Aller au contenu

Photo

The EMS system rather sabotaged ME3's core plot


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
269 réponses à ce sujet

#251
Fixers0

Fixers0
  • Members
  • 4 434 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

Let me be more clear for you,...
Saying this is a retcon is like say the reaper built the mass relay is a retcon to the statement the prothean built it. They found more info on mars that lead to finding more chambers. That not a retcon, that just adding more info.


If one piece of Fiction (Mass Effect 3) changes what was established before (Mass Effect 1) it´s a retcon, deal with it.


dreman9999 wrote...
It would be like saying Mordin recons what Wrex stated in ME1.


Which is kind of true.

dreman9999 wrote...
Or the geth having two factions in ME2 retcon the fact the geth are enemies in ME1.


Which is also kind of true, though far less contrived as the narative never specifically stated if there were different geth factions.

Modifié par Fixers0, 21 septembre 2012 - 09:04 .


#252
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

Fixers0 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Let me be more clear for you,...
Saying this is a retcon is like say the reaper built the mass relay is a retcon to the statement the prothean built it. They found more info on mars that lead to finding more chambers. That not a retcon, that just adding more info.


If one piece of Fiction (Mass Effect 3) changes what was established before (Mass Effect 1) it´s a retcon, deal with it.


dreman9999 wrote...
It would be like saying Mordin recons what Wrex stated in ME1.


Which is kind of true.

dreman9999 wrote...
Or the geth having two factions in ME2 retcon the fact the geth are enemies in ME1.


Which is also kind of true, though far less contrived as the narative never specifically stated if there were different geth factions.


Fixer0 it's clear you don't know what a retcon is. Those are not retcons...None of it.

#253
AngryFrozenWater

AngryFrozenWater
  • Members
  • 9 150 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

AngryFrozenWater wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

AngryFrozenWater wrote...
You can try to add negative traits to my reasoning, like being stubburn or accuse me of dreaming up a conspiracy. It's a cheap attemp to invalidate the arguments. That doesn't work with me, sir. You have to do better than that ;)

I don't have to do better than that. You do, because you are the one positing an alternate take on an established fact. Explain who or what would be responsible for destroying the Crucible concept during the Reaper cycle if not the Reapers.

No I don't. I am trying to have a friendly conversation here. Don't make it unpleasant.

You assume that the brat and/or the reapers destroyed the plans for the Crucible. But there is no proof of that. We simply don't know who destroyed those.

The is als noproof that they planned the crucible , yet your say they did. The only witness is the catalyst. Based on how the crucible is build and how the catalyst thinks, it clear they would never plann it.

Just like a gun, which is based on technology which the reapers dropped, and still is considered to be created by organics, the Crucible could be based on plans and refinements the reapers dropped. Is there proof of that? No. Is there proof that organics created the entire device? No. However, there are indications that the reapers were involved. First, because it works with the reaper built Citadel and mass relays, the Crucible must use reaper technology to do whatever it was designed to do. Their eugenics experiments failed in the past, but somehow the brat ensures us that this time synthesis will work. That's again very odd, don't you think? Also, given the elevator, bridges and docking platform the Citadel has to be adapted for the whole scene up there. The brat claims that the Citadel is its home and that the Citadel is part of the brat. So, any alterations made to the Citadel have to be noticed by either the brat or the keepers. Yet, they didn't notice any of these constructions. Or they constructed these themselves. Take your pick.

#254
Cainne Chapel

Cainne Chapel
  • Members
  • 2 301 messages
But then fixers the point would be NOTHING at all is good writing due to most writing have some contrivance SOMEWHERE within the story.

Unfortnately I've never read or watched anything that was 100 percent perfect, ever. So does that make everything bad writing?

#255
Guest_Paulomedi_*

Guest_Paulomedi_*
  • Guests

LucasShark wrote...

That's going to be a bit of a controvercial title, but honestly how else do you keep something on these boards, and it's more or less the case in my eyes.  Hear me out here:

On paper, EMS seems like a good way of tieing in all the disparet plot threads of ME1 and ME2 into a single system.  By assigning what amount to scores to each choice, the game simplifies requirements for the victory conditions.  This does however, introduce problems which ME3 doesn't really adress.

The first is mechanical in nature: what exactly IS 1 unit of EMS?  This makes no sense, it is comparing actual hardware, to troops, to scientists, to reporters.  All of these things do work toward a total war style of strategy, but they aren't comperable on a uni-linier scale.  How for instance is one reporter worth 1/15th of an N7 operative?  And so forth.  It's not just comparing apples to oranges here, it's comparing apples, to goldfish, to spanners, to pocket-change.

