Aller au contenu

Photo

Why Lambert and the Templars are hypocrites.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
158 réponses à ce sujet

#26
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

eye basher wrote...

People keep using merrill as the example of a good mage even when she asked a demon for help i mean the demon would help her out of the goodness of his heart he in no way planned to use this suckers body to make himself all powerful and kill everything that got in his way and that would've been her clan because that's the first thing he would've come across.


Audacity was sundered from the Fade and trapped in a totem by ancient magic. And how exactly was Audacity planning on possessing Merrill when he was trapped in a totem, and had been trapped for centuries? Since Merrill explicitly says she has no intention of releasing Audacity, I don't see how she would have become possessed. Marethari becomes possessed because she intentionally let Audacity loose, because she had another assumption that she pulled from thin air.

Cantina wrote...

Merrill (IMO ) is no way in hell a good mage. She made have had good intentions but going as far as she did reclaim old glory is just plain ignorance on her part. She did more damage to her clan then saving them. That sweet innocent act is just a cover up for how pathetic she really is.


It wasn't ignorant to try to restore ancient elven technology that might have been able to fundamentally improve the lives of elves across Thedas. Also, it isn't Merrill's fault that Marethari let Audacity loose, nor is it her fault that the clan can attempt to murder Hawke and Merrill in cold blood.

#27
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages
Just to play devil's advocate, couldn't the templars make a case that the threat of demonic possession is reason enough to contain apostate mages?

Modifié par Youth4Ever, 06 octobre 2012 - 05:03 .


#28
WhiteKnyght

WhiteKnyght
  • Members
  • 3 755 messages

Sibu wrote...

Irrelevant, Mages need to be constantly supervised.

Mages can destroy city blocks, control the mind of your entire family, summon demons that will betray your cause, experiment on your family because they are too afraid of death, even childrens with the power of magic will become puppets of a diabolical force that will turn your village into a zombie apocalypse scenario.

Mages want to be free? Fine, but that freedom better have a high price


Supvervision is one thing, imprisonment is another. Templars could be stationed around street corners and near mages' homes to make sure they don't use blood magic. Locking them in a cell and stealing their children, and then saying that they're working for the Maker is just a damned lie to justify depriving them of basic human rights, is monstrous.

Their own religon says the Maker abandoned them, the whole "When the Chant of Light is sung from the four corners of the world, the Maker will return" thing is a fabrication used to indoctrinate people into their prejudicial beliefs.

If the mages weren't treated like criminals when they've done nothing wrong, they wouldn't need to resort to blood magic.

Also armies can destroy city blocks, blackmail or fear can control your entire family, demons can still enter the world and make deals with non-mages,  corrupt men can torture your family because it gives them jollies, and coin can make anyone puppets of a diabolical force. Almost every crime you say mages can do can be committed by normal people, just through different means.

Look at Meredith. She's not a mage, but that red lyrium made her a genocidal psychopath. Where was the maleficarium there? That was entirely her fault.

Modifié par The Grey Nayr, 06 octobre 2012 - 05:17 .


#29
Huntress

Huntress
  • Members
  • 2 464 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

Just to play devil's advocate, couldn't the templars make a case that the threat of demonic possession is reason enough to contain apostate mages?


And yet not all apostates mages succumb to a demon, and to prove it I'll mention Morrigan who tell the Warden that there are people who protect Magic else were. Anyway 90% of  all knows  possessions occur within the walls of  Circle of magi. To me this is a sign that templars are not the "shield to the people" as they presume to be, they are nothing but an arm  of the followers of Andrastian tyranny and a good  target practice.Image IPB

#30
WhiteKnyght

WhiteKnyght
  • Members
  • 3 755 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

Just to play devil's advocate, couldn't the templars make a case that the threat of demonic possession is reason enough to contain apostate mages?


And in Act I, have of the Templar recruits are possibly possessed by demons as well.

Tahrone may have been a mage, but a demon in physical form could have done the same thing, by Cullen's own words.

Also Repentance in Act II showed that you don't have to be a mage to make a deal with a demon and become possessed. Lady Harimann found a demon in the ruins beneath her home and you know how that turned out.

