494 réponses à ce sujet

[Wayning_Star]

Eterna5 wrote...

You guys have been trolled.

yeah, I wondered about that..maybe even many other notifications about 'canon' were as well, trollish humor.."I heard that they heard that so'n so heard that they heard that....bioware spilled the beans..big time, etc.

[Red Dust]

I heard from my cousin's best friend's uncle that he heard from his sister's coworker's niece that Shepard died while straining to push out a constipated dump, and that's the canon ending. Tali found him the next day naked and bloated on the toilet.

True story from a reliable source.

[Malanek]

Hudathan wrote...
I don't see a problem with that picture. Just because it's not what we have NOW doesn't mean it's not possible within the unknown laws of our universe. I say unknown because we know next to nothing, and trying to rule anything out based on what little we do know is actually laughable.

We already build robots and they have no need for a DNA. DNA is all about cloning and reproducing cells. I'm not saying it is impossible to do something similar with inorganic compounds, but unless it reprduces cells (from consumed mass) in a similar fashion there is no purpose. The Geth for instance would not have DNA. As I said above synthesis and genetic engineering are NOT the same thing.

You may also note that from a scientific point of view Synthesis breaks the law of conservation of mass. Simply splicing something into an entities gentic code cannot replace all the existing cells in that entity. Every particle has to come from somewhere.

[GreyLycanTrope]

Malanek999 wrote...

Again though, your original comment was that we already do this. We don't.

My original comment was that we genetically modefeid crops I made no mention of how we did so. I was drawing a comparison of established practices (genetic manipulation of crops) not exact methods of emplying those practices (genetic manipulation through synthetic augmentations).

Modifié par Greylycantrope, 20 septembre 2012 - 03:12 .

[GreyLycanTrope]

Hudathan wrote...
I don't see a problem with that picture. Just because it's not what we have NOW doesn't mean it's not possible within the unknown laws of our universe. I say unknown because we know next to nothing, and trying to rule anything out based on what little we do know is actually laughable.

What's laughable is what the new DNA represents "final evolution", Darwin would be ashamed.

[Shermos]

Master Xanthan wrote...

Synthesis would be a terrible canon ending.

Better than Destroy.

[EnvyTB075]

Well thats a little bit ****.

Shermos wrote...

Master Xanthan wrote...

Synthesis would be a terrible canon ending.

Better than Destroy.

No it isn't.

[Wayning_Star]

Greylycantrope wrote...

Hudathan wrote...
I don't see a problem with that picture. Just because it's not what we have NOW doesn't mean it's not possible within the unknown laws of our universe. I say unknown because we know next to nothing, and trying to rule anything out based on what little we do know is actually laughable.

What's laughable is what the new DNA represents "final evolution", Darwin would be ashamed.

actually Darwin is off by a few clicks, according to newer concepts..but the basis of it is accepted..with caution.

the final evolution is for the synthetics,not organics who created them...accidently on purpose..like fauna on a planet?!?

Tools, can't live with'em,cannot exist without'em...

[eddieoctane]

Master Xanthan wrote...

Synthesis would be a terrible canon ending.

And Jess is a terrible PR rep.

[habitat 67]

If Synthesis is the true ending, why did I bother killing Saren?

[eddieoctane]

habitat 67 wrote...

If Synthesis is the true ending, why did I bother killing Saren?

Because BioWare wants to make you understand that finishing ME1, and playing through the entirety of ME2 and 3 was really just a huge mistake.

Modifié par eddieoctane, 20 septembre 2012 - 04:07 .

[Wayning_Star]

habitat 67 wrote...

If Synthesis is the true ending, why did I bother killing Saren?

Cause Saren thought he could control the reapers with cyborg attatchments. He was indoctrinated into blieveing that his 'being' meant something to the reaper at large. He was greedy too, figured he'd get a kingship out of the deal. That's what the reapers used to indoctrinate him.

I had to be really a heavy renegade to talk him into self termination..but ended up fighting a assumed creature, invention of the reaper.

It wasn't synthesis tho, just a cyborged delusional... an alien illusive man wanna be..as it were.

[Wayning_Star]

Malanek999 wrote...

