Thing is men are more expendable because we can't have babies.Lotion Soronnar wrote...
KiddDaBeauty wrote...
Please don't assume such things. It's not very polite to imply people do not care for the equality of men.Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Yeah, yeah...your skewed political agenda (funny how positive things coming from discrimination for women and negative from men are always forgotten..) concernes me not
Frankly, most injustices toward men seem to be fixable by elevating the women anyway. Men can cry when crying is no longer associated with feminine weakness, men can keep parental rights more easily in custody battles when women aren't considered to be nurturing mothers by nature, and men can get the right to stay out of the draft when we drop the notion how women are ill suited for military life - or perhaps we're all drafted with no excuses, but at least that's equality.
As for "positive things" to come out of discrimination, I have a hard time believing there is such a thing from the view of society at large.
Oh no?
It's "women and children first" no?
Men have trought history been expendalbe.
Women were precious and to be protected, men were given the deadliest jobs. That's the prime reason why men were warriors (tough the physical advantage helped).
If a woman slaps a man on TV, whats your first reaction? Probably "he must have earned it"
If a man slaps a woman on TV, what's your first reaction? Probably "that bastard, how can he?"
Don't speak of compeltely equality.
It doesn't exist. It will never happen. and frankly I don't even see a need for it. Men and women aren't compeltey the same and I dont' see why they should be treated compeltely the same, in every last detail.
But that's neither here nor there and it's off-topic.
1 man can impregnate alot of women
but a woman has a limit on how many children she can safely bare





Retour en haut







