Bones 6oS wrote...
The value of masculinity:
That boulder never stood a chance!
Hahaha. Real men shave with a bowie knife.
Modifié par billy the squid, 19 septembre 2012 - 08:44 .
Bones 6oS wrote...
The value of masculinity:
That boulder never stood a chance!
Modifié par billy the squid, 19 septembre 2012 - 08:44 .
Eterna5 wrote...
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Still looking like an idiot.
How about you actually try and refute something or are you afraid I'll mentally squash you?
From what I've seen of you in this thread? No, I'm not afraid of being mentally squashed by you in the least.
Modifié par Binary_Helix 1, 19 septembre 2012 - 08:45 .
billy the squid wrote...
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
billy the squid wrote...
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
Women earn less money than men at the same job? Really? Can you please let me in on that lucrative class action lawsuit.
When women earn less money relative to men it's because they choose less demanding careers. Nobody is out to get them.
Facepalm
No. because generally men are more assertive, pushy and demanding when it comes to pay so get better negotiated salaries. Let's face it may of us in the legal and business sector are jerks. Factor in maternity leave and paid time off if they have kids. Yeah your employer won't promote you to the same degree. It's not sexism it's because you took time off, which cost your employer.
Please do not make me school you in employment law. It's very late and I really don't want to dig out my statute book and qoute legislation to you.
In other words men are better at what they do and their pay scale and promotions reflect that?
It's not my fault women bought into the idea that they can have it all (career and family). Life is about priorities.
Not necessarily better.
But are you going to promote someone or increase tha salary of someone who has taken months off, or will in the future and you have to pick up the slack as the employer? No. And woman has said they should have it all. It's a,life choice, some very successful wome do give up having children, some don't want them and some only take the minimum maternity leave before getting back to work. And some of them are very successful career ladies, so they should be, if they want that.
Some don't, but they want to work and have a work life balance. They are going to have to face the fact that high pressure employers are not going to look on this as a benefit to the company, and I think that is at least understood.
The ultra feminists who may try and palm this off as sexist male agenda are nuts anyway and you can see them a mile off.
Modifié par AllegedVixEo, 19 septembre 2012 - 08:49 .
AllegedVixEo wrote...
billy the squid wrote...
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
billy the squid wrote...
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
Women earn less money than men at the same job? Really? Can you please let me in on that lucrative class action lawsuit.
When women earn less money relative to men it's because they choose less demanding careers. Nobody is out to get them.
Facepalm
No. because generally men are more assertive, pushy and demanding when it comes to pay so get better negotiated salaries. Let's face it may of us in the legal and business sector are jerks. Factor in maternity leave and paid time off if they have kids. Yeah your employer won't promote you to the same degree. It's not sexism it's because you took time off, which cost your employer.
Please do not make me school you in employment law. It's very late and I really don't want to dig out my statute book and qoute legislation to you.
In other words men are better at what they do and their pay scale and promotions reflect that?
It's not my fault women bought into the idea that they can have it all (career and family). Life is about priorities.
Not necessarily better.
But are you going to promote someone or increase tha salary of someone who has taken months off, or will in the future and you have to pick up the slack as the employer? No. And woman has said they should have it all. It's a,life choice, some very successful wome do give up having children, some don't want them and some only take the minimum maternity leave before getting back to work. And some of them are very successful career ladies, so they should be, if they want that.
Some don't, but they want to work and have a work life balance. They are going to have to face the fact that high pressure employers are not going to look on this as a benefit to the company, and I think that is at least understood.
The ultra feminists who may try and palm this off as sexist male agenda are nuts anyway and you can see them a mile off.
This doesn't make it right to treat women unfairly. I am a woman. I have no children and I make much less than I should in my position, much less than the average in my region, but I work in the private sector and fewer women are working at my level. I am no less likely to take time off than a man, In fact, I haven't taken a sick day in all of 2012. My boss, a man, predominently works from home.
Men also may have the option of paternity leave. By nature, men have more testosterone. Testosterone influences aggression. By nature, men are more likely to get in a fight with a coworker at work, get in trouble for sexual harassment, or break an arm because they decided xtreme unicycling looked like a good idea. Men are just as much, if not more, of a liability then women, but because of gender stereotypes people think it's okay to treat women differently because the physiology of their body allows for the creation of human life? That's bull****. Employers choose to focus on what aspect of being a woman that is none of their business anyway and use it to hold back an entire faction of people. Pure and utter bull****.
Modifié par billy the squid, 19 septembre 2012 - 08:51 .
OniTYME wrote...
So I make a thread dissecting the rgb or questioning BW's behavior and it gets closed. But white power can make one and it gets to page 5.
K bsn
OniTYME wrote...
So I make a thread dissecting the rgb or questioning BW's behavior and it gets closed. But white power can make one and it gets to page 5.
K bsn
Modifié par Binary_Helix 1, 19 septembre 2012 - 08:57 .
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Still looking like an idiot.
How about you actually try and refute something or are you afraid I'll mentally squash you?
From what I've seen of you in this thread? No, I'm not afraid of being mentally squashed by you in the least.
I'm still awaiting for an actual rebuttal. Until I get one shut the **** up.
billy the squid wrote...
AllegedVixEo wrote...
billy the squid wrote...
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
billy the squid wrote...