Hudathan wrote...
I don't see a problem with that picture. Just because it's not what we have NOW doesn't mean it's not possible within the unknown laws of our universe. I say unknown because we know next to nothing, and trying to rule anything out based on what little we do know is actually laughable.

We already build robots and they have no need for a DNA. DNA is all about cloning and reproducing cells. I'm not saying it is impossible to do something similar with inorganic compounds, but unless it reprduces cells (from consumed mass) in a similar fashion there is no purpose. The Geth for instance would not have DNA. As I said above synthesis and genetic engineering are NOT the same thing.

You may also note that from a scientific point of view Synthesis breaks the law of conservation of mass. Simply splicing something into an entities gentic code cannot replace all the existing cells in that entity. Every particle has to come from somewhere.

you forgot to mention Eezo and the ability in the MEU to alter timespace.. our physics are a bit behind the times there as well.. Black holes make Einstein theories go gaga.. not to meantion they utilize dark energy to run the relays and other stuff there as well...We're out of our league as novice physists..lol

[N7 Lisbeth]

I've suddenly lost all interest in Mass Effect 4, if this nonsense about Synthesis being made canon is true.

[teh DRUMPf!!]

I learned after ME3 not to put anything past the Bioware team.

I'm a synthesizer but I just don't give a damn what they canonize. If it looks interesting, I'll humor it.

[Kia Purity]

At this point I just want Merizan to stop talking because anything comes out of her mouth will always ****** off someone.

Even though I'm taking this with a grain of salt, it's just the recent trend with how she's answering things on twitter and at cons.

[TNT1991]

If they want synthesis to happen either way (through other means besides catalyst) , then that's fine by me as long as my Shepard is alive and the reapers are destroyed--you know, since destroy is what I'd (and other fans) picked, and witnessed that cliffhanger -ugh- breath scene that might "lead to something".

If not, then why bother giving us a choice in the first place.

[hukbum]

TNT1991 wrote...
If they want synthesis to happen either way (through other means besides catalyst) , then that's fine by me as long as my Shepard is alive and the reapers are destroyed--you know, since destroy is what I'd (and other fans) picked, and witnessed that cliffhanger -ugh- breath scene that might "lead to something".

Hmm ... did they (the Reapers) blow up, or just fall to the ground?

[The Twilight God]

It isn't saying ME3's synthesis ending is canon. Just that synthesis will occur on our own terms in the distant future. I doubt being indoctrinated reaper hand puppets is canon.

Modifié par The Twilight God, 20 septembre 2012 - 05:27 .

[dorktainian]

if synthesis is the 'true' ending then that just confirms to me that the whole series was utterly pointless, and that the point of buying into another mass effect game just disappeared.

yeah i know its green and pretty..... also utterly utterly repugnant in its ideals.

Forced mergers with anything synthetic?

good job. not.

[InvincibleHero]

Han Shot First wrote...

Back when those comments from Jessica Merizan were first posted, I created this poll asking people if they'd be interested in Mass Effect 4 if synthesis was canon.

'No' is winning in a landslide.

I don't usually vote in polls but thought it was important to vote no to that question. Synthesis is too far fetched and immoral.

[MissMaster_2]

I don't listen to anything she says.

[tyrvas]

This was my reply...

tyrvas wrote...

Mass Effect 4: Synthesis is Inevitable

... in the following thread; How do you make ME4 a sequel without invalidating ME3?

Modifié par tyrvas, 20 septembre 2012 - 05:57 .

[LilLino]

Isn't Synthesis supposed to be 'peace&love' for everyone style of ending? Altering everyone in such a way that all beings are same/equal and don't feel the need to be evil/mean, so they coop co-work till the end of times?

That's the vibe I got from both the epilogue and catalyst speech. If there's still war after Synthesis then this ending is even worse than I've always thought lol.

I completely don't get Bioware's fascination with mind&body f*cking entire galaxy just because your arch enemy says that's right. It's inhuman choice, it's agreeing that our very being is flawed and has to be altered in order to function. Honestly wtf is this.

But seriously destroy/control are much, much better for a sequel.
Especially destroy has endless possibilities.

Modifié par LilLino, 20 septembre 2012 - 06:53 .

[clennon8]

Somebody just stab this franchise in the heart and put it of its misery. Please.