LobselVith8 wrote...
I think it's fair game. The Warden being a blood mage is no different than Duncan's example of Grey Wardens using blood magic to combat the darkspawn, so it's fair to cite the protagonist, as there is already a precedent for using blood magic to benefit the people of Thedas. The Hero of Ferelden is simply another Warden mage using blood magic to defeat the darkspawn. Apostate Hawke being a good blood mage makes him no different than Merrill, who also uses blood magic and doesn't abuse her abilities.
It really isn't. The PC (and the party, usually) is controlled by an outside force and, once again, isn't held to the same standard as the rest of the game world. Remember all the complaints about having/being a mage in DA2? The Templar just ignored you, even before they had any reason to.
LobselVith8 wrote...
We don't really know what most blood mages are like; the protagonists of Dragon Age are more likely to run into an enemy they will fight, rather than someone they will have a philosophical debate with. Remember, Dragon Age II was the game that gave us blood mage Decimus, who thought Merrill was one of the templars.
Well, most blood mages are in the Tevinter Imperium and use the blood of their slaves, most of the time.
In DA:O, we see (prominent):
Jowan :: Supposedly learned it from books, not a bad guy, but made a lot of mistakes.
Avernus :: Mind control, demon summoning and experiments on fellow Wardens.
Uldred :: Forcing mages to explode into Abominations, torture, demon summoning.
Zatherian :: Cursed a group of people
Caladrius :: Slaving and Sacrifice
Mad Hermit :: Chilling in the woods
Well, one of them is a decent person, at least (Jowan).





Retour en haut





