mrs_anomaly wrote...
SPOILERS:
I'm about to finish my second playthrough of ME3. I just landed on Earth....my husband wanted to watch football so I just saved and got on Youtube because I haven't spoiled myself on the newer extended cut endings yet.
Wow. I am officially a hypocrite. I say this because I was a staunchly interested in having a "good death" to save the Galaxy. I didn't care how- at least let me die to win if necessary and give me a good ending and let me know what happens a bit afterwards. An epilogue.
Now that I've seen the variations that would apply to my Sheps- I'm just thinking...I want my Shepard to survive. But I know that really doesn't even make sense. Shepard had so little chance of surviving this entire time anyway and she made the final decision to save the Galaxy. But but but..
I'm going to have to read a novel with an HEA to get me out of this post ME3 blues
. At least ..the galaxy was saved.
I can sympathize. I think the problem is that many, if not most, of us wanted to go out in our own terms, if at all. The Crucible robs us of that. But, when you think about it, Shepard knows almost from the get go that the Crucible is their only chance to defeat the Reapers. We're talking about using a weapon that nobody knows how it works or what exactly it does, but Shepard, Hackett, Anderson, everyone's willing to risk it if it means defeating the Reapers. I think this choice represents Shepard's willingness to do whatever it takes to stop the Reapers, no matter the cost.
So, when he ultimately faces the Catalyst and his choices, what exactly is the problem? Why the sudden change of heart? Is Shepard no longer willing to make a sacrifice to stop the Reapers? What changed? The moment you chose to use an unknown quantity you accepted the possibility there might be unintended consequences. And, let's face it, at least you get three choices to stop the Reapers (even if Synthesis makes no sense).
The question we should ask ourselves is, I think, how far are we prepared to go to stop the Reapers?