38 réponses à ce sujet

[jmadsen]

 
http://tvtropes.org/...eIIIInquisition

Is this info legit?

[DarkKnightHolmes]

If it is, I'm going on a rant and probably won't play DA3 till the price go down.

[BrowncoatN7]

I hope not, I'd hate to have to side with the Chantry. I haven't seen that info anywhere else, so I doubt it's legit.

[Angelo2027]

I don't think this is legit. If I have to side with the templars I think I will lose my interest in the game.

[Wulfram]

The first bits true, the second bit is very likely

The third bit is based on some map thingy Mike Laidlaw showed once. So it likely at least reflects the thinking at some point, but shouldn't be taken as gospel.

As for the 4th bit, going by the leaked survey and of course the name of the game, it does seem likely that the player will be the head of a new Inquisition. But whether that Inquisition will necessarily be anti-mage, like the previous one, is not confirmed and seems doubtful to me - Bioware know that would alienate a lot of it's playerbase.

Modifié par Wulfram, 24 septembre 2012 - 12:12 .

[ManOfSteel]

Wulfram wrote...

The first bits true, the second bit is very likely

The third bit is based on some map thingy Mike Laidlaw showed once. So it likely at least reflects the thinking at some point, but shouldn't be taken as gospel.

As for the 4th bit, going by the leaked survey and of course the name of the game, it does seem likely that the player will be the head of a new Inquisition. But whether that Inquisition will necessarily be anti-mage, like the previous one is not confirmed, and seems doubtful to me - Bioware know that would alienate a lot of it's playerbase.

This right here.

[Plaintiff]

It's TV Tropes, so no.

[Augustei]

I hope it is just to annoy you anti-chantry free mage types and to see you cry and complain on the forums =P

Modifié par XxDeonxX, 24 septembre 2012 - 11:52 .

[Sable Rhapsody]

XxDeonxX wrote...

I hope it is just to annoy you anti-chantry free mage types and to see you cry and complain on the forums =P

Troll tropers are troll 

I very much doubt it's accurate.  We always got to pick sides in the mage/templar conflict before, so unless DA3 goes the way of ME3, it should be the same in Inquisition.

[berelinde]

TV Tropes is a wiki editable by anyone and his dog. They do not insist that anything be verified or confirmed in any way. That doesn't make the information there false, but it doesn't make it true, either. Probably going to have to wait for official word.

[Altered Idol]

So we are to believe that DA3 will provide us the option of being a mage so we can reform an ancient organisation whose purpose was to persecute mages??? I highly doubt this will be the case.

In my opinion, the Inquisition will not be about hunting down mages but will be tasked with finding answers to what has plunged Thedas into chaos. And I imagine the answers are far more complex than we would believe.

[Lotion Soronarr]

Sable Rhapsody wrote...

XxDeonxX wrote...

I hope it is just to annoy you anti-chantry free mage types and to see you cry and complain on the forums =P

Troll tropers are troll 

I very much doubt it's accurate.  We always got to pick sides in the mage/templar conflict before, so unless DA3 goes the way of ME3, it should be the same in Inquisition.

It wouldn't surprise me.
Remeber what happened to all those that supported Cerberus?

[Vandicus]

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Sable Rhapsody wrote...

XxDeonxX wrote...

I hope it is just to annoy you anti-chantry free mage types and to see you cry and complain on the forums =P

Troll tropers are troll 

I very much doubt it's accurate.  We always got to pick sides in the mage/templar conflict before, so unless DA3 goes the way of ME3, it should be the same in Inquisition.

It wouldn't surprise me.
Remeber what happened to all those that supported Cerberus?

But the player can play a mage, and specialize in blood magic at that. It would seem odd to have an anti-mage blood mage.

[Augustei]

Vandicus wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Sable Rhapsody wrote...

XxDeonxX wrote...

I hope it is just to annoy you anti-chantry free mage types and to see you cry and complain on the forums =P

Troll tropers are troll 

I very much doubt it's accurate.  We always got to pick sides in the mage/templar conflict before, so unless DA3 goes the way of ME3, it should be the same in Inquisition.

It wouldn't surprise me.
Remeber what happened to all those that supported Cerberus?

But the player can play a mage, and specialize in blood magic at that. It would seem odd to have an anti-mage blood mage.

more likely they will make The Templars the Cerberus of the Dragon Age Series

[Montana]

Altered Idol wrote...

