It's very simple: The contemporary notions of atheism and secularism floating around this thread and others like it pretend that history isn't about cause and effect.
As such, they can make demands like... "let's fight all religion!" in a world - Thedas - that isn't remotely prepared to challenge the moral authority of religion.
The secularism of the Enlightenment does not happen without the humanism of the Renaissance, the humanism of the Renaissance doesn't happen without the breaking down of Church authority during the Reformation, the Reformation doesn't happen without the various crisis of the Catholic Church in the previous centuries, the various crisis don't happen without widespread corruption and politicization of the Church, and there isn't any classical philosophy to "re-discover" during the Renaissance if the Greeks and Romans never wrote anything down.
The problem with these threads is they advocate jumping from the beginning to the end without anything like the above ever taking place, and this strains credulity in favor of arguing for what essentially amounts to wish fulfillment. "I do not like organized religion in real life, and would take great pleasure in tearing one down in a game."
I say all of this as a real contemporary atheist. But I do not pretend that modern secularism
isn't the result of centuries of slow, inconsistent progress. These are steps Thedas has not taken yet, and while I'd be interested in seeing them being taken, in their own way in their own time, I'm not about to throw my hat in with those who would say all those steps aren't as important as the end result. Because they're wrong.
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 21 septembre 2012 - 04:36 .