103 réponses à ce sujet

[darthnick427]

Logan Cloud wrote...

Only if it's "To The Death."
I want to be entertained by blood sport when I toy with people's emotions.

lulz

[AntiChri5]

Is today your first day on the BSN?

Well, my join date is right under my avatar.

But i do tend to spend long stretches away from the site for the sake of my sanity.

[Palipride47]

Parmida wrote...

So, I really love catfights that make two or three LIs fighting over the protagonist (like the Ashley&Liara or Kaidan&Liara) I really missed this in DA2, you could simply dump them for another LI and they're totally okay with it and they don't confront you or your LI.
I even loved those jealousy confrontations in DA:O, I really had a lot of fun with this.
So, what do you think?

Obviously, you must have romanced Anders every time, because he has PLENTY of catty things to say if you shack up wth Fenris or Merrill. Dude's been obsessed with you for ten years.....

And if you decide you aren't going to wait for Fenris after his love scene and go for Anders....I swear, they were like 14 year old girls. 

Read the wikia : http://dragonage.wik...ders_and_Fenris

Scroll down past the Act 3 stuff.....

I LOVE the catty stuff to hear the dialogue and snicker to myself. Rather have it eminating from 3D renderings than real people, combined with the hope Anders and Fenris will finally just duke it out and Hawke can have some peace and quiet. 

Modifié par Palipride47, 25 septembre 2012 - 02:50 .

[Harle Cerulean]

I'd like it if LIs realized when the player character was being an ass and playing them both along. They could team up and put the PC in his/her place, and end both romances. Consequences for actions are good, and I'd like to see some for leading two LIs on.

[Palipride47]

Cthulhu42 wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...

Do people really have such underdeveloped egos that they want to watch pixel people fight over their self insert?

They do. Personally I never saw the appeal myself.

Some do have horrible self esteem.

I (and some others, I'm sure) just think the ambient dialogue when you do stuff like that tends to be hilarious. I pretty much bought Legacy for catty dialogue. 

[Quicksilver26]

[quote]AntiChri5 wrote...

Do people really have such underdeveloped egos that they want to watch pixel people fight over their self insert?[/quote]
Umm yes. Your point being? Like probably most in here, I too validate and project all my hidden desires, angst, and repressed emotions through these videogame characters. There isn’t even one decision or action in the game that doesn’t rise from some abyss of my psyche, and there simply isn’t and cannot be any other motivation or pleasure in playing RPGs. So now when we have stated the obvious, can we move on with the catfights please. [/quote]


That right there is why auto-dialogue paraphrasing is dwon right EVIL.<_<

Modifié par Quicksilver26, 25 septembre 2012 - 04:47 .

[The Night Haunter]

I wasn't betraying you with Morrigan in the tent last night, Leliana. We were.. uh... going over strategies.... in depth strategies....

[Palipride47]

Quicksilver26 wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...

Do people really have such underdeveloped egos that they want to watch pixel people fight over their self insert?

Umm yes. Your point being? Like probably most in here, I too validate and project all my hidden desires, angst, and repressed emotions through these videogame characters. There isn’t even one decision or action in the game that doesn’t rise from some abyss of my psyche, and there simply isn’t and cannot be any other motivation or pleasure in playing RPGs. So now when we have stated the obvious, can we move on with the catfights please.

That too. I mean, why would anyone have a particular affinity for any character in any DA game when they aren't "real" if a few people don't play like that (We have an 8 page Cullen forum somewhere, so a few people DO play that way *raises hand shyly*)

Modifié par Palipride47, 25 septembre 2012 - 04:55 .

[Shadow Fox]

drake heath wrote...

If it makes sense, I guess. But I'd like to see it where you cheat, and both of them dump you.

No catfights, no choice, just you alone.

Yeah this my characters don't cheat because they aren't douchebags.

Modifié par Arcane Warrior Mage Hawke, 25 septembre 2012 - 06:00 .

[Blackrising]

Arcane Warrior Mage Hawke wrote...

drake heath wrote...

If it makes sense, I guess. But I'd like to see it where you cheat, and both of them dump you.

No catfights, no choice, just you alone.

Yeah this my characters don't cheat because they aren't douchebags.

That should be included as well. If the PC goes to far (as in, moves beyond light flirting), the two LIs should dump him/her. Or there could be one LI that won't even accept light flirting and WILL end you if you continue to do so after the first warning. Also an LI that doesn't care if you sleep with someone else, but gets angry if s/he suspects an emotional involvment (like Isabela).

[AlienWolf728]

EpicBoot2daFace wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...

Do people really have such underdeveloped egos that they want to watch pixel people fight over their self insert?

It makes them feel important.

Hm, I wonder if it's because we're the main character? <_<

[VTSC]

Or we could, you know, have the chance of a threesome. NWN is the only game I remember with such an option...