Matter of fact, when you fight Lady Harriman, she uses blood magic even though she was stated to believe she couldn't be ifluenced because she wasn't a mage. So what does that mean? Simple, it means you don't have to be a mage to perform blood magic. Everybody has blood and it all has power. You just have to learn how to bring it out.
  • Ryriena aime ceci

#31
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages

Huntress wrote...

Youth4Ever wrote...

Just to play devil's advocate, couldn't the templars make a case that the threat of demonic possession is reason enough to contain apostate mages?


And yet not all apostates mages succumb to a demon, and to prove it I'll mention Morrigan who tell the Warden that there are people who protect Magic else were. Anyway 90% of  all knows  possessions occur within the walls of  Circle of magi. To me this is a sign that templars are not the "shield to the people" as they presume to be, they are nothing but an arm  of the followers of Andrastian tyranny and a good  target practice.Image IPB


But couldn't the templars argue that ninety percent of possessions occur in circles because the templars stay vigilant? Few mages exist outside the circles of magi to be such a threat.

#32
WhiteKnyght

WhiteKnyght
  • Members
  • 3 755 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

Huntress wrote...

Youth4Ever wrote...

Just to play devil's advocate, couldn't the templars make a case that the threat of demonic possession is reason enough to contain apostate mages?


And yet not all apostates mages succumb to a demon, and to prove it I'll mention Morrigan who tell the Warden that there are people who protect Magic else were. Anyway 90% of  all knows  possessions occur within the walls of  Circle of magi. To me this is a sign that templars are not the "shield to the people" as they presume to be, they are nothing but an arm  of the followers of Andrastian tyranny and a good  target practice.Image IPB


But couldn't the templars argue that ninety percent of possessions occur in circles because the templars stay vigilant? Few mages exist outside the circles of magi to be such a threat.


The ones that do happen in the Circle happen because the Templar's provoke it.

A mage with a weak will is easy prey for a demon. The tempalrs try to use intimidation and fear to break the wills of mages and keep them from escaping. That. by definition, makes them more vulnerable to possession.

Other mages also turn to blood magic just because they want to be free of the templars. If you strip away the freedom and dignity of any person, they'll resort to whatever is at their disposal under duress. Punishing mages simply because their just like everyone else is ridiculously hypocritical.

Plenty of non-mages love the benefits of magic, blood magic, and demons more the mages do. So maybe the Templars should lock them up too.

#33
WhiteKnyght

WhiteKnyght
  • Members
  • 3 755 messages
At any rate, the central focus of this topic is that the Templars are hypocrites. The very act of claiming to be enacting their god's will, when his other doctrines contradict their practices makes it so.

Simply put, they're hiding their own fear, hate, and prejudice behind perverted scriptures.

#34
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages

The Grey Nayr wrote...

And in Act I, have of the Templar recruits are possibly possessed by demons as well.

Tahrone may have been a mage, but a demon in physical form could have done the same thing, by Cullen's own words.


That was an unusual situation. Templars don't attract demons like mages.

Also Repentance in Act II showed that you don't have to be a mage to make a deal with a demon and become possessed. Lady Harimann found a demon in the ruins beneath her home and you know how that turned out.

Matter of fact, when you fight Lady Harriman, she uses blood magic even though she was stated to believe she couldn't be ifluenced because she wasn't a mage. So what does that mean? Simple, it means you don't have to be a mage to perform blood magic. Everybody has blood and it all has power. You just have to learn how to bring it out.


But I'm not talking about those that seek out demons. I'm talking about demons that seek mages becaue they are attracted to their power. I think most cases of possession are a result of the latter and not the former and where the chantry and templars can make their best case for circles.

Modifié par Youth4Ever, 06 octobre 2012 - 06:00 .


#35
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages

The Grey Nayr wrote...

The ones that do happen in the Circle happen because the Templar's provoke it.

A mage with a weak will is easy prey for a demon. The tempalrs try to use intimidation and fear to break the wills of mages and keep them from escaping. That, by definition, makes them more vulnerable to possession.


But isn't that why the templars enforce the Harrowing? Apprentices must have strong will to become full mages of Circles. The mages of weak will are identified and destroyed before they can become a threat. Is posession not the fault of a mage after he has gained full membership? After encouraging years of training, acclimation to the circle's rules, and a successful completion of a harrowing haven't the templars done everything they can to prevent a mage from later becoming an abomination?

