BS all thingsLadyNemsis21 wrote...
dream3873 wrote...
I call BS.
Next DLCs coming - schedule! Leak
#126
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:02
#127
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:04
Y U no make Brilliant Surge, Bioware?
#128
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:06
SparkeeLecaro wrote...
Kyerea wrote...
Yoshiyuki Ly wrote...
Sums up how I feel perfectly.
I may as well quote this and be on my way.
This.
#129
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:07
#130
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:16
And the one article made it sound like there were several mp dlcs in the works.
But I guess they are going off interest in mp, so any future ones after retaliation could be cancelled if there is no demand.
#131
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:23
#132
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:33
ash2880 wrote...
Utterly amazing how many people posted "NO OMEGA?! CLEARLY FAKE!" when it says right at the top that Omega isn't listed since it's already confirmed.
I don't even think that's the biggest indication of it being fake (despite the fact that in the pastebin this was copied from, the Omega line isn't included. Omega isn't mentioned whatsoever). The fact that it has so many DLCs listed as free, some of which pertain to the ending which Bioware has stated it's not touching anymore, is more troubling. It's fan service to get people excited for nothing. Add that with the fact that the last DLC listed, Rebirth, requires you to purchase AT LEAST 2400MS/Bioware points worth of DLC in order to get it? I don't see Bioware doing that.
#133
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:37
Troll. Sorry OP this oat you found is definitely a troll.
Modifié par StrawHatMoose, 25 septembre 2012 - 03:40 .
#134
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:38
ash2880 wrote...
Utterly amazing how many people posted "NO OMEGA?! CLEARLY FAKE!" when it says right at the top that Omega isn't listed since it's already confirmed.
#135
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:43
I'm not commeting on the legitimacy of it, just the staggering amount of people who weren't reading.DeathIsHere wrote...
ash2880 wrote...
Utterly amazing how many people posted "NO OMEGA?! CLEARLY FAKE!" when it says right at the top that Omega isn't listed since it's already confirmed.
I don't even think that's the biggest indication of it being fake (despite the fact that in the pastebin this was copied from, the Omega line isn't included. Omega isn't mentioned whatsoever). The fact that it has so many DLCs listed as free, some of which pertain to the ending which Bioware has stated it's not touching anymore, is more troubling. It's fan service to get people excited for nothing. Add that with the fact that the last DLC listed, Rebirth, requires you to purchase AT LEAST 2400MS/Bioware points worth of DLC in order to get it? I don't see Bioware doing that.
And "NO OMEGA?! FAKE!" just seems like a misnomer on its own. Who would go to this trouble of faking a list like this and then completely forget a DLC that's already been announced? The point seems to be leaking news of DLC that nobody's heard about. Real or fake, there's no reason to include Omega, which everyone knows is happening.
#136
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:48
#137
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:49
.. and too much fan dream, such as retake earth stuffs and things like that...
Modifié par LeandroBraz, 25 septembre 2012 - 03:50 .
#138
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:49
isn't even allowed by xbox policies? (My interpretation of the word "required" is that all the DLCs are required...)Astaiir wrote...
Mass Effect 3 Rebirth DLC:free DLC{required all DLC}
edit: typos...
Modifié par Blackphoenix85, 25 septembre 2012 - 03:50 .
#139
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:51
But some of these information can be cross-referenced with some other threads (like some Prophecies of OTS).
Exemple :
This Thread : http://social.biowar.../index/14228724
Mention a new Pistol (Exectionner) and a new Shotgun (Venom).
Looks like an Assassin's Weapon Pack to me...
Mass Effect 3 Assassin DLC pack:{DLC name may change}:
Weapon DLC pack:
DLC release date:November 2012
And the Retaliation DLC is rumored for long (i can't find the post of the "Annonce")(and too lazy to search right now).
November is an interesting date, as it will be in a crutial period for Multiplayer (don't forget the annual Call of Duty is comming, with it's annual 10Million unit sold).
A big MP content could slow the exode a little.
The rest of the schedule seems coherent too.
A SP DLC in the Chrismas period, to give some visibility for the game at this crutial time (and from the name looks like big stuff, good to interest players).
Finishing in Febuary, for a year of DLC, regularly spaced.
If this is a fake, someone took a good time to think about it...
Edit : Typos&formatting
Modifié par Neumeusis, 25 septembre 2012 - 04:13 .
#140
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 04:58
Neumeusis wrote...
November is an interesting date, as it will be in a crutial period for Multiplayer (don't forget the annual Call of Duty is comming, with it's annual 10Million unit sold).
A big MP content could slow the exode a little.
The rest of the schedule seems coherent too.
A SP DLC in the Chrismas period, to give some visibility for the game at this crutial time (and from the name looks like big stuff, good to interest players).
Finishing in Febuary, for a year of DLC, regularly spaced.
If this is a fake, someone took a good time to think about it...
Edit : Typos&formatting
I'm with you crossing fingers even though it sounds fake. But the whole annual COD release taking people from the MP still angers me. Call of duty is like porn once you've seen one you've seen em all. At least FIFA - not fan of - tries to do something different with every release, actually trying, with COD it more of the same.
#141
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:11
#142
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:12
#143
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:13
#144
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:14
#145
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:30
#146
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:36
OblivionDawn wrote...
This has been confirmed fake by Chris Priestly in the Story/Campaign Discussion board.
Rule Number One of Public Relation ( = for all industry public relation) : Never-EVER-acknowledge an information leak.
(because, well, even if it is a true leak, what firm will say : yes, our employe/parteners are so trustable that all our intern information is displayed in the view of all on the internet ! Yeha ! Yes, we keep secrets well !)
Rule Number One of Information Leak : Only trust the official statment if it is positive.
(who did not encounter the case :
Leak : xxx firm will close and fire yyy employees next month
Official person, 2 days later : No, we will NEVER do that.
2 weeks later : xxx firm is closing and fireing yyy emplyees)
(and if i remember well, the Script leaks were said as fake too, at there time...)
#147
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:38
#148
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:42
#149
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:44
Neumeusis wrote...
OblivionDawn wrote...
This has been confirmed fake by Chris Priestly in the Story/Campaign Discussion board.
Rule Number One of Public Relation ( = for all industry public relation) : Never-EVER-acknowledge an information leak.
(because, well, even if it is a true leak, what firm will say : yes, our employe/parteners are so trustable that all our intern information is displayed in the view of all on the internet ! Yeha ! Yes, we keep secrets well !)
Rule Number One of Information Leak : Only trust the official statment if it is positive.
(who did not encounter the case :
Leak : xxx firm will close and fire yyy employees next month
Official person, 2 days later : No, we will NEVER do that.
2 weeks later : xxx firm is closing and fireing yyy emplyees)
(and if i remember well, the Script leaks were said as fake too, at there time...)
Yeah. Okay.
#150
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:46





Retour en haut








