1684 réponses à ce sujet

[OmegaRex]

Reptilian Rob wrote...

Also, why are they using the BF3 "we are trying to market this to the bros" cover?

Why not use a Mass Relay or something sci-fi-ish for the cover?

because this game is trying to market to the "bros"

[Justin2k]

Wonder how they can release a MS published game on PS3?  I thought impossible seeing as how MS own the rights for it. Maybe they bought themselves out of it. Maybe it was a 5 year deal. Or maybe a "triology" lets them out of it.  

I guess it's been five years. PS3 is so far behind MS nowadays that it probably doesn't matter to them.

Modifié par Justin2k, 26 septembre 2012 - 09:55 .

[Major Alenko]

I am still interested to know how PS3 is getting Mass Effect 1, I can remember a Microsoft rep commenting when ME2 was released for PS3 in a sort of troll comment that Xbox 360 was the only console where you could get the full Mass Effect experience... How did PS3 managed to get the rights for a Microsoft published game.

[Lee80]

Awesome news. I hope Mass Effect 1 will be released on the psn as well. Either way though I'm glad the first game will finally be playable by us PS3 owners!

[Nicktendo]

Jamie9 wrote...

Nicktendo wrote...
Don't you dare barf on that mode. It has more replay value than the campaign and is actually... fun *gasp*.

More replay value? You continuously do the same thing. Pick a square map. Fight against the AI for 20 minutes.

Pick another map. Fight against the AI for 20 minutes.

Pick another map. Fight against the AI for 20 minutes.

The MP has the replay value of walking up and down my street.

I love the way you just described the multiplayer. Because that's basically all you do in the campaign missions too, with extra cutscenes added.

[M Hedonist]

Nicktendo wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

No DLC? Booo.

Well, I guess at least it has Mass Effect 3’s critically acclaimed multiplayer mode. *barf*

Don't you dare barf on that mode. It has more replay value than the campaign and is actually... fun *gasp*.

I'd rather endlessly talk to Conrad Verner than ever playing a single MP game again.
Once EC was released and it was confirmed MP was no longer needed for the best ending I immediately promoted my Lvl20 characters and that was it.

[M Hedonist]

Nicktendo wrote...

I love the way you just described the multiplayer. Because that's basically all you do in the campaign missions too, with extra cutscenes added.

'extra cutscenes'? You gotta be one of those people who played the game in Action Mode.
Clearly, we played ME3 for different reasons. Good day, sir.

[Jamie9]

Nicktendo wrote...
I love the way you just described the multiplayer. Because that's basically all you do in the campaign missions too, with extra cutscenes added.

Exactly. It's called variety. Those dialogues break up what would become monotonous.

Also, you don't encounter the same map (apart from the Citadel) for at least 50 hours. Whereas in the MP you see the same maps every hour or two.

Plus, you know. I love the dialogue and story.

Modifié par Jamie9, 26 septembre 2012 - 10:04 .

[Reptilian Rob]

OmegaRex wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

Also, why are they using the BF3 "we are trying to market this to the bros" cover?

Why not use a Mass Relay or something sci-fi-ish for the cover?

because this game is trying to market to the "bros"

Oh...Ok. 

[Nicktendo]

Sauruz wrote...

Nicktendo wrote...

I love the way you just described the multiplayer. Because that's basically all you do in the campaign missions too, with extra cutscenes added.

'extra cutscenes'? You gotta be one of those people who played the game in Action Mode.
Clearly, we played ME3 for different reasons. Good day, sir.

No, but tell me exactly, what do you do in the Palaven mission? You shoot at AI.
What do you do in Thessia? You shoot at AI.
What do you do in the Ardhat-Yakshi monastery? You shoot AI.
What do you do on Earth? You shoot AI.
What do you do in Grissom Academy? You shoot AI.

If there wasn't cutscenes and some dialogue decisions to make in them, campaign missions would be the same thing as playing the multiplayer mode. It's waves of enemies after waves of enemies and only that. Don't try to act like its not the case.

And I'm only talking about the missions themselves, not the Normandy, not the Citadel, not the whole campaign.

Modifié par Nicktendo, 26 septembre 2012 - 10:09 .

[Jamie9]

Reptilian Rob wrote...

OmegaRex wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

Also, why are they using the BF3 "we are trying to market this to the bros" cover?

Why not use a Mass Relay or something sci-fi-ish for the cover?

because this game is trying to market to the "bros"

Oh...Ok. 

All us broskis already have Mass Effect.

[Reptilian Rob]

Jamie9 wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

OmegaRex wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

Also, why are they using the BF3 "we are trying to market this to the bros" cover?

Why not use a Mass Relay or something sci-fi-ish for the cover?

because this game is trying to market to the "bros"

Oh...Ok. 

All us broskis already have Mass Effect.

Well, give it ****ing back!

[Jamie9]

Nicktendo wrote...
No, but tell me exactly, what do you do in the Palaven mission? You shoot at AI.
What do you do in Thessia? You shoot at AI.
What do you do in the Ardhat-Yakshi monastery? You shoot AI.
What do you do on Earth? You shoot AI.
What do you do in Grisson Academy? You shoot AI.

If there wasn't cutscenes and some dialogue decisions to make in them, campaign missions would be the same thing as playing the multiplayer mode. It's waves of enemies after waves of enemies and only that. Don't try to act like its not the case.

No, it's not the case. I don't understand how you could even suggest it to be.

On all of those missions you mentioned, you don't stay in one place for too long. You're constantly on the move, the map is very large.