Other mages also turn to blood magic just because they want to be free of the templars. If you strip away the freedom and dignity of any person, they'll resort to whatever is at their disposal under duress. Punishing mages simply because their just like everyone else is ridiculously hypocritical.

Plenty of non-mages love the benefits of magic, blood magic, and demons more the mages do. So maybe the Templars should lock them up too.


But not eveyone will become an abomination under stress. And absolutely non-mage consorters of demons should be imprisoned.

#36
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

Just to play devil's advocate, couldn't the templars make a case that the threat of demonic possession is reason enough to contain apostate mages?


There are many arguments made for both sides, but the Chantry controlled Circles lead to a continential revolution because mages sought their independence from a system that has been condemned by some as slavery.

#37
Laura Jean

Laura Jean
  • Members
  • 38 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

The Grey Nayr wrote...

The ones that do happen in the Circle happen because the Templar's provoke it.

A mage with a weak will is easy prey for a demon. The tempalrs try to use intimidation and fear to break the wills of mages and keep them from escaping. That, by definition, makes them more vulnerable to possession.


But isn't that why the templars enforce the Harrowing? Apprentices must have strong will to become full mages of Circles. The mages of weak will are identified and destroyed before they can become a threat. Is posession not the fault of a mage after he has gained full membership? After encouraging years of training, acclimation to the circle's rules, and a successful completion of a harrowing haven't the templars done everything they can to prevent a mage from later becoming an abomination?

Other mages also turn to blood magic just because they want to be free of the templars. If you strip away the freedom and dignity of any person, they'll resort to whatever is at their disposal under duress. Punishing mages simply because their just like everyone else is ridiculously hypocritical.

Plenty of non-mages love the benefits of magic, blood magic, and demons more the mages do. So maybe the Templars should lock them up too.


But not eveyone will become an abomination under stress. And absolutely non-mage consorters of demons should be imprisoned.


the harrowing tests an apprentice ability to resist demons and explore the fade. this should prevent them from becomming abomination under stress like Olivia, Ser Thresk's daughter.

any mage can study blood magic if they decide to make a deal with a demon. remember connor's desire demon from origins. also Anders states you have to look a demon in the eye and make a deal for blood magic. as mages can enter the fade in an awaken state it would be easy to seek out a demon and make that deal.

i will also point out if you follow the enigma of Kirkwall text towards the end in act 3 it is points out that the veil is very thin and the mages of Tinvinter have been practicing  blood magic for century, so the veil is thin so thin that demons can find non-mage to make deals with. 

#38
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages
I'll read this thread in the morning/afternoon, but for now I'd like to say that maleficar is a Tevinter word that translates to "one who is depraved". So while it's often used in regards to blood mages, it doesn't have an exclusive meaning for blood mages.

#39
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Youth4Ever wrote...

Just to play devil's advocate, couldn't the templars make a case that the threat of demonic possession is reason enough to contain apostate mages?


There are many arguments made for both sides, but the Chantry controlled Circles lead to a continential revolution because mages sought their independence from a system that has been condemned by some as slavery.


But that was only by one vote. I think that helps the cause of the templars and chantry. Not every mage wanted to leave the circles and fight.

#40
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

But that was only by one vote.


Yet all the Circles broke free from the Chantry, not simply the mages who were assembled with Fiona. Wynne pointed out to The Warden that there was a strong possibility that the Circles would break free years prior to Asunder. Rebellions have transpired for centuries, from Aldenon the Wise and his rebel mages fighting against an institution he condemned as slavery to the rebellion at the Circle of Ferelden.

Youth4Ever wrote...

I think that helps the cause of the templars and the chantry.


By refusing to submit to servitude? I disagree. As The Warden can point out to Wynne, if the mages don't fight for their freedom, they will never be free.

Youth4Ever wrote...

Not every mage wanted to leave the circles and fight.


But enough did to cause a continental rebellion, and ignite a war between mages and templars across the continent.

#41
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Yet all the Circles broke free from the Chantry, not simply the mages who were assembled with Fiona. Wynne pointed out to The Warden that there was a strong possibility that the Circles would break free years prior to Asunder. Rebellions have transpired for centuries, from Aldenon the Wise and his rebel mages fighting against an institution he condemned as slavery to the rebellion at the Circle of Ferelden.

