Why?CronicleChicken wrote...
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Control does all that as well, without a synthetic genocide.Samtheman63 wrote...
Destroy preserves all life in the galaxy and rids the galaxy of the reapers.That's not their best weapon: indoctrination is.The reapers have killed trillions of people, squashed down their bodies and turned them into mobile death machines. Listening to any suggestion from the reapers is foolish, especially when we've known for 3 games that one of their best weapons is manipulating people.
Of course, you're also projecting something onto the Reapers that we learn they've never had: free will. Someone compelled to take an action, versus someone who does it on their own will, are two different contexts.You aren't asking the Reapers to do what you want, you're forcing them.Leaving them alive is too big of a risk, living along side them is even worse. No one in the right mind would be able to live with the reapers after what they have down, how on earth can you even begin to trust them?
For being slaves to someone else? What would be the point?Don't they deserve to be punished?
The person ultimately responsible, the Catalyst, is removed.
I think that the Catalyst is a Reaper.
There wasn't an indoctrination attempt throught the game.If the Catalyst is a Reaper and he presented the options to you in such a way to guide you to a particular choice. Suggestive reasoning. I think this is an indoctrination attempt like it was throughout the whole ME3 game.
It isn't.Think about, if the Indoctrination Theory is true
What if the Reapers never killed us? What if Javik's Prothean Empire Reborn succeeded? What if what if what if?
We could talk about infinite imaginary worlds in which key things are different throughout the franchise. Or we can talk about what actually is true in the game.





Retour en haut







