Is this real?
#101
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 04:00
#102
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 04:30
not a attack or anything. but i have seen chris deny past dlc's and then have them announced a week later so i am iffy on that
Modifié par ghost9191, 05 octobre 2012 - 04:32 .
#103
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 07:39
Also the "Rebirth" sounds more like Puzzle theory than Project X. Since it would arguably require all previous DLCs to be bought and installed. Which is something Bioware would never do. That would be extortion, because you couldn't play that without spending like $50 on every other DLC.
Light also makes no sense. The whole "explore new systems" thing happens every DLC
War Assets Cinematics would be dreadful. Absurdly long cutscenes cluttering between gameplay.
Revamping Priority: Earth I would actually go for. If only to be able to fight all enemy factions at once, rather than just the Reaper troops.
Citadel DLC also makes little sense. It's more likely that the Citadel maps in Leviathan were for starting off future DLC, like you do Leviathan(the window had room for like three more locations. Omega plus two more fill that up.)
Plus like they said, they'd have to do 90 hour weeks to get everything made and out according to that timetable. That or hire a lot of extra manpower, which creates more room for error
#104
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:33
Perhaps instead of biting the hands that feed you, just accept what has been told to you by the people that would know, and keep the conspiracy theory stuff to the conspiracy theory sites? its sort of not fair to see Chris et al having to deal with this sort of stuff or 'im not happy about the ending, change it plox' stuff on almost every thread. Please remember that without these people, you wouldn't have had this awesome trilogy to play in the first place,
#105
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:48
thats the point. retaliation is old news. it might be that someone just wants improve trafic for clevernob. or make project x as popular as the it theory.ghost9191 wrote...
well they were right about at least one dlc. time will tell for rest. not saying it is , but alot of them are a long the lines that i want so would be nice.
not a attack or anything. but i have seen chris deny past dlc's and then have them announced a week later so i am iffy on that
#106
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 10:13
No source for the rumors, yeah, the web always offers the absolute truth...
A DLC that needs other DLCs..sure (enter the rage).
Some ''free'' wishful thinking DLCs that land dead spot on the demands of the comunity...why? I can understand the EC being free but the rest? Working people need to be payed, nobody can feed a family with the gratitude of the community, won't even try to mention EA in this.
A free weapon pack DLC is one thing but a few hours of additional content, VO, animations, etc to be made free is a something else entirely.
Fake would be my answer, wouldn't hold my breath.
Modifié par Thorwind, 05 octobre 2012 - 10:15 .
#107
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 10:21
It may be fake, but I'm not beliving it is just because Chris the Liar said so.
#108
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 11:59
^ThisZenor wrote...
The Retaliation DLC was leaked 22 days ago, unlike on clevernoob's site.
Onetrueshot posted this: http://www.reddit.co..._3_retaliation/
Notice how it is spot on.
Clevernoob's site has the "timeline" at least 11 days after. I wouldn't call this true until something else comes up.
Thank you. The only real DLC on that leak list was the retaliation DLC. The others are wishful thinking at best.
#109
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 02:41
#110
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 02:44
Han Shot First wrote...
Tali-vas-normandy wrote...
whats project X?
A combination of outright lies and wishful thinking by IT fans.
#111
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 04:57
Chris Priestly wrote...
Anytime I lock a rumor, it comes back again by someone seeing teh rumor for the first time OR people assume I am trying to "hide the truth" by burying it. So it stays open for now.
As I said on Twitter, this isn't even a good fake as the development time between DLCs is far too short.
Not if it was pulled from the original release content.
#112
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 05:03
Besides that: it does not contain a Virmire DLC - which is a strong hint this roadmap could be realistic. -.-
You know, BW staff simply don't like the VS.
#113
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:52
Plastickitten357 wrote...
I actually feel really sorry for Chris and the mods on these forums.. they tell you no, and you don't believe them, i bet if they said yes, you wouldn't believe them either! It doesnt even matter anyway, ppl will be able to play the DLC when it gets released regardless of any leaked info.
Maybe if Chris said the Indoctrination Theory is true, people would stop believing it. #Thatwouldbesoawesome
#114
Posté 06 octobre 2012 - 01:34
artificial-ignorance wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
And the truth is, I don't care if you believe me.
Obviously there is more DLC coming. And obviously, the days posted in this falsehood are coming. When the days pass and the DLC is not there, then you'll start believing. I only say it is false now so you don't get too worked up that it is real.
Some leaks are real. They happen no matter how much I wish they didn't. This one is a pretty bad fake as it doesn't give a source where it came from and doesn't make sense time wise. Still, keep your fingers crossed, just don't blame me when arthritis sets in.
I would hate to have your job, sifting through these forums... responding to moronic conspiracy theories and the fools who believe them.
+1
and dealing with the rude members here who talk to you with no respect at all.
#115
Posté 06 octobre 2012 - 04:06
The Grey Nayr wrote...
Plastickitten357 wrote...
I actually feel really sorry for Chris and the mods on these forums.. they tell you no, and you don't believe them, i bet if they said yes, you wouldn't believe them either! It doesnt even matter anyway, ppl will be able to play the DLC when it gets released regardless of any leaked info.
Maybe if Chris said the Indoctrination Theory is true, people would stop believing it. #Thatwouldbesoawesome
Ah, but there's the double standard: people accuse Chris of being dishonest when he disproves their wishful thinking/conspiracy theories, but if he hinted at something they wanted to hear there'd be no question of its validity.
Look at how eager people are to pick apart dev comments in a fruitless search for "Project X 3000 super sekrit free DLC that adds 40 hours to the end game and confirms Shepard is a ferret" - never mind that they've all said multiple times that there's no more ending content planned.
#116
Posté 06 octobre 2012 - 04:24
Retaliation, as has been remarked several times now, was first leaked well before this list rolled around. So those of you acting like Clevernoob is the one who came up with Retaliation should take a second look.
Modifié par Fiery Phoenix, 06 octobre 2012 - 04:25 .
#117
Posté 06 octobre 2012 - 11:59
#118
Posté 06 octobre 2012 - 12:02
Fiery Phoenix wrote...
Realistically, if you think about it, both the expanded Priority: Earth mission and War Asset Cinematic packs are something that should, ideally, have been included with the Extended Cut. As it stands, I shall stick to my old skeptical ways and say this is wishful thinking until otherwise noted.
That was what I thought as well. Would have been in the EC.
The "must have all other DLC to play " would be a horrible, horrible idea and I'd like to think BW is smart enough to know that.
The only one of these that could even be true is more MP weapons going to SP. Would also like to see some new armor as well. That one was on the actual pastebin, I didn't see it on the TC's link.
Also, give Chris Priestly a break. He's not denying things for no reason, he's following orders.
Modifié par Asch Lavigne, 06 octobre 2012 - 12:06 .





Retour en haut