But I think it is significant that the decision to leave the circles wasn't a decisive one. And allowing half the mage population to break from the Chantry would have caused severe repercussions for the mages who decided to stay. "We must all hang together or assuredly we will all hang separately."  The Circle Separatists forced that pressure on all mages.

By refusing to submit to servitude? I disagree. As The Warden can point out to Wynne, if the mages don't fight for their freedom, they will never be free.

It singles out the Separatists as unreasonable extremists that must be dealt with. There is no one else in Thedas pushing for mage independence in this way.

But enough did to cause a continental rebellion, and ignite a war between mages and templars across the continent.

And many mages will lose their lives because of this war and never see freedom.

Modifié par Youth4Ever, 09 octobre 2012 - 08:05 .


#42
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Yet all the Circles broke free from the Chantry, not simply the mages who were assembled with Fiona. Wynne pointed out to The Warden that there was a strong possibility that the Circles would break free years prior to Asunder. Rebellions have transpired for centuries, from Aldenon the Wise and his rebel mages fighting against an institution he condemned as slavery to the rebellion at the Circle of Ferelden.


But I think it is significant that the decision to leave the circles wasn't a decisive one. And allowing half the mage population to break from the Chantry would have caused severe repercussions for the mages who decided to stay. "We must all hang together or assuredly we will all hang seperately."  The Circle Separatists forced that pressure on all mages.


I don't see it that way; I think it was decisive. All the Circles across the Andrastian landscape broke free from the Chantry; it isn't as though the mages decided to ignore the vote and remain under subjugation to the Chantry of Andraste and the Order of Templars. Seperating from a system that has been condemned as slavery is, in my view, a very good thing. It's precisely what my Surana Warden asked for when he used his royal boon to ask for the Circle of Ferelden to be given its independence.

Youth4Ever wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

By refusing to submit to servitude? I disagree. As The Warden can point out to Wynne, if the mages don't fight for their freedom, they will never be free.


It singles out the Speraratists as unreasonable extremists that must be dealt with. There is no one else in Thedas pushing for mage independence in this way.


Because the mages don't want to live under oppression? Because they want to be free from a vile religious organization that vilifies them to the point where innocent people are murdered because of the dogma that the Chantry has established about magic and mages? The Chantry preached that templars "have dominion over mages by divine right." It was the right move for the mages to break free from the Chantry. Mages shouldn't live under the rule of the tyranny of the Chantry and its templars.

Youth4Ever wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

But enough did to cause a continental rebellion, and ignite a war between mages and templars across the continent.


And many mages will lose their lives because of this war and never see freedom.


People die in war. If the mages succeed, future generations can live in freedom instead of slavery.

#43
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

I don't see it that way; I think it was decisive. All the Circles across the Andrastian landscape broke free from the Chantry; it isn't as though the mages decided to ignore the vote and remain under subjugation to the Chantry of Andraste and the Order of Templars. Seperating from a system that has been condemned as slavery is, in my view, a very good thing. It's precisely what my Surana Warden asked for when he used his royal boon to ask for the Circle of Ferelden to be given its independence.

The Separatists would have made it near impossible for others to peacefully remain in the Circles of Magi. The known, unforseeable, and unintended consequences of roughly half the mage population leaving the Circles and fighting templars would profoundly (and likely negatively) impact the lives of the mages that stayed behind. That's not brotherhood. That's not standing together. That's not freedom. That's not choice. That's subjugation by another name. It's mages subjugating mages.

Because the mages don't want to live under oppression? Because they want to be free from a vile religious organization that vilifies them to the point where innocent people are murdered because of the dogma that the Chantry has established about magic and mages? The Chantry preached that templars "have dominion over mages by divine right." It was the right move for the mages to break free from the Chantry. Mages shouldn't live under the rule of the tyranny of the Chantry and its templars.

But I don't think you speak for all mages when you advocate war as the best or only option. The mages who want independance but do not want to war with the templars are not unreasonable. Those that don't want to be hunted, slaughtered, forced to use blood magic or consort with demons to survive. Those mages. I don't think they're a small group. The peaceful Libertarians, the Lucrosians, and the hesitant Aequitarians, for example.

People die in war. If the mages succeed, future generations can live in freedom instead of slavery.

Future generations and those living at the advent of the Mage-Templar War could benefit from another avenue to independence.

Modifié par Youth4Ever, 09 octobre 2012 - 05:32 .


