Fixers0 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
I am not watching an hour and a half video. Give me one piece of evidence that can only be bad writing.
Anderson.
You'll have to explain that one more. What about him?
His Armor.
His Location.
His Dialogue.
His Behaviour.
His Death.
BleedingUranium wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
I am not watching an hour and a half video. Give me one piece of evidence that can only be bad writing.
Anderson.
You'll have to explain that one more. What about him?
His Armor.
His Location.
His Dialogue.
His Behaviour.
His Death.
All makes sense in IT.
Fixers0 wrote...
Still makes Bad writing.
Modifié par BleedingUranium, 29 septembre 2012 - 07:17 .
BleedingUranium wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
Still makes Bad writing.
...what? No, it's one or the other.
Davik Kang wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
Still makes Bad writing.
...what? No, it's one or the other.
Dude, these guys have indoctrinated themselves into believing that Bioware screwed up. Reasoning with logic just doesn't come into it any more.
BleedingUranium wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
Still makes Bad writing.
...what? No, it's one or the other.
Modifié par Fixers0, 29 septembre 2012 - 07:22 .
BleedingUranium wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
Still makes Bad writing.
...what? No, it's one or the other.
Fixers0 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
Still makes Bad writing.
...what? No, it's one or the other.
How so?
You can headcannon Anderson not being at the conduit in London as a Hallucination, but it's merely conjecture, But it's a fact that Anderson is not there, though he claims to have followed Shepard up, making inconsistand (bad) writing.
DeathScepter wrote...
I can prove that Reapers can break the fourth wall with Indoctrination. Yes We are all indoctrinated. I do suspect I am indoctrinated for a while due to oily shadow dreams.
Also I do suspect that Shepard suffered from a fever dream during arrival while he was unconscience.
Fixers0 wrote...
But it's a fact that Anderson is not there, though he claims to have followed Shepard up, making inconsistent (bad) writing.
BleedingUranium wrote...
I don't follow, according to IT, everything after Shep gets lased by Harby happens in his head?
BleedingUranium wrote...
Also, if you want to call IT headcanon, then you have to call Literal headcanon too. Equally as valid.
Modifié par Fixers0, 29 septembre 2012 - 07:27 .
TJBartlemus wrote...
DeathScepter wrote...
I can prove that Reapers can break the fourth wall with Indoctrination. Yes We are all indoctrinated. I do suspect I am indoctrinated for a while due to oily shadow dreams.
Also I do suspect that Shepard suffered from a fever dream during arrival while he was unconscience.
http://t1.gstatic.co...KsiyavtDlV42E-Q
TJBartlemus wrote...
DeathScepter wrote...
I can prove that Reapers can break the fourth wall with Indoctrination. Yes We are all indoctrinated. I do suspect I am indoctrinated for a while due to oily shadow dreams.
Also I do suspect that Shepard suffered from a fever dream during arrival while he was unconscience.
http://t1.gstatic.co...KsiyavtDlV42E-Q
Davik Kang wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
But it's a fact that Anderson is not there, though he claims to have followed Shepard up, making inconsistent (bad) writing.
FACT. PROOF!!
Fixers0 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
I don't follow, according to IT, everything after Shep gets lased by Harby happens in his head?
There's the headcannon, you assume it's a hallucination (Conjecture) without the narative specifying it.BleedingUranium wrote...
Also, if you want to call IT headcanon, then you have to call Literal headcanon too. Equally as valid.
No, because assuming it's a hallucination is conjecure whilst the game proves that Anderson wasn't at the Conduit acces in London even though the game claims that he followed Shepard up.
Fixers0 wrote...
Davik Kang wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
But it's a fact that Anderson is not there, though he claims to have followed Shepard up, making inconsistent (bad) writing.
FACT. PROOF!!
Thank's for agreeining with me, I knew you would see reason in time.
BleedingUranium wrote...
It's clear you don't understand what equally means. It means the same. You're trying to take everything literally while ignoring a statement by Bioware. You can't cherry pick.
Modifié par Fixers0, 29 septembre 2012 - 07:32 .
MajorKellyRisner wrote...
How is this relevant? Anderson could have followed Shepard up. You don't know that he didn't
chasemme wrote...
IT makes people happier with the endings.
Happy people don't complain as much for ending/reunion DLC.
Fewer people complaining means less chance for said DLC. (If the chance existed.)
So non-IT'ers must convert the IT community to be as unhappy as they are.
IT must die!
Fixers0 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
It's clear you don't understand what equally means. It means the same. You're trying to take everything literally while ignoring a statement by Bioware. You can't cherry pick.
It's valid to headcannon IT, nothing wrong with that, it is however a fact that the narative remains inconsitent as i've just proven.
Fixers0 wrote...
MajorKellyRisner wrote...
How is this relevant? Anderson could have followed Shepard up. You don't know that he didn't
He did, that's what the narative tells us, yet Anderson was nowhere to be seen at the Conduit acces in London.
Fixers0 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
I am not watching an hour and a half video. Give me one piece of evidence that can only be bad writing.
Anderson.
You'll have to explain that one more. What about him?
His Armor.
His Location.
His Dialogue.
His Behaviour.
His Death.
..None of those are bad.
Modifié par dreman9999, 29 septembre 2012 - 07:34 .
BleedingUranium wrote...
I don't follow, according to IT, everything after Shep gets lased by Harby happens in his head? How is that relevant. Also, if you want to call IT headcanon, then you have to call Literal headcanon too. Equally as valid.
Retour en haut