8 réponses à ce sujet

[garrusfan1]

 All right a lot of people didn't like DA2 (I thought it was decent) but honestly it wasn't the people that were making it's fault they were given little time and it showed that  they were rushed. All right DA3 has been in development for a while from what I heard and from what I heard it will be released in late 2013  so they are given plenty of time to make it. I just hope it will be for 360 or I won't be able to get it for a while. But I have I hopes for it anyone else

[frostajulie]

I hope you are right.

[LobselVith8]

I think making the mage antagonists into caricatures, giving no depth to the templar antagonists, having bad paraphrasing and an inaccurate dialogue wheel, and forcing the protagonist to be religiously Andrastian were facets that were consciously chosen and defended by the developers. Gaider actually claimed there were no insane mages in Dragon Age II, despite the plethora of insane and stupid mages in Kirkwall. I'm not certain if Dragon Age III will be good, but I'm not pleased with what I've heard about so far.

[EmperorSahlertz]

You have a very liberal definition of the word "insane". I can't recall a single mage from DA2 being downright insane gibbering madmen. Sure a whole bunch of them were misguided or selfish, or any combination of other unsavory traits. But I don't recall any of them being actually insane.

[DPSSOC]

Not even the one who thought he could bring his wife back by Frankensteining her out of other women?

[EmperorSahlertz]

He killed a lot of women, and succeeded in binding their spirits within corpses. Can you proove that he would be incapable of binding the spirit of his wife, within that created shell? He may have been deranged, selfish and downright psychopathic, but insane? No.

[DPSSOC]

To be fair we only know he was able to bind one, Leandra, the only one who can actually communicate. As for binding his wife's spirit if the Cardinal Rules of Magic hold then no he can't. Unless he bound her soul at time of death it's gone, lost to the ether.

Also deranged and psychopathic but not insane? How the hell does that work.

[Xilizhra]

Technically, "insane" is a legal term, not a clinical one. Basically it means that one is too mentally unbalanced to comprehend that they may have done something wrong, and hence aren't truly responsible for their actions. For instance, a paranoid schizophrenic may believe that his next-door neighbor was a sentient gargoyle planning to swoop down and eat him one night, and thus not only feel completely justified in smashing his head open with a hammer, but not knowing why everyone else is somehow upset about the gargoyle monster being killed. That would be legally insane.

Modifié par Xilizhra, 29 septembre 2012 - 04:20 .