I whole heartedly agree as some critics of TW use the very same tactics. You'd swear that the sex/nude scenes were all there was to the game.Renmiri1 wrote...
QFT
Seriusly people. DA2 has a beheading, a "frankenwoman" built of women's parts by a serial killer, a church bombing...
Yet all we see here is "brodudes" whinning that there are romance cooties on their game. Get a grip!
When are we getting the "If DAI had no violence would you still play it" thread ?
Hello ? Is this thing on ? Why the sudden silence.
If DA3 had no romance...
#451
Posté 14 février 2013 - 09:55
#452
Posté 14 février 2013 - 10:01
Some people just don't want the game being influenced by some of the awful romance threads we see here in the BSN. One from yesterday had Mr. Gaider locking it himself and him commenting that the thread had made him loose faith in humanity. So removing all gameplay from the game to go full on dating sim? Sure, good idea.The Hierophant wrote...
I whole heartedly agree as some critics of TW use the very same tactics. You'd swear that the sex/nude scenes were all there was to the game.Renmiri1 wrote...
QFT
Seriusly people. DA2 has a beheading, a "frankenwoman" built of women's parts by a serial killer, a church bombing...
Yet all we see here is "brodudes" whinning that there are romance cooties on their game. Get a grip!
When are we getting the "If DAI had no violence would you still play it" thread ?
Hello ? Is this thing on ? Why the sudden silence.
#453
Posté 14 février 2013 - 10:04
That was because of rampant transphobia, mind.Some people just don't want the game being influenced by some of the awful romance threads we see here in the BSN. One from yesterday had Mr. Gaider locking it himself and him commenting that the thread had made him loose faith in humanity. So removing all gameplay from the game to go full on dating sim? Sure, good idea.
#454
Posté 14 février 2013 - 10:10
Soundsystem wrote...
I would probably still play. However, I find the romances are one of the more enjoyable aspects of the roleplaying for me.
However, if another game company was putting out a well written game with romances I would choose that game over the romance-less game easily.
Agree! I'm playing Skyrim right now, and I just keep thinking, wow, wouldn't this be a great game if my LI ... actually had a personality and stuff. Then I sigh and think fondly of BW.
#455
Posté 14 février 2013 - 10:23
Having a LI in game has always been a lovely little sprinkling of seasoning for me. I think it is good for the characters to have personal motivations, as well as the grander motivation of saving the world. In addition, being able to interact and influence other characters adds a degree of realism.
BouncyFrag wrote...
So removing all gameplay from the game to go full on dating sim? Sure, good idea.
If that was a parody game. I'd totally play it.
Modifié par once-ler, 14 février 2013 - 10:24 .
#456
Posté 14 février 2013 - 10:41
Naw i was just messing with Renmiri1 due to some posts in another thread.BouncyFrag wrote...
Some people just don't want the game being influenced by some of the awful romance threads we see here in the BSN. One from yesterday had Mr. Gaider locking it himself and him commenting that the thread had made him loose faith in humanity. So removing all gameplay from the game to go full on dating sim? Sure, good idea.
So far i like that the romances of DA have been kept minimal, and hope that for DA:I that the time that is invested in them doesn't detract from the cutscenes or dialogue involving the main questline's support characters, and antagonist.
Plus post a link for the bolded because iirc not even the "Quarian Booty Sweat" or "Darkspawn romance threads" received similar, but deserved comment from a dev.
#457
Posté 15 février 2013 - 12:03
Sutekh wrote...
It still would, a little, because she doesn't strike me as someone who would patiently wait for anyone to make the first move, but it's a reasonable compromise.Gotholhorakh wrote...
I think that rather than a toggle of all romance or sexuality, the simple idea of having to seek out a romance, and of having proper options for dialogue, while leaving the characters as they are (eg: Isabela is rude but doesn't try it on with you unless you give her some signal you're interested) would not present massive problems.
((Plus it would give me some ammunition against y'all vile romance haters, so I could yell at you "what are you talking about? All you have to do is not flirt with him / her" and be absolutely right about it))
Ha - you wouldn't hear me complaining to be honest, although I wouldn't say I was a romance hater as much as a romance meh'er except for once in a while.
Skyrim
Ha - Skyrim "romances" are probably about my speed to be honest, that's probably about as much romance as I need.
Modifié par Gotholhorakh, 15 février 2013 - 12:04 .
#458
Posté 15 février 2013 - 03:20
#459
Posté 16 février 2013 - 04:56
#460
Posté 16 février 2013 - 05:14
Modifié par BlueMoonSeraphim, 16 février 2013 - 05:15 .
#461
Posté 16 février 2013 - 05:20
Nefla wrote...
I don't see the problem with just rejecting a potential romance's advances. (though giving you a more diplomatic line than "I don't want you thinking of me that way! D:< " would be preferred) I mean I don't want to keep slaves or sacrifice elves (including my own father) to increase my stats or let a desire demon take over a little boy, etc...but I'm not offended that the game offers me those potential choices and I wouldn't look for a toggle that erases any evil choice from the game.
I think this is a really good point. We have in-game, in-character ways to respond to these decisions. As a person who has never taken one of those options (siding with slavers, deal with demon, etc) and probably wouldn't be interested in doing so ever, I still don't really care that they're included and wouldn't toggle them off. If I was FORCED into a deal with a demon (in an out of character situation), I would definitely be upset. But, then again, I'd also be upset if I was forced into a particular romance.
#462
Posté 17 février 2013 - 06:29
#463
Posté 17 février 2013 - 06:42
#464
Posté 17 février 2013 - 07:03
Modifié par The Teryn of Whatever, 17 février 2013 - 07:04 .
#465
Posté 17 février 2013 - 07:32
#466
Posté 17 février 2013 - 11:33
I'd still buy it and probably enjoy it, but there'd be a lot less replay value in it.
#467
Posté 17 février 2013 - 11:43
#468
Posté 17 février 2013 - 11:54
Modifié par Genshie, 17 février 2013 - 11:54 .
#469
Posté 17 février 2013 - 12:20
Genshie wrote...
Pretty sure this has already been brought up at least once but DAO:Awakening had zero romance. I mean sure you got to a few references and maybe a cameo from one or two characters bring said romance up but there was zero new romances and no romance scenes. Its been done before people. Nothing new.
Well that's technically different. I mean the character you're using possibly already has a LI. I think players would be less enthused if a brand new character had less options that the previous one even if they weren't promised LIs.....
I think most of the fanbase is a part of the I don't really care as long as the game is good, but honestly they'd likely say that about EVERYTHING. It's not fair to take it away from people who want it, but on the flip side it's not fair to force more of it at the expense of something others might like.
Tis an odd rope to walk.
#470
Posté 17 février 2013 - 01:46
SourceMykel54 wrote...
The vocal minority here on the BSN would be raging and showing how obsessed they truly are. The vast majority of users would play the game regardless and won´t care about romances.
#471
Posté 17 février 2013 - 02:14
#472
Posté 17 février 2013 - 02:41
However, FINALLY my PC can be asexual without any awkward flirting moments from potential LIs! =D
#473
Posté 17 février 2013 - 02:54
#474
Posté 17 février 2013 - 05:10
Modifié par drake heath, 17 février 2013 - 05:10 .
#475
Posté 17 février 2013 - 05:27
They serve as useful tools for character development however, so it'd be a shame to see them disappear. There exclusion would certainly not stop me buying the game though.
Modifié par Quote the Raven, 17 février 2013 - 05:29 .





Retour en haut