In MP, the map is very constricted. It's basically a square. You can run around it, but what you see is all there is. Plus, you fight continuously for 20 minutes.

There aren't many (read: any) moments in SP where you're fighting continuously for 20 minutes. They throw in something to change the pace, whether it be dialogue, a "running" section or an exploration section.

[RinuCZ]

It's nice that PS3 owners will also get a chance to play Mass Effect 1.

[Jamie9]

Reptilian Rob wrote...
Well, give it ****ing back!

This'll be my third copy. I'm sure I could give you one. :innocent:

[M Hedonist]

Nicktendo wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

Nicktendo wrote...

I love the way you just described the multiplayer. Because that's basically all you do in the campaign missions too, with extra cutscenes added.

'extra cutscenes'? You gotta be one of those people who played the game in Action Mode.
Clearly, we played ME3 for different reasons. Good day, sir.

No, but tell me exactly, what do you do in the Palaven mission? You shoot at AI.
What do you do in Thessia? You shoot at AI.
What do you do in the Ardhat-Yakshi monastery? You shoot AI.
What do you do on Earth? You shoot AI.
What do you do in Grisson Academy? You shoot AI.

If there wasn't cutscenes and some dialogue decisions to make in them, campaign missions would be the same thing as playing the multiplayer mode. It's waves of enemies after waves of enemies and only that. Don't try to act like its not the case.

In the campaign, the combat is just the means to an end. In multiplayer, there's no point to it. Just mindless shooting and more shooting and more shooting... so you can eventually get new characters and new guns and do some more shooting with them... and so on.

[ChrisRudson]

If this has all DLC's on all three games, then I'll buy it(also: if I'd get the future DLC's for free). But, I highly doubt that. We know how EA works.

[obZen DF]

I have a question:

If the Trilogy doesn't include the DLC's, will I be able to play DLC's wich are storaged on my HDD? As I already got all the DLC yet. If I buy the Trilogy, and I play with those discs, I will be able to play the DLC's right?

If the answer is yes, I will definitely buy the Trilogy

Modifié par obZen DF, 26 septembre 2012 - 10:16 .

[Jamie9]

obZen DF wrote...
I have a question:

If the Trilogy doesn't include the DLC's, will I be able to play DLC's wich are storaged on my HDD? As I already got all the DLC yet. If I buy the Trilogy, and I play with those discs, I will be able to play the DLC's right?

If the answer is yes, I will definitely buy the Trilogy

Since the games will connect to your BioWare/Origin account, then yes, it should allow you to download any and all DLC connected to it.

[OmegaRex]

ChrisRudson wrote...

If this has all DLC's on all three games, then I'll buy it(also: if I'd get the future DLC's for free). But, I highly doubt that. We know how EA works.

why would you get future DLCs for free?

that has nothing to do with how EA works. no company would ever do that..

[obZen DF]

Jamie9 wrote...

obZen DF wrote...
I have a question:

If the Trilogy doesn't include the DLC's, will I be able to play DLC's wich are storaged on my HDD? As I already got all the DLC yet. If I buy the Trilogy, and I play with those discs, I will be able to play the DLC's right?

If the answer is yes, I will definitely buy the Trilogy

Since the games will connect to your BioWare/Origin account, then yes, it should allow you to download any and all DLC connected to it.

I'm playing on the 360. Still a 'yes'? I'm a little confused you know:P

[devSin]

Commodore Q wrote...

I am still interested to know how PS3 is getting Mass Effect 1, I can remember a Microsoft rep commenting when ME2 was released for PS3 in a sort of troll comment that Xbox 360 was the only console where you could get the full Mass Effect experience... How did PS3 managed to get the rights for a Microsoft published game.

As far as I know, EA acquired the full rights to Mass Effect when they purchased BioWare.

Likely the only reason it wasn't brought to PS3 before now is because it would have been more trouble than it's worth (the ME2 port, which was a priority for them, didn't go smoothly at all). But now they have some experience under their belt, and it can be subsidized by a retail compilation (all three of these games—even ME3, and for good reason—can be purchased individually for a mere pittance these days).

Although this could be convenient for new players (although they can still get all three individually for cheaper), there doesn't seem to be anything here for people who already own all three games. (If the package included the DLC, they would have mentioned the bonus $50+ worth of content that is included for "free" in the compilation, so it's almost certainly just a reprint of the current discs, with nothing extra.)

[Jamie9]

OmegaRex wrote...
why would you get future DLCs for free?

that has nothing to do with how EA works. no company would ever do that..

Pre-ordering Borderlands 2 got you the next DLC to be released for free.

I'm pretty sure other games have given you the Season passes for free also.

So, it's unusual, but not unheard of.

[Dup3r]

obZen DF wrote...

I have a question:

If the Trilogy doesn't include the DLC's, will I be able to play DLC's wich are storaged on my HDD? As I already got all the DLC yet. If I buy the Trilogy, and I play with those discs, I will be able to play the DLC's right?

If the answer is yes, I will definitely buy the Trilogy

If you have the DLC already, then you're golden.  It's tied to your account.

[Toolbox 24]

Will the ME Trilogy be a different version to the stand-alone games - obviously the games will be the same but so far as showing on the Xbox... I'm a mini achievement **** and if I could play through the games again fresh from the start and re-gain my achievements that'd be pretty cool. So like instead of showing as "Mass Effect" for example, it would be "Mass Effect Trilogy Edition"...i dunno i'm hungry