Cultist wrote...
Devs already said that only one specialization will be allowed. So either Blood Mage or Spirit healer, assuming they will leave SH for us.
Damn. I thought it was fun coming up with different combinations.
Cultist wrote...
Devs already said that only one specialization will be allowed. So either Blood Mage or Spirit healer, assuming they will leave SH for us.
LobselVith8 wrote...
I respected Merrill for being proactive about the plight of the People. Rather than doing nothing, she took steps to restore technology that baffled the Tevinter Magisters, and sought to create a functional Eluvian. Technology that may have been able to dramatically improve the lives of the People. She was a proficient blood mage who refused to simply accept the decline of her people.
Modifié par Riverdaleswhiteflash, 15 octobre 2012 - 11:23 .
DPSSOC wrote...
LobselVith8 wrote...
I respected Merrill for being proactive about the plight of the People. Rather than doing nothing, she took steps to restore technology that baffled the Tevinter Magisters, and sought to create a functional Eluvian. Technology that may have been able to dramatically improve the lives of the People. She was a proficient blood mage who refused to simply accept the decline of her people.
Off topic I know but I have to disagree here. Merrill's actions, even had they gone ideally, would only worsen the plight of the People. The Dalish's problem is that they're stuck living in the past, never building anything new because of it. Had the Dalish not been obsessed with recovering what was lost the history of the Dales might have gone very differently. Maybe they would have accepted the presence of a Chantry for those among them who opted to follow that belief, maybe there wouldn't have been any military hostility from Orlais. We'll never know admittedly but it's something to think about.
Militant isolationism and fixating on the past are not conducive to a productive society, and the Dalish cannot move forward until they stop looking back. Marethari was the first progressive Dalish elf since the fall, she was the first one to look at their past and say, "Let's drop it."
Sorry for the off topic it just sets me off when people talk about the Dalish obsession as a good thing.
Marethari never said anything of the kind. She specifically (and only) wanted Merrill to abandon restoration of the eluvian because she erroneously believed it to be dangerous. The ancient elves clearly had magic and knowledge that is far superior to anything that anyone in Thedas has currently. Are you seriously saying that none of that stuff is worth knowing or having just because it's "in the past"?DPSSOC wrote...
LobselVith8 wrote...
I respected Merrill for being proactive about the plight of the People. Rather than doing nothing, she took steps to restore technology that baffled the Tevinter Magisters, and sought to create a functional Eluvian. Technology that may have been able to dramatically improve the lives of the People. She was a proficient blood mage who refused to simply accept the decline of her people.
Off topic I know but I have to disagree here. Merrill's actions, even had they gone ideally, would only worsen the plight of the People. The Dalish's problem is that they're stuck living in the past, never building anything new because of it. Had the Dalish not been obsessed with recovering what was lost the history of the Dales might have gone very differently. Maybe they would have accepted the presence of a Chantry for those among them who opted to follow that belief, maybe there wouldn't have been any military hostility from Orlais. We'll never know admittedly but it's something to think about.
Militant isolationism and fixating on the past are not conducive to a productive society, and the Dalish cannot move forward until they stop looking back. Marethari was the first progressive Dalish elf since the fall, she was the first one to look at their past and say, "Let's drop it."
Sorry for the off topic it just sets me off when people talk about the Dalish obsession as a good thing.
BlueMagitek wrote...
LobselVith8 wrote...
I respected Merrill for being proactive about the plight of the People. Rather than doing nothing, she took steps to restore technology that baffled the Tevinter Magisters, and sought to create a functional Eluvian. Technology that may have been able to dramatically improve the lives of the People. She was a proficient blood mage who refused to simply accept the decline of her people.
Marethari argues against the research, but she doesn't seem to have conducted any research into the Eluvian. Her argument was initially that she didn't think the ancestors wanted the Eluvian to be found (despite the ancient elves losing the Eluvians because of the conquest by Tevinter), and the latter argument was that she believed the Eluvian would be used by Audacity to escape, despite the fact that it was sundered from the Fade and trapped in a totem by ancient magic.
Tamlen and Mahariel perished because they were infected by the taint in the Eluvian, which was successfully removed by Merrill. She also left the clan to pursue her effort into restoring technology that might have a positive impact on the elves. Merrill leaves the clan to pursue the restoration of the Eluvian, extrapolating information from the shard and studying the lore on the Eluvian.
Decimus was an insane buffoon. The mage antagonists in Dragon Age II were basically insane lunatics who seldom made any sense in their actions or motives. No one should confuse Merrill for a templar, after all.
I'm sure Karl and Alain would disagree.
Yet The Warden being a blood mage has precedent from Duncan's revelation in the Magi Origin about Grey Warden mages using blood magic to defeat the darkspawn, and apostate Hawke being a blood mage is no different than Merrill using her blood magic to help people.
How convenient that you happen to remove all of her problems for her, then.
I would hardly use the worst case as the average experience for all mages. And there's yet to be a better, feasible alternative offered.
You don't seem to get it; the PC doesn't really interact with the world the same was the NPCs do. They're controlled by the player. A Human Noble for example, if an NPC, would probably have greater belief in the Chantry than your average HN PC. The PC Mage can make a deal with the demon for Connor's soul and just reload, trolol, got blood magic with no problem. Using someone who isn't bound by the same rules as everyone else as an example isn't fair.
Youth4Ever wrote...
LobselVith8 wrote...
Youth4Ever wrote...
LobselVith8 wrote...
I’m not nickpicking, I’m addressing the facts.
You’re the one who decides to ignore certain facts if they don’t line up with your point of view.
You mean you actually use facts to support your arguments outside of our debate??? Whoa!
Coming from the person who ignores the information that comes from codex entries, characters, and lore because it disproves your argument?
