397 réponses à ce sujet

[Zardoc]

ATiBotka wrote...

NO.

My Shepard would never refuse. It's stupid.

*Looks at sig*


Oh, the irony is almost palpable

[estebanus]

ATiBotka wrote...

estebanus wrote...

ATiBotka wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

JimJamBimBam wrote...

Oh dear god no. Sorry Jade, but refusal would be way, way, way too depressing to play. Seriously, you'd be watching everyone in the galaxy die for a whole game, friends, squadmates, entire species. It sounds pretty damn awful

Huh? If the "failed" refusal stays as canon, the next game would take place in the cycle after. Therefore, everyone's already dead trollolol

Everyone is dead because of Shepard. Because he/she's a moron.

Refusal is the only one where Shepard isn't a moron, in fact. It's the only ending where Shepard does what makes sense, unless you metagame, of course.

You can't beat them conventionally, you know this without metagaming.

You don't know what the hell will happen when you shoot a tube or jump into a beam without metagaming.

[Jadebaby]

ATiBotka wrote...

estebanus wrote...

ATiBotka wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

JimJamBimBam wrote...

Oh dear god no. Sorry Jade, but refusal would be way, way, way too depressing to play. Seriously, you'd be watching everyone in the galaxy die for a whole game, friends, squadmates, entire species. It sounds pretty damn awful

Huh? If the "failed" refusal stays as canon, the next game would take place in the cycle after. Therefore, everyone's already dead trollolol

Everyone is dead because of Shepard. Because he/she's a moron.

Refusal is the only one where Shepard isn't a moron, in fact. It's the only ending where Shepard does what makes sense, unless you metagame, of course.

You can't beat them conventionally, you know this without metagaming.

Leviathans would like to have a word with you.

Oh and IMO, Shepard is a moron for picking Synthesis.

[ATiBotka]

estebanus wrote...

You don't know what the hell will happen when you shoot a tube or jump into a beam without metagaming.

But i'ts worth a try.

[KiwiQuiche]

aaaaaand this is gonna become another "THIS IS BETTER END" "NO U" thread isn't it?

[ATiBotka]

Jade8aby88 wrote...


Leviathans would like to have a word with you.

Oh and IMO, Shepard is a moron for picking Synthesis.

There are few Leviathans left.

[Samtheman63]

estebanus wrote...

ATiBotka wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

JimJamBimBam wrote...

Oh dear god no. Sorry Jade, but refusal would be way, way, way too depressing to play. Seriously, you'd be watching everyone in the galaxy die for a whole game, friends, squadmates, entire species. It sounds pretty damn awful

Huh? If the "failed" refusal stays as canon, the next game would take place in the cycle after. Therefore, everyone's already dead trollolol

Everyone is dead because of Shepard. Because he/she's a moron.

Refusal is the only one where Shepard isn't a moron, in fact. It's the only ending where Shepard does what makes sense, unless you metagame, of course.

So you decided to pour the entire galaxys resources and efforts into building the cruible, you even leave earth to gather allys and support. everything you do in the game is leading to this one moment when all the fleets assemble together along side the cruicble to finally defeat the reapers.

and you DONT use it? are you ****ing mad?

you may not trust the catalyst but, pick destroy its the only way


The way I see it

1. Use the crucible - you might win you might loose
2. Don't use it - loose.

[ghost9191]

KiwiQuiche wrote...

aaaaaand this is gonna become another "THIS IS BETTER END" "NO U" thread isn't it?

[agu123]

KiwiQuiche wrote...

aaaaaand this is gonna become another "THIS IS BETTER END" "NO U" thread isn't it?

The OP made a thread saying that Refuse deserves to be the canon ending. This thread was doomed since the beginning.

[ATiBotka]

Samtheman63 wrote...

1. Use the crucible - you might win you might loose
2. Don't use it - lose.

Exactly.

[estebanus]

ATiBotka wrote...

estebanus wrote...

You don't know what the hell will happen when you shoot a tube or jump into a beam without metagaming.

But i'ts worth a try.

Come on. If you were Shepard and you just met the leader of your enemy, would you trust him if he'd suggest you'd either jump into a beam, get dissolved by gripping some handles, or shoot at a tube from which the explosion would most likely kill you, would you do it? For all you know, your actions may actually result in indoctrinating the entire galaxy, or would cause the crucible to malfunction, in which case it'd possibly destroy all organic life.

[ghost9191]

ATiBotka wrote...

Samtheman63 wrote...

1. Use the crucible - you might win you might loose
2. Don't use it - lose.

Exactly.

agree, you just launched a frontal assault on the reapers, lost and are losing a most of your ships. all of hammer was basically wiped out. there is nothing left to fight with, not really. use the crucible , the thing that was built by the races to stop the reapers.

[Jadebaby]

estebanus wrote...

ATiBotka wrote...

estebanus wrote...

ATiBotka wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

JimJamBimBam wrote...

Oh dear god no. Sorry Jade, but refusal would be way, way, way too depressing to play. Seriously, you'd be watching everyone in the galaxy die for a whole game, friends, squadmates, entire species. It sounds pretty damn awful

Huh? If the "failed" refusal stays as canon, the next game would take place in the cycle after. Therefore, everyone's already dead trollolol

Everyone is dead because of Shepard. Because he/she's a moron.

