Xilizhra wrote...
The fluff says no such thing about "average" abominations, just saying that there are some powerful ones.Actually, you can't. The fluff makes clear that abominations are, on average, much more powerful than the ones the Wardens face. My speculation was on how much more on average.
Does a Gaider post count as fluff? Because he heavily implies that abominations are more dangerous than either the mage or the demon put together, due to having both their magic and the mage's. Compare this to the basically disposable cannon fodder that they are in-game.
Yes, and it wouldn't have happened if the Circle wasn't so bad that Isolde felt the need to keep Connor out of it.Because he created more possessed creatures. That is one of the dangers I mentioned. Besides, Connor was still ridiculously broken compared to, say Ser Perth. The Redcliffe thing would have ended even worse if the Warden wasn't there.
That's not the current point, and only a small bit of Isolde's motivation.
And because most demons are weak.Nuclear explosions are rare because we know how to prevent them. Abominations are the same way.
Beside the point, and doesn't help your case for abolishing the Harrowing.
If I were in charge of a mage revolution, the only thing I'd drop would be the religion. Everything else is if nothing else practical, it's just the internalization of religiously based stigmas that doesn't help. That tranquil whose Journal came up might have been fine without the horror stories he got from his grandmother, combined with the Chantry teaching that there's something innately sinful about magic just because it has the power to do these horrible things. I'd even keep the Templars, or at least such as could be made to do their jobs reasonably.
Modifié par Riverdaleswhiteflash, 30 octobre 2012 - 02:56 .





Retour en haut