So we are to believe that DA3 will provide us the option of being a mage so we can reform an ancient organisation whose purpose was to persecute mages??? I highly doubt this will be the case.

In my opinion, the Inquisition will not be about hunting down mages but will be tasked with finding answers to what has plunged Thedas into chaos. And I imagine the answers are far more complex than we would believe.

If the Inquisition is indeed the organization that the pc will belong to, it will probably be as you say.
An independent organization tasked with finding out what happened and then fixing it.

[Melca36]

jmadsen wrote...

 
http://tvtropes.org/...eIIIInquisition

Is this info legit?

Its not true. They want the game to SELL and catering to one fandom would NOT help.  

[thats1evildude]

Keep in mind that TV Tropes is a wiki that anyone can edit. The wording does not come from Bioware.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 24 septembre 2012 - 06:06 .

[Vilegrim]

Hope not, destroying the chantry would be the only heroic thing to do, not join them.

[Augustei]

Vilegrim wrote...

Hope not, destroying the chantry would be the only heroic thing to do, not join them.

Nothing more heroic than destroying the one organization capable of calling a unification of nations against the Qunari should they once again invade.... Wait thats not heroic thats ridiculous

Modifié par XxDeonxX, 25 septembre 2012 - 04:26 .

[Auintus]

Vilegrim wrote...

Hope not, destroying the chantry would be the only heroic thing to do, not join them.

Cool, someone's on my side.

[The Night Haunter]

Angelo2027 wrote...

I don't think this is legit. If I have to side with the templars I think I will lose my interest in the game.

You do realize that this scenario means the Inquisition is being made to REPLACE the Templars (who went rogue), and as such the Inquisition would be at best nominal allies with the Templars, and far more likely to be rivals and enter into open conflict.

Also, if you are building the Mage Controlling Organization to replace Templars that doesnt mean you are anti-mage, it means you can decide how the new Inquisition treats mages. i.e. you can be the kinder version of Templars that you all wanted, or you can be the oppressive mage hunters that the other side wants.

Jumping to conclusions is silly when the only confirmed info we got is that the games name is Inquisition.

Sure you can look into DA lore and see the Inquisition was the original name of the Templars, but thats like assuming that because Robert E Lee was a West Point Graduate that all West Pointers are anti-centralized state power. So to repeat, dont jump to conclusions, and there are about 500 diff ways to read into any piece of speculation/rumor.

[silentassassin264]

I hated how DA2 was horribly biased to the templars. Actually, hate isn't really strong enough of a word. I doubt there really is a word in the English language to adequately express the negativity of my feelings towards that. If they make another heavily anti-mage game, you best believe I will not touch it.

[The Night Haunter]

silentassassin264 wrote...

I hated how DA2 was horribly biased to the templars. Actually, hate isn't really strong enough of a word. I doubt there really is a word in the English language to adequately express the negativity of my feelings towards that. If they make another heavily anti-mage game, you best believe I will not touch it.

Really? You think Meredith going bat crap crazy in such an obvious way that it almost forces you to side with mages is anti-mage? Sure a bunch of blood mages attack you, but that happens in Origins too.
One of Anders quests sees you walking in on a Templar threatening to rape a mage, do you think that biases you towards Templars?
Feynriel has the best ending if you set him free from the Templars, he saves a womans life and uses his powers for good. That seems to be biased towards mages. A templar biased ending would have Feynriel go crazy and kill a crowd of innocents.
Marethari is always controlled and helpful, she isnt some wild apostate. She even knowingly sacrifces herself, and does so in a manner that insures the demon is destroyed.

There are many, many instances that you can consider pro-mage, there are also some that are anti-mage. That is how it should be. Unless you think it should all be pro-mage, which is silly.

[Last Vizard]

XxDeonxX wrote...

Vilegrim wrote...

Hope not, destroying the chantry would be the only heroic thing to do, not join them.

Nothing more heroic than destroying the one organization capable of calling a unification of nations against the Qunari should they once again invade.... Wait thats not heroic thats ridiculous

The chantry isn't needed for that... most leaders will see the dangers and unite at some point, religion is a tool to control weak minds.

[Lotion Soronarr]

Atheism is a fabrication fo weak minds.