Refusal is the only one where Shepard isn't a moron, in fact. It's the only ending where Shepard does what makes sense, unless you metagame, of course.

You can't beat them conventionally, you know this without metagaming.

You don't know what the hell will happen when you shoot a tube or jump into a beam without metagaming.

Exactly, When Hackett said "There's no way we can beat them conventionally" he meant head on without any outside help. Leviathans are outside help, so would be wateva we find at Omega

[ATiBotka]

estebanus wrote...

ATiBotka wrote...

estebanus wrote...

You don't know what the hell will happen when you shoot a tube or jump into a beam without metagaming.

But i'ts worth a try.

Come on. If you were Shepard and you just met the leader of your enemy, would you trust him if he'd suggest you'd either jump into a beam, get dissolved by gripping some handles, or shoot at a tube from which the explosion would most likely kill you, would you do it? For all you know, your actions may actually result in indoctrinating the entire galaxy, or would cause the crucible to malfunction, in which case it'd possibly destroy all organic life.

Shooting the pipe is okay. Maybe it will kill everyone, but it's still worth a try.

[ATiBotka]

Jade8aby88 wrote...


Exactly, When Hackett said "There's no way we can beat them conventionally" he meant head on without any outside help. Leviathans are outside help, so would be wateva we find at Omega

The Leviathans aren't that powerful. The Catalyst killed most of them.

Modifié par ATiBotka, 19 septembre 2012 - 01:46 .

[JimJamBimBam]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

JimJamBimBam wrote...

Oh dear god no. Sorry Jade, but refusal would be way, way, way too depressing to play. Seriously, you'd be watching everyone in the galaxy die for a whole game, friends, squadmates, entire species. It sounds pretty damn awful

Huh? If the "failed" refusal stays as canon, the next game would take place in the cycle after. Therefore, everyone's already dead trollolol

No better. I'd prefer if they chose a slightly less-retarded ending to canonise, if they have to do it at all.

[Jadebaby]

agu123 wrote...

KiwiQuiche wrote...

aaaaaand this is gonna become another "THIS IS BETTER END" "NO U" thread isn't it?

The OP made a thread saying that Refuse deserves to be the canon ending. This thread was doomed since the beginning.

Nope, because Refuse, in itself, doesn't fall into the morally ambigious category. The only reason it can be seen that way currently is because of it's outcome.

[spirosz]

They should let you pick.

[xAmilli0n]

I'm all for a canon ending at this point, especially with talk of a new ME game. But unless they retconned Refuse so that everyone doesn't...you know...die...I would totally support it.

[JimJamBimBam]

spirosz wrote...

They should let you pick.

That requires making four seperate games and putting it all onto one disc. That's quite a collosal ontaking.

[ghost9191]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

agu123 wrote...

KiwiQuiche wrote...

aaaaaand this is gonna become another "THIS IS BETTER END" "NO U" thread isn't it?

The OP made a thread saying that Refuse deserves to be the canon ending. This thread was doomed since the beginning.

Nope, because Refuse, in itself, doesn't fall into the morally ambigious category. The only reason it can be seen that way currently is because of it's outcome.

yeah true, don't worry i am pretty sure that while ppl are being killed and harvested they will feel pretty damn good about shepards high moral standards 

[spirosz]

JimJamBimBam wrote...

spirosz wrote...

They should let you pick.

That requires making four seperate games and putting it all onto one disc. That's quite a collosal ontaking.

Or, you know, the game itself will only slightly change depending on what choice you pick in the beginning, it doesn't have to be drastically different, just minor differences in side quests, main quests, etc because we all know how much Bioware loves dealing with choices in their games. 

[JimJamBimBam]

spirosz wrote...

JimJamBimBam wrote...

spirosz wrote...

They should let you pick.

That requires making four seperate games and putting it all onto one disc. That's quite a collosal ontaking.

Or, you know, the game itself will only slightly change depending on what choice you pick in the beginning, it doesn't have to be drastically different, just minor differences in side quests, main quests, etc because we all know how much Bioware loves dealing with choices in their games. 

Sorry pal, but the four endings are so damn different that it would have to be more than just 'minor differences'. I mean, in one you've got a society that is policed by giant robot octopi. That means that any sort of collosal threat we have to face is immediately quelled. In another, we don't even have these robots anymore. In yet another, all the species we know from Mass Effect are dead, whilst in the other three, they are alive and thriving. And this isn't even taking into account things that we see in the EC slides, like the Krogan becoming extinct/going to war, the destruction of the Geth/Quarians or the Rachni. There's far too much variation to be viable.

[agu123]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

agu123 wrote...

KiwiQuiche wrote...

aaaaaand this is gonna become another "THIS IS BETTER END" "NO U" thread isn't it?

The OP made a thread saying that Refuse deserves to be the canon ending. This thread was doomed since the beginning.

Nope, because Refuse, in itself, doesn't fall into the morally ambigious category. The only reason it can be seen that way currently is because of it's outcome.

Or perhaps it's because Shepard doesn't want to use the device that could stop the Catalyst right now because the options are "morally ambiguous", and he - or she - doesn't want to get their hands dirty. I doubt anyone even cares about Shepard compromising his morality in an ending such as Control.

Seriously, I've seen people saying that the Galaxy would rather die with honor instead of living after Destroy or Control.