arial wrote...
according to Psychology, when someone ignores something, 10% of the time its because they know they can not argue against it.
Modifié par Iconoclaste, 22 septembre 2012 - 03:30 .
arial wrote...
according to Psychology, when someone ignores something, 10% of the time its because they know they can not argue against it.Shinobu wrote...
jpraelster93 wrote...
Shinobu wrote...
MissMaster_2 wrote...
It would be awesome and it is really the only way they could fix this mess. But I don't think EA is willing to put in the extra time and money in to it.
It certainly depends on how well the next ME game does. If it is ME:Synthesis, I predict it will do less well than ME3 did. At that point EA will have to decide whether they pull the plug on the franchise, double down with ME:Synthesis part 2 or give fans a different game that many of us truly want.
Your a moron to think they would make a game for each ending that wouldnt be worth the time or money as it wouldnt make that time and money back well enough
Be polite or be ignored. Your choice.
If Synthesis is the only sequel ever offered, I doubt I will buy it. If ME: Destroy or ME:Successful Refuse is made, I would probably buy them. And I if I liked them I would go back and buy synthesis. Again, they would have to be different games,not just the same game with Geth replaced by friendly Reapers. Give Miranda a big role in Destroy and Tali a big role in Control and people will buy both.
What about the 90%?
Modifié par Shinobu, 22 septembre 2012 - 03:31 .
Shinobu wrote...
What I'm suggesting is unethical?Again, make an argument or go back to being ignored.
according to my Roommate, and hes a Phsychology studentIconoclaste wrote...
arial wrote...
according to Psychology, when someone ignores something, 10% of the time its because they know they can not argue against it.
What needs to be researched is the amount of people that always reside in this 10%... You're sure about the numbers, though?
we can only hopeIconoclaste wrote...
Hopefully, when (if) ME4 comes out some players will have grown up a bit...
you made no argument, you just said "In My Opinion this would be cool". That is not an argumentShinobu wrote...
arial wrote...
according to Psychology, when someone ignores something, 10% of the time its because they know they can not argue against it.Shinobu wrote...
jpraelster93 wrote...
Shinobu wrote...
MissMaster_2 wrote...
It would be awesome and it is really the only way they could fix this mess. But I don't think EA is willing to put in the extra time and money in to it.
It certainly depends on how well the next ME game does. If it is ME:Synthesis, I predict it will do less well than ME3 did. At that point EA will have to decide whether they pull the plug on the franchise, double down with ME:Synthesis part 2 or give fans a different game that many of us truly want.
Your a moron to think they would make a game for each ending that wouldnt be worth the time or money as it wouldnt make that time and money back well enough
Be polite or be ignored. Your choice.
If Synthesis is the only sequel ever offered, I doubt I will buy it. If ME: Destroy or ME:Successful Refuse is made, I would probably buy them. And I if I liked them I would go back and buy synthesis. Again, they would have to be different games,not just the same game with Geth replaced by friendly Reapers. Give Miranda a big role in Destroy and Tali a big role in Control and people will buy both.
Like you just ignored my argument? K thx bai!
What I meant was : is the 10% applying to everyone, "random dude ignores 10% of occurences", or is it possibly "On X people submitted to test, occurence is 10% of "ignoring", which leaves room to believe that some people always conveniently "ignore". I surely lean towards "some people tend to conveniently ignore more than others".arial wrote...
according to my Roommate, and hes a Psychology student
most likelyIconoclaste wrote...
What I meant was : is the 10% applying to everyone, "random dude ignores 10% of occurences", or is it possibly "On X people submitted to test, occurence is 10% of "ignoring", which leaves room to believe that some people always conveniently "ignore". I surely lean towards "some people tend to conveniently ignore more than others".arial wrote...
according to my Roommate, and hes a Psychology student
Jamie9 wrote...
This is a great idea in a world where money isn't the deciding factor. Since it is, this will never happen.
EA and Bioware would probably laugh their guts out behind closed doors upon reading such a suggestion...jpraelster93 wrote...
The fact is this is NEVER going to happen because ea wont make 4 games that not everyone will buy
you seem to think this is such a great Idea (which it isn't)Shinobu wrote...
Jamie9 wrote...
This is a great idea in a world where money isn't the deciding factor. Since it is, this will never happen.
So why do people believe that 4 games won't make money?
They would not be the same, plotwise
They would not come out in the same year
Thay would have different groups of squadmates
Believing that Synthesis is the most lucrative ending Bioware could offer a sequel to is pretty unrealistic, IMO. Since they can't swap to Destroy at this point, does that mean they should never offer Destroy (a bigger moneymaker than Synthesis)? I think it is unrealistic of Bioware to expect all fans to buy a sequel featuring Synthesis just because that's the only game offered. (If, in fact, this is what's happening.)
jpraelster93 wrote...
The fact is this is NEVER going to happen because ea wont make 4 games that not everyone will buy
arial wrote...
you seem to think this is such a great Idea (which it isn't)Shinobu wrote...
Jamie9 wrote...
This is a great idea in a world where money isn't the deciding factor. Since it is, this will never happen.
So why do people believe that 4 games won't make money?
They would not be the same, plotwise
They would not come out in the same year
Thay would have different groups of squadmates
Believing that Synthesis is the most lucrative ending Bioware could offer a sequel to is pretty unrealistic, IMO. Since they can't swap to Destroy at this point, does that mean they should never offer Destroy (a bigger moneymaker than Synthesis)? I think it is unrealistic of Bioware to expect all fans to buy a sequel featuring Synthesis just because that's the only game offered. (If, in fact, this is what's happening.)
So tell us, if this is such a great Idea, explain why its not common practice in the Video Game Industry?
Modifié par Shinobu, 22 septembre 2012 - 11:14 .
Debi-Tage wrote...
They are not going to make a game for each ending, but I don't think anyone is stupid for suggesting it either. If it is a sequel featuring Shep, they will have to retcon the endings with some "hint" DLC or an expansion. Which, wouldn't be that bad if they found the right way to do it. I happen to like the PT, but I don't even care if at this point they use the IT. Just get it done. If it is a prequel or some stupid MMO garbage, I don't care anyways because I wont be playing it. Have fun with your COD groupies BW.
P.S. they tend to be a bit more fickle than your current (remaining) fan base.
ShepnTali wrote...
What about Krogan, Quarians, Geth... they even exist anymore?
o Ventus wrote...
MegaSovereign wrote...
All non-refusing endings would likely be canon. They're probably going to find a way to combine all three concepts so that way the gameplay doesn't drastically change.
Just like Deus Ex: Invisible War.
I'm sure the merging of endings from the previous game isn't one of the reasons why DE:IW was complete garbage. At all.
say you just bought a New car. then you see another car for sale, with just a different color and design. Would you buy that second car as well? unlikelyShinobu wrote...
Debi-Tage wrote...
They are not going to make a game for each ending, but I don't think anyone is stupid for suggesting it either. If it is a sequel featuring Shep, they will have to retcon the endings with some "hint" DLC or an expansion. Which, wouldn't be that bad if they found the right way to do it. I happen to like the PT, but I don't even care if at this point they use the IT. Just get it done. If it is a prequel or some stupid MMO garbage, I don't care anyways because I wont be playing it. Have fun with your COD groupies BW.
P.S. they tend to be a bit more fickle than your current (remaining) fan base.
Going by the polls, Bioware should make Destroy or Successful Refuse. If they've already committed to Synthesis as I believe, they should stop with the Synthesis storyline after one game and switch to a different outcome that will make them more money.
Conniving_Eagle wrote...
This isn't Daggerfall.
Retour en haut