It was up to the player to determine whether their character was a spoiled brat or not. Absence of a "street rat" origin doesn't make the race as a whole worse, that's just personal preference. Were dwarves a bad race choice because there wasn't a surface dwarf origin, for example?Felya87 wrote...
humans in DA:O were a sad race (roleplayng speaking) thier origins are the most banal. Or a spoiled rich brat or a sad mage. (between the two I prefer the mage). there isn't the "street rat" version of the human, who, for my taste, is the best and the one who gives greater sadisfaction.
Eh? What makes humans the easiest race to play? What makes dwarves or elves more complex?I think those statistic who Anti-Dwarf and Elf references constantly, are very idiotic. The first game can be made with a human, because it seems the easiest race in the game, with no flaw etcetera. and someone who is playng for the first time, the though is: "well, I don't know how will be the game...I try the easiest race, so I can play with less problems."
Only 15% played as elves, EVER, only 5% played as dwarves, EVER, so... no.So is not realistic. A lot of people may have played as human at first, but loved much more their second game with another race.
I appreciate when there is a choice for what race I want to play in a game, but I tend to pick humans, unless said other races have something really compelling about them. I played the dwarf commoner origin also, and while it was an interesting new take *on dwarves*, that could as well have been a human slum populated by human rabble.
I like playing humans because I like the idea of my character starting in a place of relative "normalcy" and then going on to have an amazing journey. That feeling just comes most easily with a human character to me. Were I to play an elf or dwarf, my character would already be one of the exotic things in the world and lessen that feeling for me.
Modifié par Gileadan, 10 octobre 2012 - 02:50 .





Retour en haut





