Ce sujet est fermé
EntropicAngel wrote...
Shadowfang12 wrote...
Hm.....I'm still not sure what you mean. Be specific man! Stop answering with your fancy riddles!
Kids these days.
EntropicAngel wrote...
Shadowfang12 wrote...
Hm.....I'm still not sure what you mean. Be specific man! Stop answering with your fancy riddles!
Kids these days.
Vandicus wrote...
EntropicAngel wrote...
Shadowfang12 wrote...
Hm.....I'm still not sure what you mean. Be specific man! Stop answering with your fancy riddles!
Kids these days.
So if the third letter at the beginning of the first post is switched with the thirteenth letter in the twenty ninth post...
I give up.
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Shadowfang12 wrote...
But...but I"m 20. I'm not a kid. Why you gotta be mean?
EntropicAngel wrote...
Shadowfang12 wrote...
But...but I"m 20. I'm not a kid. Why you gotta be mean?
I'm just that way, I guess.
Sorry, kid.
Modifié par Shadowfang12, 24 septembre 2012 - 03:00 .
And the few of them that might've even touched those games wouldn't even consider those characters as romancables because they don't fit the (rather warped) traditional Biowarian "player character x subordinate" relationship.The Hierophant wrote...
What bothered me too is that there is no mention of Letho, Iorveth, Dandelion, or Roche not being romanceable, which is typical of this fandom, so you know something gives.Dave of Canada wrote...
JobacNoor wrote...
It is quite sad that TW2 is being reduced to just "that game with the boobies".
Because they can't make legitimate arguments against the game's other features, so they'd rather dismiss them entirely. It's mostly how some of these people "argue", most of them haven't even touched the game or just parrot the other's opinions.
I'm sure they've already learned that particular lesson from DA2.Lithuasil wrote...
Nudity? Possibly.
Nudity the way witcher handled it? The only lesson to be taken from Witcher2 is how to **** up potential.
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Shadowfang12 wrote...
Gah, does your meanness know no end!? I was gonna offer you a cookie that DIDN"T have poison in it. But now I just don't know. So...you just lost a cookie that wouldn't cause you a violent death....was it worth it?
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Pseudocognition wrote...
*takes a drink*
No.
What she said.
*drinks*
Cthulhu42 wrote...
So you're judging the game after playing only around an hour of it?M25105 wrote...
Well I didn't find the Witcher 2 some sort of masterpiece as it often gets touted. It bored me pretty fast, and I haven't even completed the first part of the game yet, I'm at some sort of church right now after having defeated some nobles son or whatever and helped some king get his castle back.
M25105 wrote...
Cthulhu42 wrote...
So you're judging the game after playing only around an hour of it?M25105 wrote...
Well I didn't find the Witcher 2 some sort of masterpiece as it often gets touted. It bored me pretty fast, and I haven't even completed the first part of the game yet, I'm at some sort of church right now after having defeated some nobles son or whatever and helped some king get his castle back.
A good game captivates the player after the first five minutes.
Gibb_Shepard wrote...
M25105 wrote...
Cthulhu42 wrote...
So you're judging the game after playing only around an hour of it?M25105 wrote...
Well I didn't find the Witcher 2 some sort of masterpiece as it often gets touted. It bored me pretty fast, and I haven't even completed the first part of the game yet, I'm at some sort of church right now after having defeated some nobles son or whatever and helped some king get his castle back.
A good game captivates the player after the first five minutes.
Some of the best games with the best narratives started out slowly.
That said, i can't say TW2 falls under that category. If you don't like the political intrigue and the concepts that have so far been established, you shouldn't play the game any further.
Which mentions other features of the game how?Dave of Canada wrote...
Maverick827 wrote...
You must have me mistaken for someone else.Dave of Canada wrote...
Maverick827 wrote...
The only relevent features about the game in a thread about romance is, shockingly, the romance related features.
Yet, people bring up gameplay and story.
*gasp* You did so yourself earlier, such a curious thing!
Oh hey.
M25105 wrote...
Gibb_Shepard wrote...
M25105 wrote...
Cthulhu42 wrote...
So you're judging the game after playing only around an hour of it?M25105 wrote...
Well I didn't find the Witcher 2 some sort of masterpiece as it often gets touted. It bored me pretty fast, and I haven't even completed the first part of the game yet, I'm at some sort of church right now after having defeated some nobles son or whatever and helped some king get his castle back.
A good game captivates the player after the first five minutes.
Some of the best games with the best narratives started out slowly.
That said, i can't say TW2 falls under that category. If you don't like the political intrigue and the concepts that have so far been established, you shouldn't play the game any further.
If I have to wait 1 hour or hell even 2 hours for a game to actually get any good, then it's not a good game.
Maverick827 wrote...
Which mentions other features of the game how?Dave of Canada wrote...
Maverick827 wrote...
You must have me mistaken for someone else.Dave of Canada wrote...
Maverick827 wrote...
The only relevent features about the game in a thread about romance is, shockingly, the romance related features.
Yet, people bring up gameplay and story.
*gasp* You did so yourself earlier, such a curious thing!
Oh hey.
Gibb_Shepard wrote...
M25105 wrote...
Gibb_Shepard wrote...
M25105 wrote...
Cthulhu42 wrote...
So you're judging the game after playing only around an hour of it?M25105 wrote...
Well I didn't find the Witcher 2 some sort of masterpiece as it often gets touted. It bored me pretty fast, and I haven't even completed the first part of the game yet, I'm at some sort of church right now after having defeated some nobles son or whatever and helped some king get his castle back.
A good game captivates the player after the first five minutes.
Some of the best games with the best narratives started out slowly.
That said, i can't say TW2 falls under that category. If you don't like the political intrigue and the concepts that have so far been established, you shouldn't play the game any further.
If I have to wait 1 hour or hell even 2 hours for a game to actually get any good, then it's not a good game.
No, it's a game that doesn't conform to a structure so as to sate your short attention span. Two very, very different things.
I call game that divulges lore and dialogue to open me up to the world as the best opening there can be. Being thrown straight into killing randoms is not what i call a good intro.
MarchWaltz wrote...
No, if you want porn, go watch porn. No need in my game.
Maverick827 wrote...
Which mentions other features of the game how?
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 24 septembre 2012 - 06:28 .
Ha-ha...Nope.itst always been ok to show nudity on monsters as because you are not sleeping with them.
Nrieh wrote...
Ha-ha...Nope.itst always been ok to show nudity on monsters as because you are not sleeping with them.
Monsters are NOT humans. You can make any kind of monster - and no one can blame you for showing FEMALE HUMAN breast, same trick works for Liara all the way - she's NOT a Female Human, and no laws describe rules of showing "blue female-like alien which even monogendered according to the lore". That's why it's "ok" to show "naked" Lady of the Forest, Desire Demon and Broodmother (same as it's "politcorrect" to show...let's say cow's breast), but you can't see what Hawke has under her home suit.
Retour en haut
