I agree.2112.rush wrote...
Sometimes I think the writers tried too hard to "give the player choices", and ended up missing the point badly.
Also, nice name.
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
I agree.2112.rush wrote...
Sometimes I think the writers tried too hard to "give the player choices", and ended up missing the point badly.
Modifié par David7204, 28 septembre 2012 - 05:22 .
Modifié par SpamBot2000, 28 septembre 2012 - 06:58 .
Modifié par jkflipflopDAO, 28 septembre 2012 - 07:12 .
inversevideo wrote...
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
Anything better than Red Green or Blue.
The_Other_M wrote...
I would've liked a "Suicide Mission"-like scenario with your accumulated War Assets instead.
Have Jack & her Grissom Academy students provide support.
Aria's merc squads using hit & run tactics.
The Rachni on the front lines side-by-side with the Krogan's on their Dinosaur mounts.
The Geth providing heavy ground support with their Geth Collossus and Infiltrators.
Quarians providing air & space support,.
Salarian's using their stealth squads on ground & extra defense in space..etc.etc
You know, what most of us expected our War assets to do from the get-go.
No. This is a terrible idea. ME3 contained too few substantive player choices, in comparison to the first two games, as it is.Normandy_Captain wrote...
let me explain. everything plays out normal. shep goes on the citadel, illusive man, anderson dies. shep goes to the control panel and activates it. instead of the space mumbo jumbo, the catalyst acts as a sort of an emp, weakening the reapers power by half. depending on ems certain things happen. Low: Reapers wipe out fleet, Harbinger destroys catalyst.medium: Reapers defeated, high casualties, Harbinger destroys catalyst.High: Reapers defeated, low casualties, Harbinger destroys catalyst .Very high: ( as in convince TIM ren. or par) Reapers defeated, low casualties, Harbinger destroyed before catalyst is destroyed. Shepard wanders off the citadel to meet his crew waiting for him.of course war assets would be shown. would having no final choice but what I presented. ( roughly ) been prefered?
GT Zazzerka wrote...
This, and only this.Icinix wrote...
Yes.
There did not need to be a choice at the end - our choices leading up to it should have determined our ending.
TheRealJayDee wrote...
GT Zazzerka wrote...
This, and only this.Icinix wrote...
Yes.
There did not need to be a choice at the end - our choices leading up to it should have determined our ending.
Yes.
Modifié par tvman099, 28 septembre 2012 - 01:40 .
Demon560 wrote...
Okay, why the heck didn't we get something like this, and yeah would have been better than the original endings IMO.
Modifié par Tronar, 28 septembre 2012 - 04:55 .
Modifié par Mahrac, 28 septembre 2012 - 05:06 .