The second problem is one of choices versus problems: giving a choice a score, makes it not a choice.  This is going to sound weird to some but hold on, I'll explain.  A choice and a problem sound simmilar, but are very different things.  You know when you chose what colour Shepard's hair was?  That was a choice.  You know when you chose whether to let Balek live, or sacrafice the colony to chase him in bring down the sky?  That was a good example of a choice.  Yes, one is the paragon, one is the renegade, but it was a choice.  There wasn't really (maybe in some loot) an objectively better choice.  When it comes to EMS, we suddenly turn most things into problems, at least as far as the game is concerned.  If a choice yeilds two different EMS scores, the technically (again, only mechanically) the "right" one is the one which yields the higher score.  It's like choosing gear in Diablo, does this raise my DPS?  Yes: equip, no: sell or recover crafting materials.

The third problem is one of contrivance: aka, the scavenger hunts we get sent on in leu of sidequests.  Scanning the galaxy not only has a risk now, but has no real reward of on-foot missions.  Rather the game has to contrive reasons to have EMS note-worthy things just laying about on planets somewhere.  Possibly the most hillarious incodent of this was a bloody alliance dreadnought just kind of sitting out there.  "hey fellas!  You found me!  I guess I'll join the fight."  How many dreadnoughts were there in the Alliance Navy again?  Less than a dozen!  I'd imagine those were kept track of.

The last, and biggest problem for ME3's ending, is that it divorces these sub plots from the overall plot, and most importantly, its resolution.  There's a reason we don't see our war assets in action: they are at this point, only a number.  The only way the ending really could include EMS is with a mono-linier "good" to "bad" result, with arbitrary numbers marking each.  By choosing this model over a "suicide mission style" ending, ME3 effectively made a lot of our choices meaningless in its own conclusion.  In this respect, the ending was no longer a culmination of all our choices up to that point (what was promised by the way), but down to us at the last minute, Fable II style.  This was not what we were promised.

It's down to this fact; that ME3 effectively produces a conclusion to its own story rather than to the ME story, which is a major contributer in my mind to the backlash.


LucasShark, you are asking for a different game. A better one.

To implement this they would have to give themselves another year or two of development, and at least more ten hours of gameplay

#256
Cainne Chapel

Cainne Chapel
  • Members
  • 2 301 messages

Fixers0 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Let me be more clear for you,...
Saying this is a retcon is like say the reaper built the mass relay is a retcon to the statement the prothean built it. They found more info on mars that lead to finding more chambers. That not a retcon, that just adding more info.


If one piece of Fiction (Mass Effect 3) changes what was established before (Mass Effect 1) it´s a retcon, deal with it.


dreman9999 wrote...
It would be like saying Mordin recons what Wrex stated in ME1.


Which is kind of true.

dreman9999 wrote...
Or the geth having two factions in ME2 retcon the fact the geth are enemies in ME1.


Which is also kind of true, though far less contrived as the narative never specifically stated if there were different geth factions.


But thats the thing Fixers
1) ME3 didn't change anything it added to it.  yes it was a small data cache. but compared to WHAT exactly? Whats the difference between what we think is small and what is large? Its obvious they had labs in place to study it, so how is added more info figured out from the data cache a retcon?



and the geth having two factions its contrived OR a retcon, no more so than Humans having more than one group representing one ideal.  Sure they're synthetic but who is to say there aren't more out there with altering agendas?

Face it, in order to draw out 2 more games, stuff had to be added to the universe of course.  Doesnt mean they're retcons, they are just "expanding" the universe from the small picture we got of it in one game

#257
Netsfn1427

Netsfn1427
  • Members
  • 184 messages

Fixers0 wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

I meant that the LotR contrivance is more important than the ME3 mars archive one.


Conjecture.


CronoDragoon wrote...
And contrivance alone is not enough to make something bad writing, sorry.


Unfortuantly, it does.


This just wreaks of "I don't like a story, so I'm going to find a literary reason to tear it apart. That literary reason might exist in 95% of other works of fiction, but I'm going to overlook it in those stories, because I like those stories."

There are flaws in the ME3 story. But so much of the critiques are nitpicky. ME3 is being held to a standard that no other Bioware game has been held to, just because the endings are disliked. 

#258
Netsfn1427

Netsfn1427
  • Members
  • 184 messages

AngryFrozenWater wrote...

Just like a gun, which is based on technology which the reapers dropped, and still is considered to be created by organics, the Crucible could be based on plans and refinements the reapers dropped. Is there proof of that? No. Is there proof that organics created the entire device? No. However, there are indications that the reapers were involved. First, because it works with the reaper built Citadel and mass relays, the Crucible must use reaper technology to do whatever it was designed to do. Their eugenics experiments failed in the past, but somehow the brat ensures us that this time synthesis will work. That's again very odd, don't you think? Also, given the elevator, bridges and docking platform the Citadel has to be adapted for the whole scene up there. The brat claims that the Citadel is its home and that the Citadel is part of the brat. So, any alterations made to the Citadel have to be noticed by either the brat or the keepers. Yet, they didn't notice any of these constructions. Or they constructed these themselves. Take your pick.