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
Women earn less money than men at the same job? Really? Can you please let me in on that lucrative class action lawsuit.
When women earn less money relative to men it's because they choose less demanding careers. Nobody is out to get them.
Facepalm
No. because generally men are more assertive, pushy and demanding when it comes to pay so get better negotiated salaries. Let's face it may of us in the legal and business sector are jerks. Factor in maternity leave and paid time off if they have kids. Yeah your employer won't promote you to the same degree. It's not sexism it's because you took time off, which cost your employer.
Please do not make me school you in employment law. It's very late and I really don't want to dig out my statute book and qoute legislation to you.
In other words men are better at what they do and their pay scale and promotions reflect that?
It's not my fault women bought into the idea that they can have it all (career and family). Life is about priorities.
Not necessarily better.
But are you going to promote someone or increase tha salary of someone who has taken months off, or will in the future and you have to pick up the slack as the employer? No. And woman has said they should have it all. It's a,life choice, some very successful wome do give up having children, some don't want them and some only take the minimum maternity leave before getting back to work. And some of them are very successful career ladies, so they should be, if they want that.
Some don't, but they want to work and have a work life balance. They are going to have to face the fact that high pressure employers are not going to look on this as a benefit to the company, and I think that is at least understood.
The ultra feminists who may try and palm this off as sexist male agenda are nuts anyway and you can see them a mile off.
This doesn't make it right to treat women unfairly. I am a woman. I have no children and I make much less than I should in my position, much less than the average in my region, but I work in the private sector and fewer women are working at my level. I am no less likely to take time off than a man, In fact, I haven't taken a sick day in all of 2012. My boss, a man, predominently works from home.
Men also may have the option of paternity leave. By nature, men have more testosterone. Testosterone influences aggression. By nature, men are more likely to get in a fight with a coworker at work, get in trouble for sexual harassment, or break an arm because they decided xtreme unicycling looked like a good idea. Men are just as much, if not more, of a liability then women, but because of gender stereotypes people think it's okay to treat women differently because the physiology of their body allows for the creation of human life? That's bull****. Employers choose to focus on what aspect of being a woman that is none of their business anyway and use it to hold back an entire faction of people. Pure and utter bull****.
Then learn to be a pushy, over assertive, confident jerk like the rest of us when it comes to salary negotiation. And xtreme unicycling is a genius idea, I have no idea what you are talking about.
Modifié par AllegedVixEo, 19 septembre 2012 - 09:08 .
Bones 6oS wrote...
![]()
Your argument is invalid, billy wins.
Modifié par billy the squid, 19 septembre 2012 - 09:20 .
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
OniTYME wrote...
So I make a thread dissecting the rgb or questioning BW's behavior and it gets closed. But white power can make one and it gets to page 5.
K bsn
White power? So any pride in European or western achievement is racism?
Tell that to the billions around the world inoculated against polio.
Modifié par AllegedVixEo, 19 septembre 2012 - 09:36 .
Baa Baa wrote...
Really?
Fight Club should have done that for you.
AllegedVixEo wrote...
Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
OniTYME wrote...
So I make a thread dissecting the rgb or questioning BW's behavior and it gets closed. But white power can make one and it gets to page 5.
K bsn
White power? So any pride in European or western achievement is racism?
Tell that to the billions around the world inoculated against polio.
Speaking of Polio, Elizabeth Kenny, a woman, was one of the first people to discover therapeutic interventions for it in the early to mid 1900s. Her findings became key principles in the creation of 'physical therapy', and while her treatment showed and proved against polio, she was not respected in the medical field my comtemporary doctors.
Also, she treated Alan Alda when he was little. So M*A*S*H.
This thread is making me feel like I have polio...*wipes drool* somehow, I morphed from a passionate person into a commercial for Bing.
Modifié par Binary_Helix 1, 19 septembre 2012 - 10:13 .
And tons of what was suffered through history is thanks to (white) males too, including women's limited access to education in the past compared to men, in case you even considered why most inventions came from them. History is what it is. No one should blame you for being born a man, however, denying that they were priviliged (especially white males) throughout history is pointless since it is simply a fact. How can the modern world rectify old mistakes if it doesn't admit them?Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
While that may be true I'm sick of this "evil white male" crap when most of what we enjoy today was invented by them.
IsaacShep wrote...
And tons of what was suffered through history is thanks to (white) males too, including women's limited access to education in the past compared to men, in case you even considered why most inventions came from them. History is what it is. No one should blame you for being born a man, however, denying that they were priviliged (especially white males) throughout history is pointless since it is simply a fact. How can the modern world rectify old mistakes if it doesn't admit them?Binary_Helix 1 wrote...
While that may be true I'm sick of this "evil white male" crap when most of what we enjoy today was invented by them.
But back to video games and ME - the number of female gamers, including in the core market, increases every year. The girls are not 'faking it'. They're simply becoming more interested in it as the industry offers them more - be it via casual games, or female pratagonists, or an ability to play as a female in ME. And that won't change even if you keep repeating how games are "evolutionary for boys". Clearly, it is being proved that they're not. So the only thing you can do is like I said in the beginning - accept it. Because women will surely not be asking for your permission to start playing games or gen into gaming industry.
Modifié par Binary_Helix 1, 19 septembre 2012 - 10:15 .
Guest_mayrabgood_*