[The Night Haunter]

defdaef wrote...

Or we could, you know, have the chance of a threesome. NWN is the only game I remember with such an option...

DAO had several different 3 somes. Isabela the Warden and his LI (except Morrigan).

Or, even better than a 3some.... a FOURSOME!!!!! Isabela, Warden, Zevran and Leliana.

[AntiChri5]

Umm yes. Your point being? Like probably most in here, I too validate and project all my hidden desires, angst, and repressed emotions through these videogame characters. There isn’t even one decision or action in the game that doesn’t rise from some abyss of my psyche, and there simply isn’t and cannot be any other motivation or pleasure in playing RPGs. So now when we have stated the obvious, can we move on with the catfights please.

It is never wise to definitively declare why people enjoy something, especially RPG's.

I, for one, enjoy interacting with characters. I don't want to see those characters turn into pathetic children because some players have an underdeveloped ego and can't deal with their issues properly. I want strong, independant characters who react to being lead on and cheated on by telling the cheater to **** off. I want romances to be based on things like mutual affection and respect between the character being roleplayed and the character in the game, not a warped power fantasy of someone who doesn't understand relationships.

[syllogi]

"Catfights" over a supposed claim on another person is the sort of thing I expect to see on school buses or MTV reality shows. I'm not real interested in having that happen in a game.

Talking with the involved parties about the fact that my character is flirting or having a relationship with more than one character is fine. Having them duel to the death over it is kind of ridiculous.

[RedWulfi]

I would love to have companions get together unless the PC says otherwise. Like trying to get Joker and EDI together. Have some banter on that. Maybe two companions could start flirting ad the PC butts in "Not listening! Lalalalala!"

[Parmida]

AntiChri5 wrote...

Umm yes. Your point being? Like probably most in here, I too validate and project all my hidden desires, angst, and repressed emotions through these videogame characters. There isn’t even one decision or action in the game that doesn’t rise from some abyss of my psyche, and there simply isn’t and cannot be any other motivation or pleasure in playing RPGs. So now when we have stated the obvious, can we move on with the catfights please.

It is never wise to definitively declare why people enjoy something, especially RPG's.

I, for one, enjoy interacting with characters. I don't want to see those characters turn into pathetic children because some players have an underdeveloped ego and can't deal with their issues properly. I want strong, independant characters who react to being lead on and cheated on by telling the cheater to **** off. I want romances to be based on things like mutual affection and respect between the character being roleplayed and the character in the game, not a warped power fantasy of someone who doesn't understand relationships.

Sh*t man! you're taking games too seriously. I can't believe I have to take that for suggesting something.
And to each his own.

[Punahedan]

syllogi wrote...

"Catfights" over a supposed claim on another person is the sort of thing I expect to see on school buses or MTV reality shows. I'm not real interested in having that happen in a game.

Talking with the involved parties about the fact that my character is flirting or having a relationship with more than one character is fine. Having them duel to the death over it is kind of ridiculous.

This.

A love triangle isn't necessary to make a relationship dramatic.

I do, however, enjoy seeing party members interact, whether it's arguing or developing their own romances.

[Onyx Jaguar]

The Steaks are too high! As John Smoltz once uttered

[VTSC]

ghostmessiah202 wrote...

defdaef wrote...

Or we could, you know, have the chance of a threesome. NWN is the only game I remember with such an option...

DAO had several different 3 somes. Isabela the Warden and his LI (except Morrigan).

Or, even better than a 3some.... a FOURSOME!!!!! Isabela, Warden, Zevran and Leliana.

I meant a relationship not a sex encounter. Though NWN isn't the best example as there's just a "I'll share this man with you until we find a better decision". I was thinking more along the lines of a real, stable relationship between 3 people...

[mopotter]

No Man or Woman video character or real, is worth fighting over. My character is not going to be a trophy that the winner gets to try and drag off to his/her lair. Ugh. If this were to be included, it would have to be set up so only someone who wanted to watch it got pulled into it. Hate this stuff. Stupid, childish, dumb, stereotype.

Agree with Tootles FTW, the only thing I would not mind is something like the Fenris/Anders comment.

[mopotter]

LPPrince wrote...

franciscoamell wrote...

I liked that in DAO Morrigan, Zevran, Leliana and Alistair confronted you when you developped romantic relationships with two people, it made way more sense than in ME3 and DA2 where they just knew and backed off without saying anything.

Yeah, I liked that characters brought up the fact that you pursued more than one love interest.

Hell, I liked it when characters chimed in about your CHOICE in love interest.

For example, Wynne's Concerns on Morrigan Romance, and Wynne's Change of Heart On The Subject

Very well done segments.

This would be great.  I also liked ME1 where Ash/Kaidan and Liara confronted Shepard, and I liked the fact that in JE you could successfully romance both Dawn Star and Silk Fox.