Please no Prequels for the next Mass Effect game:
#101
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 09:53
#102
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 10:05
thearbiter1337 wrote...
RadicalDisconnect wrote...
BSN complaining about the lack of choice in ME3. BSN wanting a canon ending.
Bad prequels? Halo Reach says hi.
Hey I liked Halo Reach
Well the Campaign, the MP was not great but not bad
But a bad SEQUAL
Deus Ex:Invisible War
No, I listed Halo Reach as a counterpoint to the claim that all prequels are bad. Sorry if that didn't get across.
#103
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 11:48
#104
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 12:01
Prequels are constrained by the need to build to a conclusion you already know. This removes much of the suspense and sense of adventure.
Even if you need to move forward in time thousands of years (to escape issues with the multiple endings) I would prefer this to going back.
#105
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 12:10
No, of course not. So vote NO to prequels!
Modifié par anorling, 19 septembre 2012 - 12:10 .
#106
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 12:32
#107
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 12:43
#108
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 12:48
#109
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 01:03
I also want to expand on the ME Universe not to Shrink it. Going back in time gives us more of the same old content we had in ME1 to ME3. I want new material.
#110
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 05:18
- what happened to Shepard's own family
- illusive man's past
- establishment of the alliance...
#111
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 05:22
and the way ME3 was with its gears of war concept and ripoffs i wouldnt be surprised if it went prequel
Action mode will be included aswell
i'll tune into twitter to see what day1 dlc i'll miss aswell while i download an app for my phone for MP reasons
#112
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 07:57
IsaacShep wrote...
Co-sign. Please no prequels, FPS, MMO, straight-out action ME games. We want new RPG SEQUEL trilogy with save transfer!
I do want a sequel. But I'm not so sure they should start another trilogy with save-game transfer. I got the feeling it's a bit more then they can handle.
Maybe a duology could work. But I would be fine with just a stand-alone game.
But in the end anything is better then a prequel I guess.
#113
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 08:05
#114
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 08:06
anorling wrote...
IsaacShep wrote...
Co-sign. Please no prequels, FPS, MMO, straight-out action ME games. We want new RPG SEQUEL trilogy with save transfer!
I do want a sequel. But I'm not so sure they should start another trilogy with save-game transfer. I got the feeling it's a bit more then they can handle.
Maybe a duology could work. But I would be fine with just a stand-alone game.
But in the end anything is better then a prequel I guess.
prequel... prequel... prequel... prequel...
Modifié par Applepie_Svk, 19 septembre 2012 - 08:07 .
#115
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 08:09
#116
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 08:12
Modifié par Subject M, 19 septembre 2012 - 08:14 .
#117
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 08:41
RiouHotaru wrote...
This argument is silly. I'd rather we get a game with more info on things like the Krogan Rebellions or the First Contact war. Does it honestly matter that we know how ME3 ends? Geeze.
You don´t get the point ... it´s not about ending of ME3, it´s about endings of those events which already happened ...
The outcomes of your whole game would be already known, let´s say that you would play ME with Krogan rebellion - would you be happy to know as for the main protagonist - your krogan - will die in some stupid battle, because it would be predefine by the lore, it´s already happened... or would you be happy with the knowlendge that despite your protagonist won his battly - the Salarians and Turians released genophage as the reward for your effort ?
Or would you like to play for other side - mad salarians playing on gods, uplifting everything which could breath and trying to prosper from it, facing the critical failure of own stupidity when uplifted shows middlefinger?
Or the Morning war -
Would you like to play survival game on surface of empty Rannoch filled with boddies of your friends and being hunted by geths ?
simply said you couldn´t escape to your destiny and you couldn´t change your destiny - it wouldn´t be an RPG, it would be some kind of linear shooter game with RPG elements (well we already have ME3...)
Modifié par Applepie_Svk, 19 septembre 2012 - 08:56 .
#118
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 09:01
Ser Issac wrote...
Prequels won't work in the ME universe for one very important reason: CHOICE
Unlike Halo, Gears of War, or any other series out there, Mass Effect depends more heavily on player choice. You can say that was taken away all you want to in ME3, but at the end of the day you still decided the fates of entire species (Quarian, Geth, Krogan) before ever reaching the game's ending.
You can't change the history of games that would be set before ME1. History is set in stone. There would be no major choices to make that would have an effect on the ME universe, because it would all have to play out the same.
^
This.
If you take away the choice, then it just stops being Mass Effect for me. The name of the series was intended to be a pun on the core mechanic of the games.
#119
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 09:33
Applepie_Svk wrote...
RiouHotaru wrote...
This argument is silly. I'd rather we get a game with more info on things like the Krogan Rebellions or the First Contact war. Does it honestly matter that we know how ME3 ends? Geeze.
You don´t get the point ... it´s not about ending of ME3, it´s about endings of those events which already happened ...
The outcomes of your whole game would be already known, let´s say that you would play ME with Krogan rebellion - would you be happy to know as for the main protagonist - your krogan - will die in some stupid battle, because it would be predefine by the lore, it´s already happened... or would you be happy with the knowlendge that despite your protagonist won his battly - the Salarians and Turians released genophage as the reward for your effort ?
Or would you like to play for other side - mad salarians playing on gods, uplifting everything which could breath and trying to prosper from it, facing the critical failure of own stupidity when uplifted shows middlefinger?
Or the Morning war -
Would you like to play survival game on surface of empty Rannoch filled with boddies of your friends and being hunted by geths ?
simply said you couldn´t escape to your destiny and you couldn´t change your destiny - it wouldn´t be an RPG, it would be some kind of linear shooter game with RPG elements (well we already have ME3...)
And? Those would be good games. Alpha Protocol lets you make decisions but ALWAYS ends the same way. Heck, most Western RPGs tend to do this. They have multiple branching paths that STILL all come to the same, predetermined conclusion. And those ideas would be awesome games.
#120
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 10:00
#121
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 10:07
Geth become enemy again.
You don't need Thermo-Clip!
take ME1-style Armor?
And nobody knows what the hell Reaper is!
NO WAY!
#122
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 10:09
#123
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 10:11
#124
Posté 19 septembre 2012 - 10:36
#125
Posté 20 septembre 2012 - 11:35
Star fury wrote...
I'd really appreciate prequel about Skyllian blitz.
Why? My shepard is Sole Survivor





Retour en haut






