to Omega, but I am more intrigued by the possibilities for the next full game. I have no idea what that game's context is going to be (aside from no Shepard which is fine by me) and am happy to see that BioWare is going to continue expanding Mass Effect. I just personally hope it is not an mmo and that they continue to refine the game mechanics that were used for the trilogy.

Modifié par inconsiderate rick, 20 octobre 2012 - 07:38 .

[Hanako Ikezawa]

inconsiderate rick wrote...

It's a nitpick, but I think Gats is referring to the German StG 44 which some consider to be the first modern assault rifle.

On topic: I look forward to Omega, but I am more intrigued by the possibilities for the next full game. I have no idea what that game's context is going to be (aside from no Shepard which is fine by me) and am happy to see that BioWare is going to continue expanding Mass Effect. I just personally hope it is not an mmo and that they continue to refine the game mechanics that were used for the trilogy.

He could of been meaning the StG(hey a Mass Effect term) 44. I was thinking of the M1918 BAR. I too am excited that they will continue the Mass Effect Universe. There's so much more that can be done with it.

[Gats]

LDS Darth Revan wrote...

He could of been meaning the StG(hey a Mass Effect term) 44. I was thinking of the M1918 BAR. I too am excited that they will continue the Mass Effect Universe. There's so much more that can be done with it.

First Assault Rifle is German Sturmgewehr 44. M1918 BAR - automatic carabine he use rifle ammo. Assault rifle ammo have diferent standarts of ammo (diference in lenght -> bullet power)

It will be good if they combine all 3 games in 1. 
From :
Mass Effect 1 - The world full of planets? when you can "land" and explore all of them. 
Mass Effect 2 - System of upgrades (wich need reagents)
Mass Effect 3 - Battle System, cover system, quests (like find some arthefact that can be found on a planet surface like in ME1)
As a new - System of Space Battle (don't wanna runaway everytime). There can be new research of Normandy and all fleet Armour/shields (Reaper tehnology).

Modifié par Gats, 20 octobre 2012 - 08:55 .

[Nykara]

Shepard Shepard Shepard. It's not Mass Effect without Shepard. Find a way to fix the ME3 ending so that the next game is Shep.

[Hanako Ikezawa]

Gats wrote...

LDS Darth Revan wrote...

He could of been meaning the StG(hey a Mass Effect term) 44. I was thinking of the M1918 BAR. I too am excited that they will continue the Mass Effect Universe. There's so much more that can be done with it.

First Assault Rifle is German Sturmgewehr 44. M1918 BAR - automatic carabine he use rifle ammo. Assault rifle ammo have diferent standarts of ammo (diference in lenght -> bullet power)

I agreed that you were right about the assault rifle. However, you're wrong about tanks and Howitzers/cannons.

[Gats]

LDS Darth Revan wrote...

I agreed that you were right about the assault rifle. However, you're wrong about tanks and Howitzers/cannons.

Where are you from? I'm from Russia and knew what i'm talking about. Our tank in the begining of WW2 was old junk
Only KV (Klim Voroshilov) can fight with german tank and only because he was heavy armored (they just can't hit it with theyr low coliber cannon's). They build new tanks with 88mm cannons that kill every tank they shoot. 
Russian make IS/IS2 (Iosif Stallin) heavy tank with angle placed armore plates and with cannon 122mm. First tank with that tehnology was famous T-34 (midle tank, he fight well too). I can tell you more an more there was many researches complete during the war.... grenades... bombs... planes... submorines... First Bodyarmour with Titane plastines inside (wight 90 kg) there was a squad of atletic russian soldiers that test it on battlefield. Germans have Hearth atack when they fire whole ammo clip right in front on enemy and they go like nothing hapen. I can talk long 

Modifié par Gats, 20 octobre 2012 - 07:35 .

[Gats]

in WW1 standart of anti-tank cannons was 57mm when in WW2 apired new heavy tanks that was like moscito bite for them. Thats why they research new cannons that can "kill the tank".

P.S Learn History beter befor you arguing of something pls

Modifié par Gats, 20 octobre 2012 - 01:59 .