#44
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

I don't see it that way; I think it was decisive. All the Circles across the Andrastian landscape broke free from the Chantry; it isn't as though the mages decided to ignore the vote and remain under subjugation to the Chantry of Andraste and the Order of Templars. Seperating from a system that has been condemned as slavery is, in my view, a very good thing. It's precisely what my Surana Warden asked for when he used his royal boon to ask for the Circle of Ferelden to be given its independence.


The Separatists would have made it near impossible for others to peacefully remain in the Circles of Magi. The known, unforseeable, and unintended consequences of roughly half the mage population leaving the Circles and fighting templars would profoundly (and likely negatively) impact the lives of the mages that stayed behind. That's not brotherhood. That's not standing together. That's not freedom. That's not choice. That's subjugation by another name. It's mages subjugating mages.


Mages aren't subjugating other mages by fighting for their autonomy. The mages are fighting for their right to live and love without being subjugated under the rule of an anti-mage religious organization that has vilified them, and forced them into servitude, for nearly a millennia.

Youth4Ever wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Because the mages don't want to live under oppression? Because they want to be free from a vile religious organization that vilifies them to the point where innocent people are murdered because of the dogma that the Chantry has established about magic and mages? The Chantry preached that templars "have dominion over mages by divine right." It was the right move for the mages to break free from the Chantry. Mages shouldn't live under the rule of the tyranny of the Chantry and its templars.


But I don't think you speak for all mages when you advocate war as the best or only option. The mages who want independance but do not want to war with the templars are not unreasonable. Those that don't want to be hunted, slaughtered, forced to use blood magic or consort with demons to survive. Those mages. I don't think they're a small group. The peaceful Libertarians, the Lucrosians, and the hesitant Aequitarians, for example.


In the City of Amaranthine, Wynne pointed out that the Chantry would rather kill all mages rather than see them free. The last time the mages peacefully protested their lack of rights, they were nearly killed in an Exalted March within the cathedral of Divine Ambrosia II. In a Circle Tower where mages can be killed, made tranquil, or sent to Aeonar, the only solution is to fight for their freedom. Like Bioware's Michael Hamilton said, what dictatorship has ever been overturned by asking politely?

Youth4Ever wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

People die in war. If the mages succeed, future generations can live in freedom instead of slavery.


Future generations and those living at the advent of the Mage-Templar War could benefit from another avenue to independence.


When the Chantry and the templars expect the mages to live on their knees for eternity, there is no other avenue to independence.

#45
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Mages aren't subjugating other mages by fighting for their autonomy. The mages are fighting for their right to live and love without being subjugated under the rule of an anti-mage religious organization that has vilified them, and forced them into servitude, for nearly a millennia.

Separatists are subjugating other mages when the terms of freedom fighting are dictated by their narrow and shaky majority. When they stake their cause on and gamble with the lives of those who don't want any involvement in their revolution.

In the City of Amaranthine, Wynne pointed out that the Chantry would rather kill all mages rather than see them free. The last time the mages peacefully protested their lack of rights, they were nearly killed in an Exalted March within the cathedral of Divine Ambrosia II. In a Circle Tower where mages can be killed, made tranquil, or sent to Aeonar, the only solution is to fight for their freedom. Like Bioware's Michael Hamilton said, what dictatorship has ever been overturned by asking politely?

Justinia V doesn't want to kill all mages so I can't give credence to what Wynne said in Amaranthine years before the events of Asunder. That's not accurate.

Successive approximations and the support of those in power will help the mages. War with every templar in Thedas will not.

When the Chantry and the templars expect the mages to live on their knees for eternity, there is no other avenue to independence.

Then why are there are so many diverse opinions on how to achieve independence among fraternities and within fraternities if war is the only way?

Modifié par Youth4Ever, 09 octobre 2012 - 08:01 .


#46
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

Justinia V doesn't want to kill all mages so I can't give credence to what Wynne said in Amaranthine years before the events of Asunder. That's not accurate.


But the majority of her Templars do. To the point that they contemplated and IIRC attempted to assassinate her in favor of someone more... amenable to their views.

Youth4Ever wrote...

Then why are there are so many diverse opinions on how to achieve independence among fraternities and within fraternities if war is the only way?


Those fraternities are groups that consist of people who argue over how they'd like to live, not how to achieve independence.

#47
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages
[quote]The Grey Nayr wrote...