Other races have some idea of the Catalyst. The Prothean V.I. mentions it. It's entirely possible the original plans, whoever made them, was aware of the Catalyst, and the fact that the Citadel is connected to the relay network, thus built the Crucible with that in mind. In other words, the Citadel isn't changed. The Crucible is built to use the existing framework of the Citadel and alter bits of programming with the Catalyst.The Crucible changes the Catalyst and there's every reason to suspect this is one of the Crucible's goals. I mean if the Crucible needs the Catalyst to fire, then it had better make the Catalyst willing.

#259
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

Fixers0 wrote...

Conjecture.


You don't think a contrivance that affects 3 parts of a trilogy is more important than one that affects 1 part of a trilogy?

Unfortuantly, it does.


Do you think ME1 and ME2 have good writing? I do, but by your standards I could rip them to shreds.

#260
AngryFrozenWater

AngryFrozenWater
  • Members
  • 9 150 messages

Netsfn1427 wrote...

AngryFrozenWater wrote...

Just like a gun, which is based on technology which the reapers dropped, and still is considered to be created by organics, the Crucible could be based on plans and refinements the reapers dropped. Is there proof of that? No. Is there proof that organics created the entire device? No. However, there are indications that the reapers were involved. First, because it works with the reaper built Citadel and mass relays, the Crucible must use reaper technology to do whatever it was designed to do. Their eugenics experiments failed in the past, but somehow the brat ensures us that this time synthesis will work. That's again very odd, don't you think? Also, given the elevator, bridges and docking platform the Citadel has to be adapted for the whole scene up there. The brat claims that the Citadel is its home and that the Citadel is part of the brat. So, any alterations made to the Citadel have to be noticed by either the brat or the keepers. Yet, they didn't notice any of these constructions. Or they constructed these themselves. Take your pick.

Other races have some idea of the Catalyst. The Prothean V.I. mentions it. It's entirely possible the original plans, whoever made them, was aware of the Catalyst, and the fact that the Citadel is connected to the relay network, thus built the Crucible with that in mind. In other words, the Citadel isn't changed. The Crucible is built to use the existing framework of the Citadel and alter bits of programming with the Catalyst.The Crucible changes the Catalyst and there's every reason to suspect this is one of the Crucible's goals. I mean if the Crucible needs the Catalyst to fire, then it had better make the Catalyst willing.

I am aware that there are several interpretations of what we know. I just state my interpretation. It's not fact. Just as your interpretation is based on assumptions. You have a lot of them there. Don't get me wrong. It's not that you may not be correct, but for me it is not safe to assume you are, because my interpretation does not contradict the observations.

Here are some counter arguments:

The prothean VI on Thessia simply states that the Catalyst is the Citadel. It doesn't tell us that the Catalyst is a being. It also tells us that the reapers may have a master, but it tells Shepard that the master is unknown. So the protheans didn't make the connection that the Catalyst was an AI who controlled the reapers. If the protheans thought so then the VI would know, because it was supposed to have the memory of Pashek Vran - prothean overseer of the Crucible project.

The brat tells us that Shepard is the first organic ever who visited that location. So it may have planned that for a long time. The routine it developed to deal with the Crucible was never activated before, but obviously the Crucible's presence changes the variables and thus the routine is activated. Hence, the Crucible changed the brat in that way.

The Citadel itself is changed to allow docking of the Crucible and the talk with the brat and Shepard. The elevator (which carries the wounded Shepard upstairs), the three bridges (two close immediately after the talk) and the docking platforms are part of the Citadel and had to be build for those purposes. Note that I do not suggest that the three input devices are part of the Citadel, just the platforms they are standing on are. The timing of the elevator and the opening of the bridges is perfect. It suggests that the brat controls them and allows Shepard to use the Crucible. It also claims that the three options are new solutions for its hypothetical problem. So the brat is clearly not a victim of the Crucible. It's not a weapon. Besides, a weapon does not need the consent of its victim to be fired.

The brat is willing to use the Crucible. It doesn't object at all. After all, the three options are presented as new solutions to its hypothetical problem. And that's not odd, because, given the above observations, everything matches its intentions. It even gets angry when you refuse to use the Crucible and the cycle continues.

Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 21 septembre 2012 - 10:40 .


#261
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 790 messages

CronoDragoon wrote...

AngryFrozenWater wrote...
Nah. You don't know that. But even if that was the case then my other points still stand.


None of your points matter so long as you don't deal with the fact that the Catalyst flat-out tells us he has been trying to destroy the Crucible, and even thought he succeeded a few cycles ago.


Not to mention that the Reapers are, you know, shooting at the thing.

