479 réponses à ce sujet

[Dreadstruck]

Xewaka wrote...

Avalla'ch wrote...
True that. Apart from the legitimate criticism (main character being subjective, the theme, controls etc.) from some people, most people here just see it as "the game where pixels have sex", and that's about it. Political intrigue? Branching storyline? Choices and consequences? Wut is that?

From your description, Alpha Protocol.

Hey now, I loved Alpha Protocol.

[Xewaka]

Avalla'ch wrote...

Xewaka wrote...

Avalla'ch wrote...
True that. Apart from the legitimate criticism (main character being subjective, the theme, controls etc.) from some people, most people here just see it as "the game where pixels have sex", and that's about it. Political intrigue? Branching storyline? Choices and consequences? Wut is that?

From your description, Alpha Protocol.

Hey now, I loved Alpha Protocol.

Alpha protocol had Political intrigue, branching storyline, and choices and consequences. Hence the answer.
I feel lame for having to explain the joke.

[Zkyire]

Upsettingshorts wrote...

It's not "more detailed" it's the definition of "detailed" people are objecting to, especially if the Witcher 2 is the reference point for said request.

The sex scene with Triss goes on for about 30 seconds.

You don't actually see any penetration.

The camera is constantly moving.

If anyone thinks that is 'graphic' then they don't know what graphic means.

[Dreadstruck]

Xewaka wrote...
Alpha protocol had Political intrigue, branching storyline, and choices and consequences. Hence the answer.
I feel lame for having to explain the joke.

Oh, i got the joke. I just felt I had to proclaim my opinion about a game everyone seems to be hating. See my past thread about it.

[John Epler]

This thread has gone off the rails, burst into flames and slammed, full-tilt, into a puppy hospital.

I think we're long past any useful or productive discussion coming from it.