109 réponses à ce sujet

[The Six Path of Pain]

No!

[LPPrince]

NO.

The less Hawke, the better the game. Would much rather the Warden be in the game than Hawke.

But perhaps its best if both are excluded.

[burning salaradile]

There are really two sides to my opinion on this.

I don't want protagonists to just keep disappearing at the end of their stories. It makes for rather bad endings and doesn't really make sense. (Why wouldn't a Human Noble King/Queen of Ferelden stay and do their job?)

That being said, there are huge possibilities for out of character moments of your previous character shows up again not under your control. It would be very easy for me to think, "My Hawke wouldn't do that."

So I'm not really sure there's any good way to resolve this. The protagonists could have to die at the end of the story, but that wouldn't be fun if it happened every time, with no way to avoid it. The Inquisitor could be the protagonist of all future Dragon Age games... but I'm not sure that's a better solution. And we'll still be wondering whatever happened to the Warden and Hawke.

Modifié par burning salaradile, 24 septembre 2012 - 06:30 .

[panamakira]

I think at this point in the story he's more important than the Warden since he/she was right at the beginning of the conflict.

I know people don't care for Hawke but the Warden seems almost not important enough to the Mage/Templar conflict that DA3 might be based on.

Also they should make sense in the new story but they should not be playable characters. I want a new story, new hero, however BW needs to tie in the Warden, Hawke and the Inquisitor.

Modifié par panamakira, 24 septembre 2012 - 06:48 .

[Sacred_Fantasy]

Angelo2027 wrote...

  I have seen in the
forums that the warden should atleast make a cameo but I think that the game
will focus on the mages and Templars war so I was thinking that Hawke should
have a major role in this game because he was there when it all began so what
do you think should Hawke have more than a single cameo in DA3?

Hawke should be burned at stake for murdering thousand of innocents and inciting global crisis. ( Cassandra forget to inform the Divine or the Divine still think Hawke is the cause while Anders/vengence laugh for successfully manipulated Hawke. )

The Warden or spesifically The Hero of Ferelden will not return in anyway. BioWare will not be able to do it right no matter how much effort they try. She could be already dead or retired permenantly from the world of Thedas, choosing instead to journey other realms in other time. 

[HeavenStar]

Unless I can control the choice made by Hawke and the Warden, don't bring them back as NPC and automatically assume what they would do. I would really hate that unless by some providence or sheer luck Bioware manages to guess my choice(s) correctly.

But if you can control Hawke and Warden when they appear, well, that would be interesting to see. But otherwise, no.

[septembervirgin]

There should be an arena fight between Hawke and the Warden. And you know what else?

Boom, they should die. Tiax should go on to rule.

Modifié par septembervirgin, 24 septembre 2012 - 08:13 .

[The Six Path of Pain]

burning salaradile wrote...

There are really two sides to my opinion on this.

I don't want protagonists to just keep disappearing at the end of their stories. It makes for rather bad endings and doesn't really make sense. (Why wouldn't a Human Noble King/Queen of Ferelden stay and do their job?)

That being said, there are huge possibilities for out of character moments of your previous character shows up again not under your control. It would be very easy for me to think, "My Hawke wouldn't do that."

So I'm not really sure there's any good way to resolve this. The protagonists could have to die at the end of the story, but that wouldn't be fun if it happened every time, with no way to avoid it. The Inquisitor could be the protagonist of all future Dragon Age games... but I'm not sure that's a better solution. And we'll still be wondering whatever happened to the Warden and Hawke.

What if you could choose what the previous protagonist would say.EX:If you run into Hawke in DA3 and instead of auto dialogue for Hawke the conversation wheel pops up and the Diplomatic,Sarcastic,and Aggressive options appear.Or if you run into the Warden(voice or no voice)you could choose how the Warden feels about The Mage-Templar war or how Anders was one of the main reasons for it starting.

[Teddie Sage]

I am here to join my voice to the Hawkes supporters. They're just a family trying to live a simple life in the corrupted and crazy world they're living on. My sarcastic and charming rogue Hawke sided with the Mages because he always protected his sister Bethany and fell in love with Anders. 

Sure, what his lover did wasn't good to the eyes of the people, but my Hawke understood it was necessary even though he didn't approve the gesture and being manipulated. He still forgave Anders and vowed to defend his cause until the end in my headcanon, while fleeing the templars alont with Bethany and some of the Kirkwall survivors.

They found shelter near Ferelden borders before the war spread farther and decided to side with Fereldens against the Orlesean conflict. My Hawke had to stay low for a while and hid with Anders, they disguised themselves, infiltrating the armies while their friends went different ways. In the end, they participated to the war, taking fake identities, helping their loved ones from afar...

While the Inquisitor protagonist will be doing his thing, my Hawke and Anders will always be together until the end, knowing they helped making a difference in their world. They might never be with their friends again for a long while, but they know they did the right thing.

Modifié par Teddie Sage, 25 septembre 2012 - 12:55 .

[Sir George Parr]

Yes. Hawke does need to appear as Hawke is a more relevant character to have back in the story. Hawke is there at the beginning and should have role to play in that story as it unfolds. DA 2s ending is not what i would have expected for a stand alone adventure. It just lacks the closure of Origins.

[Tootles FTW]

I'd love for both protagonists to have a presence, if not make an actual cameo themselves. The way they left both the Warden & Hawke at the end of DA2 (they're "missing") it begs for a reveal of some sort, and I'm sure Flemeth might have something to do with it...

[BouncyFrag]

Not like he had any real effect on what happened in DA2 anyways, so, no.

[Doctoglethorpe]

They would have to canonize his (her?) appearence, class and affiliation.

I would be okay with this.  Especially since the safe assumption is that it would be mage manhawke, since thats the way the marketing went.  Which was what I did in my game too, so no harm done to my choices. 

But no they aren't going to do that. 

[Manic Sheep]

I don’t know that it would be a very good idea to bring Hawke back as an NPC who acts without the players input.
Although I am kind of hoping the disappearing thing is going to be worked into the story.

[Medhia Nox]

If Hawke were to be in the game - I would want a chance to kill him.

[AstraDrakkar]

Just....No. Unless he/she is out cleaning the stables.

[NoForgiveness]

dragon age is supposed to be a mix of different people each with their own stories.and Hawkes story is done a little qunari revenge for later and a mage/templar war for now. I wouldn't mind an appearance it might be interesting but definitely a couple mentions

[Steppenwolf]

Hawke wasn't instrumental in the start of the war so I don't see why his/her presence would be necessary.

[abaris]

Since they didn't design it as a series I couldn't care less.

I care more about story, love to detail, love for companions and tactical combat instead of anime jumps.

[saMoorai]

Personally, I would love for The Warden and Hawke to come back.

But only as the protagonists of future games.

[llandwynwyn]

Let the Warden/Hawke rest.

[Plato]

Don't want The Warden or Hawke to appear in anything other than codex, or dialogue with a different NPC..

[ShadyKat]

Good god, no!
I personally never want to see Hawke again.

[philippe willaume]

not no, but hell no