How come we're discussing bizarre headcanon, anyway? I thought this was an EMS thread.

Modifié par AlanC9, 21 septembre 2012 - 10:40 .


#262
AngryFrozenWater

AngryFrozenWater
  • Members
  • 9 150 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

AngryFrozenWater wrote...
Nah. You don't know that. But even if that was the case then my other points still stand.

None of your points matter so long as you don't deal with the fact that the Catalyst flat-out tells us he has been trying to destroy the Crucible, and even thought he succeeded a few cycles ago.

Not to mention that the Reapers are, you know, shooting at the thing.

How come we're discussing bizarre headcanon, anyway? I thought this was an EMS thread.

Isn't it wonderful? Ghehe. But you are correct. I am sure another thread will allow such a discussion. ;)

BTW: I've just checked. The reapers are not shooting at it. In the scene before TIM and during docking no reapers are near. ;)

Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 21 septembre 2012 - 11:06 .


#263
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 790 messages
So someone else is shooting at it? It gets damaged somehow. Not to mention destroyed, though that might not happen anymore post-EC.

Modifié par AlanC9, 21 septembre 2012 - 11:15 .


#264
AngryFrozenWater

AngryFrozenWater
  • Members
  • 9 150 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

So someone else is shooting at it? It gets damaged somehow. Not to mention destroyed, though that might not happen anymore post-EC.

I thought you didn't want to continue this. Ghehe. Look at the two scenes. The first just before TIM's confrontation and the second when the Crucible docks. No reapers there shooting at it. It is damaged when you do not have enough EMS - as in not completely finished.

Edit: You'll see fire and explosions in the background. But all that is happening on or near Earth. Both scenes can be viewed in this video.

Edit2: With low EMS the Crucible is targeted. Which is visible here. The brats respons is also different. In that case it greets Shepard with "Why are you here?" instead of a friendly "Wake up". It is as if the brat prefers the Crucible to be completed, i.e. a high EMS rating.

Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 22 septembre 2012 - 11:38 .


#265
Vigilant111

Vigilant111
  • Members
  • 2 479 messages

CronoDragoon wrote...

AngryFrozenWater wrote...

Sorry. It doesn't state that all. All the brat tells us is that it thought the plans were eradicated. It didn't tell who did that. ;)


You are just being stubborn now. "We had thought the concept eradicated a few cycles ago" somehow opens the door for "maybe it wasn't the Reapers guys!"

Conspiracy theories are powerful, indeed.


"We BELIEVED the concept had been eraticated" when asked "why didn't you stop it?", so by logic, they are well aware of the Crucible and allowed it to dock because the Catalyst knows that slinter groups have made some changes to the Crucible, changes that are acceptable to it, despite the remaining function of destroy

#266
mass perfection

mass perfection
  • Members
  • 2 253 messages
I think that you should only be able to import chars. from multiplayer for more EMS once.

#267
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

Vigilant111 wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

AngryFrozenWater wrote...

Sorry. It doesn't state that all. All the brat tells us is that it thought the plans were eradicated. It didn't tell who did that. ;)


You are just being stubborn now. "We had thought the concept eradicated a few cycles ago" somehow opens the door for "maybe it wasn't the Reapers guys!"

Conspiracy theories are powerful, indeed.


"We BELIEVED the concept had been eraticated" when asked "why didn't you stop it?", so by logic, they are well aware of the Crucible and allowed it to dock because the Catalyst knows that slinter groups have made some changes to the Crucible, changes that are acceptable to it, despite the remaining function of destroy

The problem with that is that they catalyst tried to stoppe the ground team form going in with harbinger. It make nosanse to try and stop them from going in if they are letting the crucilbe be used.

#268
Vigilant111

Vigilant111
  • Members
  • 2 479 messages

Netsfn1427 wrote...

Did you want to be locked out of a choice based on an earlier decision? Or did you want a single ending with many variations based on EMS and in game choices?


Is this a trick question? look at the bolded text, you wanted me to say "oh no I don't want to be locked out", right?

The thing is that you DO get locked out from certain actions based on earlier decisions, noticeably in ME1 where if you do not maintain a healthy reputation bar, and this compels gamers to come back for another playthrough to correct the wrongs

#269
Vigilant111

Vigilant111
  • Members
  • 2 479 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

We are animals...Just advanced animals. Your point?


I think his point is that we are all the same

#270
Vigilant111

Vigilant111
  • Members
  • 2 479 messages

dreman9999 wrote...
The problem with that is that they catalyst tried to stoppe the ground team form going in with harbinger. It make nosanse to try and stop them from going in if they are letting the crucilbe be used.


I am sorry I understand your point but I don't see its relevance, since if they really try to stop allied forces from going in, they should just deactivate the ascending beam, but no, harbinger left right on que and it did not see a ship as large as the Normandy at all