1. Templar powers are magic too. It may be artifically endowed, but the power to dispel magic is magic nonetheless.[/quote]

Templar magic also isn't connected to the Fade, no risk of possession and isn't tied to any connection to other worlds. A Templar's abilities (lore-wise) works only on mages and cannot leave that school, they cannot learn to bend reality or summon demons.

[quote]2. Being a mage doesn't automatically make a person evil.[/quote]

But that's not what Templar think, they simply wish to defend ordinary people by managing the risk. Being a mage doesn't make one evil but it certainly gives them a lot of power and influence over them, including the ability to become possessed. 

It's not different than our ancestors managing plague victims, some were plagued and some were not but it didn't matter because the good of the many outweighed the few.
[quote]3. The Templars use their artificial magic to bully and persecute mages in a fashion that the above commandment in no way entails. Be imprisoned or die is not in the Chant of Light. Using the threat of their abilities to intimidate most mages into submission.[/quote]

When mages have supreme power over everyone, of course I'd mention that I can nullify magic to them and get them to comply with the Circle. The Circle of Magi was formed by mages to educate them, it serves exactly that purpose with Templar having a constant vigil to make sure none of them exploit their abilities. 

The Mages were allowed to vote whether or not they wanted to stay in the Circles or not, they complied with the Chantry to co-exist and they were supplied fully (food, clothing, beds, education). I'd say they got the better end of the deal.

Mages who proved they were capable were even allowed the ability of leaving the Circles provided they checked in, look at Finn / Ines / Wynne.

[quote]4. The Maker in no way selected or entitled these men and women in the Templars to do this. They elected themselves, and proclaim it to be the will of The Maker.[/quote]

The Chantry elected the Templar into the role after the Mages/Chantry created the Circles, it's their duty to the Chantry and by association, the Maker.

[quote]5. Templars condemn the use of blood magic as heresy. Yet use it themselves to keep mages collared.(Phylacteries)[/quote]

But the Templar who uses the phylacteries cannot summon demons, cannot control other's minds, cannot sacrifice others to empower themselves, cannot be possessed. They're a difference in both types of abilities, risk being the crucial part.

[quote]1. A person could be the best person or sweetest child you ever know. A person who never hurt anyone and lived their lives nicely. But one day, by sheer accident, they do the smallest thing to show signs of magical power. And the Templars will rush in and take this person against his or her will and drag them off to the nearest Circle Tower.[/quote]

Where they'll be fed, given a warm bed, allowed to never work a day of his life, given an education and allowed to live away free from public prosecution with their peers. Aside from the Templar and never leaving, they're practically nobility.

[quote]*snip* One could argue that these are isolated incidents--single or small groups of Templars who defy the rules but do not represent their faction as a whole. But when these incidents happen and come to light, there is no punishment at all for them. *snip*[/quote]

Aside from Alrik, there's been no abuse of tranquility. Grace and her gang were spared tranquility despite being blood mages, Feynriel was spared tranquility for the longest time despite being plagued by demons, Alan is not made tranquil despite being a blood mage and having Crazy Meredith in charge at the time.

The only case we've seen of tranquil abuse was Alrik and punishment couldn't have occured because he was dead by the time you found out, Meredith and Elthina both refused his plans to tranquil the mages.

[quote]3. Most mages have never committed a crime in their lives. Partly due to their confinement, but most mages seem content to study their craft and would just like to have basic human rights. Go to a market and buy nice clothes, have a decent meal, have a little privacy, get married, have children, see their families. But when something goes wrong somewhere, the Templars crack down on all those who were uninvolved. When their own doctrine says not to.[/quote]
  • Mages aren't content to study their craft until they're dragged to the Circle and given the abillity to.
  • Mages can purchase goods, there's an entire fraternity devoted to currency and it wouldn't exist if there was nothing to spend currency on.
  • Mages are supplied food, something which is a miracle considering the average Thedosian citizen starves and worries about things like shelter and disease.
  • They can get married provided the Chantry allows it. Marriage and Children are both worrisome for mages because they bring emotional ties which demons can exploit.
  • Mages can see their families. Connor, Rowan (if Connor died), Finn and other such cases.
[quote]So having magic, is not an offense or provocation. Yet the Templars see it as enough to make a person a 3rd class citizen.[/quote]

Having magic by nature is a provocation, it places you in a position of abuse and risk.

