411 réponses à ce sujet

[Emzamination]

This was an Idea already touched upon in dragon age 2 with hawke being able to make feynriel tranquil in the fade.I think it's only appropriate that if we're able to take one side or the other in Da3, we get access to all their perks as well.

Agree?

[LolaLei]

If it gives us extra options then sure, I'm game.

[MisterJB]

Yes, please.

[ManOfSteel]

 Sure. T'would give players additional options and improve replayability. 
Also, Templars > Mages, so yes. 

Modifié par DoomHK, 27 septembre 2012 - 11:03 .

[Shadow Fox]

*waits for the flamewar to start*

[Wulfram]

Depends who they're working for and what sort of authority they exercise.

(Though with the events of Asunder wouldn't it make more sense to just kill them?)

[Emzamination]

Wulfram wrote...

Depends who they're working for and what sort of authority they exercise.

(Though with the events of Asunder wouldn't it make more sense to just kill them?)

Killing them is such a waste tho...Making them tranquil ensures they're no longer a threat and also frees up their thought processes to be more effective at manual labor, secretary work , enchanting templar armor and weaponry.The tranquil make indispensable human resources.

Modifié par Emzamination, 27 septembre 2012 - 11:18 .

[TsaiMeLemoni]

I think so. I don't think it should happen left and right, but it would be an interesting mechanic.

[Eveangaline]

Sure. I'd probably never do it except in an evil or obsessively anti-mage run, but the option could be cool

[TheJediSaint]

Wulfram wrote...

Depends who they're working for and what sort of authority they exercise.

(Though with the events of Asunder wouldn't it make more sense to just kill them?)

Actually, given the events of Asunder, I'd be more interested in seeing what's involved in reversing the process.

[Shadow Fox]

Emzamination wrote...

Wulfram wrote...

Depends who they're working for and what sort of authority they exercise.

(Though with the events of Asunder wouldn't it make more sense to just kill them?)

Killing them is such a waste tho...Making them tranquil ensures they're no longer a threat and also frees up their thought processes to be more effective at manual labor, secretary work , enchanting templar armor and weaponry.The tranquil make indispensable human resources.

*gets gasoline*

[EricHVela]

And the guilt when finding out that the mage was innocent of whatever "crime"? Yes.

Seriously. This is a great plot device to use just for that alone. All known signs point to the mage, but the player missed some clues and performed the rite on an innocent person.

[TsaiMeLemoni]

ReggarBlane wrote...

And the guilt when finding out that the mage was innocent of whatever "crime"? Yes.

Seriously. This is a great plot device to use just for that alone. All known signs point to the mage, but the player missed some clues and performed the rite on an innocent person.

Love it, gives some oomph for people playing a sane PC character, or would allow you to wallow in evil if you did it without caring about the mage's innocence.

[Emzamination]

TsaiMeLemoni wrote...

ReggarBlane wrote...

And the guilt when finding out that the mage was innocent of whatever "crime"? Yes.

Seriously. This is a great plot device to use just for that alone. All known signs point to the mage, but the player missed some clues and performed the rite on an innocent person.

Love it, gives some oomph for people playing a sane PC character, or would allow you to wallow in evil if you did it without caring about the mage's innocence.

The emotional depth of such a choice is a huge plus.

[BouncyFrag]

If Anders shows up, then absolutely.

[Orian Tabris]

As a pro-templar specific quest, I am all for this. Granted, I'll be siding with the mages most if not all the time.

[Maria Caliban]

Emzamination wrote...
Should Pro-templar Inquisitors be able to invoke the rite of tranquility?

No.

That makes as much sense as lawyers arresting people.

[MichaelStuart]

Why not just kill them?

But as for being able to invoke the rite of tranquility. I see no reason not to allow it.

Modifié par MichaelStuart, 27 septembre 2012 - 11:44 .

[thats1evildude]

Tranquility is no longer the solution, as it now can be reversed. No, to contain the threat of mages, only one option is left to us: we must put them all to the sword. It's the only way to be sure.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 28 septembre 2012 - 12:02 .

[LobselVith8]

BouncyFrag wrote...

If Anders shows up, then absolutely.

I don't think it would work on an abomination.

[Emzamination]

Maria Caliban wrote...

Emzamination wrote...
Should Pro-templar Inquisitors be able to invoke the rite of tranquility?

No.

That makes as much sense as lawyers arresting people.

In war the status quo goes right out the window.

[Melca36]

Nope. I want a neutral character. I have no interest in playing a prejudiced zealot.

[cJohnOne]

No because there isn't any Goverment authority or Chruch authority. Come to think of it why does the church have the right to make someone tranquil? It should be the Government, no?

[Lithuasil]

Why would a... "efficient" mage-inquisitor not want to invoke the right under certain circumstances as well?