Guns wrote...
3. Exalted March on both. Hail The Maker, Andraste, and the Chantry.
Hail brother!
Guns wrote...
3. Exalted March on both. Hail The Maker, Andraste, and the Chantry.
Modifié par Zeleen, 29 octobre 2012 - 08:10 .
Alistair: So I suppose once I'm actually king I could end up in negotiations with the Qunari one day.
Sten: My people do not negotiate.
Alistair: What do you mean? They negotiated a peace treaty after the war, and as far as I know they've kept to its terms.
Sten: They signed a piece of paper. But only because they knew that you believed in it.
Alistair: And what is the difference between that and negotiating?
Sten: They stopped fighting for their own reasons. And they will resume it again, one day. The agreement means nothing to them.
Alistair: But I thought you said your people believed in honor.
Sten: They do. The honor of the Qunari is what will bring our warships back to your shores.
Modifié par Atrabilious, 29 octobre 2012 - 08:11 .
Modifié par EpicBoot2daFace, 29 octobre 2012 - 08:21 .
That is why I wouldn't side with Tevinter, either. As soon as you have any sort of power, you have to look over your shoulder everyday and everywhere you go. There's really no place in Tevinter society where one can live in peace without a master and without living in fear of your enemies, or anybody. And as Danarius has shown, associating with somone who has any sort of power, will not mean you are free of them, it only means that they will side with you for the purpose of helping them.Atrabilious wrote...
Tevinter.
As much as I think the Qunari/Kossith are quite frankly the coolest society/race, and are exceedingly interesting, siding with them seems like an incredibly bad idea. Qunari culture makes Tevinter's idea of slavery look tame. Not to mention their military force. If you were to side with them to solve any sort of Tevinter vs. Qunari conflict, after the fight is done guess who's next on the Qunari hitlist?
Zkyire wrote...
You'd have a better quality of life with the Qunari.
..provided you don't care about spending your entire life doing one task whether you like it or not.
But I'd probably side with Tevinter., albeit not with much enthusiasm.
Modifié par Huntress, 06 novembre 2012 - 04:06 .
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Qunari aren't slaves. It's adorable that people try and stamp that label on to them, but it really just shows your ignorance.
Modifié par Foopydoopydoo, 06 novembre 2012 - 08:00 .
So you would rather think about the meaning of life, than have meaning in your life. That's cool, but forgive me for claiming that not all would agree with you.KainD wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Qunari aren't slaves. It's adorable that people try and stamp that label on to them, but it really just shows your ignorance.
Nah they are not slaves, they are just animals. No need to think about meaning of life and finding something for yourself, let's just exist, work and die, and make everyone else do the same.
Killing a qunari is like kiiling a deer.
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Qunari aren't slaves. It's adorable that people try and stamp that label on to them, but it really just shows your ignorance.
Modifié par Fleshdress, 07 novembre 2012 - 12:28 .
Being told what "your role is" is not slavery. Slavery would require people being treated like property, sold and bought. Qunari are not. Hence they aren't slaves. While you may find the way of life for the Qunari abhorrent, that is all fine, but to call it slavery is just incorrect.Fleshdress wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Qunari aren't slaves. It's adorable that people try and stamp that label on to them, but it really just shows your ignorance.
Erm, not ignorance. My translation. If you feel that being born (Re-born into the Kossith religion??) into a roll that someone else chooses for you and being told to "fulfill that role or die" is freedom then I am sorry but we differ in opinions, but it certainly doesn't make me ignorant.
I just don't see how being captured by slavers, sold to a Magister and being told "In my house this is your role, do your duty to my expectaions or I am within my rights to end your llife" is very different from being taken over and given to a religion and being told "In our religion ths is your role, do your duty or I am within my rights to end your life."
Then what is it?EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Being told what "your role is" is not slavery.
Plaintiff wrote...
Then what is it?EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Being told what "your role is" is not slavery.
If you are stripped of your personal freedoms and forced into a particular role, with non-compliance being punished by chemical lobotomy or death, then how are you anything other than a slave?