Last time I checked an opinion or biased POV didn't constitute factual evidence.
BlueMagitek wrote...
She manipulated everyone into getting her way
BlueMagitek wrote...
I would agree, but for the way he reacts when you call him out on it. From my memory, he seems resigned, and I believe he agrees that he crossed a line. But it has been a while.
BlueMagitek wrote...
But again, while he can unlock the power of the taint for all Wardens, can he sustain all Wardens for centuries or is it just something he can teach other mages? I suppose it doesn't matter.
Warrior Craess wrote...
Umm if codex and lore isn't factual basis, in a game with no real history, Then what exactly is fact? Game mechanic descriptions? The magic 8-ball? einey meeny miny moe?
Hate to burst your bubble, but in a fictional world, what the authors write as lore and codex or history is indeed factual. So if the codex says something it's "fact" becuase that what the authors of the game/book/movie want you to know. (actually I don't hate bursting your bubble at all, it's rather fun)
granted what npc's say, which often contradicts each other, should be viewed as their personal opinion. But lore, codex, and history should be taken as factual, becuase that is the only way for the creators of the fiction to build history into their game.
Dave of Canada wrote...
Blood Mage writings: "to learn blood magic, summon a demon! force it to teach you or else you'll be an abomination! have fun!".
Lotion_Soronnar wrote...
Yes they do.
Lotion_Soronnar wrote...
It lacks instant communications
Lotion_Soronnar wrote...
It lacks proper farming techniques
Lotion_Soronnar wrote...
Actually you did.
Lotion_Soronnar wrote...
So what?
Lotion_Soronnar wrote...
You speak as if it's the Chantry that gave a decree that elves have to live in squalor
Lotion_Soronnar wrote...
Waht? Alistair and Wynnes oppinion are not jstu that? Oppinions?
Can you?
I still don't know what you wanted to say.
Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 16 octobre 2012 - 02:13 .
I can argue that the Litany only exist for gampleay reasons at all.
You do realize it was the Chantry that stepped in and stopped the proto templars from simply killing any mage they found right?KainD wrote...
I am pro mage freedom, but if there is no way to stop the circle from existing then I agree with LobselVith8, templars should be an organization that is not tied to the chantry in any way.
Warrior Craess wrote...
So Marenthari, who already sent me to the fade to free a mage from demons, is worried that I can't do it again? Merrill becomes a powerful mage by the end of the game, but she's no dreamer. So why should marenthari suddenly doubt Hawke? Why not let Merrill take the risk, that she obviously wants to take, knowning Hawke is there to stop her if things go terribly wrong? Instead of being all noble and self sacrificing (wait she's an apostate right so noble self sacrafising shouldn't be possible)?
Merrill is about as upfront about the mirror as you can get. She never leads you to belief that she doesn't deal with demons. In fact you know about that right from the start. And while she's a bit nieve, she's fairly smart about distrusting demons.
Your opinion that Merrill conned you is just that, nothing but an opinion. please stop trying to lay it off as fact. Personally I think your idea that merril wanted you to kill her old keeper and the clan is idiotic, but thats just my opinion and may not be factual at all.
And even if what you said is true (it's not in my case, I understood what merril was doing from the beginning) how is her actions any worse than Isebella's? With out Isebella stealing a book, the Qunari are never in Kirkwall, and the reagent would still be alive, and there would never have been a show done over who was in charge of Kirkwalll.
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
No she didn't. That's an erroneous belief that is backed up nowhere in the game and is refuted constantly.
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
Only if the Warden says it was monstrous, as he says "From a fellow Warden that means something".
We
know little of just what those Wardens with him thought of it, and that
says nothing about how he felt doing it. He says it was necessary.
Doesn't mean he liked doing it.
More
then likely something other Mages could do, unless he refines his
research to a point where non-Mages can do similar things.
But it
doesn't matter. He's taken very thorough notes during his entrapment in
the Tower, and continues to do so if he's allowed to continue his work
without restrictions -- and if the Architect's alive -- to the point
where fellow Warden mages can pick up where he left off when the Taint
finally claims him.
Which is, according to his letter in DAII,
closer then ever. Whether he's actually succumbed to the Calling by the
time of DAIII I don't know.
Doesn't she go ahead and throw away the mirror unless you're best friends, after the Keeper was slain? How convenient.
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
Yeah... that doesn't say anything about her "manipulating events and people" like you want to believe. She never wanted the Keeper to die -- in fact, she'll flat out tell you that as she's in tears, saying SHE should've been the one to die if someone had to.
The one is not related to the other. The Keeper's death was not something Merrill engineered. The clan's death because they attempted to murder Merrill and company was not something Merrill engineered.
Those were unknown things that Merrill did not expect to happen, nor want to happen.
I don't even know where you're getting that idea, because there's nothing in-game to support it.
Guest_Puddi III_*
Please stop this line of questioning. It's making me extraordinarily angry IRL and I suspect you don't want to actually cause pain, hence I've decided to inform you.And yet she wasn't. How terribly convenient. I think you are underestimating her. After all, she's very sneaky.
Guest_Puddi III_*
I guessed as much. I was speaking to Magitek.Filament wrote...
I was just kidding around.
Modifié par Medhia Nox, 16 octobre 2012 - 03:50 .
Xilizhra wrote...
Please stop this line of questioning. It's making me extraordinarily angry IRL and I suspect you don't want to actually cause pain, hence I've decided to inform you.And yet she wasn't. How terribly convenient. I think you are underestimating her. After all, she's very sneaky.
jMedhia Nox wrote...
"I have no idea what this thing is
- what it's capable of -
how it came to be
- the nature of the realm it exists in
- how it possesses others
BlueMagitek wrote...
And yet she wasn't.
Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 16 octobre 2012 - 04:07 .