And there's no such thing as "3rd class citizen" when modern world human rights don't exist.

[quote]1. When the possibility of a cure for tranquiltiy came up. Lambert's first order to Evangeline was to murder Rhys, Wynne, Adrian, and Pharamond and cover up any trace of it. And there would have been a lie in place to justify why they did it.[/quote]

Note: Don't know Lambert's reasoning, giving my own.

Because curing tranquility is a stupid idea. Not only does it make Templar preventive measures useless, it makes the only source of income the Circle has nullified. How will the Circles provide food, shelter and education if they can't afford it. Money doesn't come from nowhere.

Hell, mages wouldn't want to cure tranquility either until the war is over as it'll likely be one of their main sources of income during the war effort.

[quote]2. When the First Enchanters were allowed to have a Conclave for the first time in over a year, with the permission of the Divine I might add, Lambert's response was to falsely accuse them of treason and arrest them, the ensuing battle causing the deaths of several innocent mages. The thing was, the only reason the Templars were allowed to keep mages under surveillance was because the Circle of Magi originally allowed it. There was nothing preventing them from splitting up when they decided to. Lambert's actions were clearly corrupt.[/quote]

1. The meeting was held behind Lambert's back, the Divine gave permission but not public acknowledgement. She showed mage sympathies and tried to distract Lambert while the meeting was going on, of course I'd assume something was going on.

2. Lambert wanted the conclave to stop, it only escalated because he wanted to arrest Rhys with evidence that he murdered Pharamond. Of course it was planted there by Adrian but it doesn't stop it being evidence, Wynne's refusal and the Enchanters fighting escalated the already high tension between both groups.

[quote]1. By imprisoning mages, Templars are robbing them of otherwise normal existences.[/quote]

Mages are by nature not normal, they cannot be treated like normal people.

[quote]2. If a mage gives birth, the Templars steal their children and they usually never see them again.[/quote]

I've given the reason why before but it's not like the child has a poor life, they're raised by the Chantry until magic potential is discovered and they're sent to the Circle of they're allowed to do whatever they please if no potential is shown (though they most likely join the Chantry).

[quote]3. On top of their persecution and condemnation of magic, the Chantry and Templars make a lot of money off of the goods mages produce. Enchanted weapons and armor, potions, and whatnot. It's almost like one of their biggest reasons is free labor to produce what makes them a lot of coin. Money that would rightfully belong to the mage who crafted said items.[/quote]

Mages who produce the goods keep their money, Lucrosians exist for this purpose.
Tranquil who remain in the Circle (they're allowed to leave if they want to) don't, as it's what supplies the Circle in the first place.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 09 octobre 2012 - 11:13 .


#48
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

Dave of Canada wrote...

Grace and her gang were spared tranquility despite being blood mages


Actually, 3 of the Mages of that group were made Tranquil, picked at random. Though I can't recall if that's true for the pro-Templar path on Act of Mercy or if it's only true for when they were caught years later.

Dave of Canada wrote...

Mages who proved they were capable were even allowed the ability of leaving the Circles provided they checked in, look at Finn


There's some evidence to suggest that he's the child of a fairly wealthy -- if not outright rich -- person. And money buys some Mages rights the rest of them don't get, Tevinter or no.

Wynne is a fair point, as is Ines.

Dave of Canada wrote...

Not only does it make Templar preventive measures useless, it makes the only source of income the Circle has nullified


Well, let's look at it from another perspective. We know that Alrik was illegally making Mages Tranquil. Shouldn't they be granted their minds back?

What if a Mage is made Tranquil for a crime they didn't commit? Shouldn't they be granted their minds back?

It's only a stupid idea if used in excess. But with proper oversight -- and ideally, refinement to not neuter a Mage's mind -- it's not a bad idea.

#49
lil yonce

lil yonce
  • Members
  • 2 319 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

But the majority of her Templars do. To the point that they contemplated and IIRC attempted to assassinate her in favor of someone more... amenable to their views.

Her Seekers do not. The Inquisition does not. And the templars are no longer part of the Chantry. The Divine preached to Orlesian nobles about the plight of mages. She sought an alternative to tranquility. She sent Wynne to protect that research. To say that the Chantry itself wants to slaughter every mage in Thedas is wrong. That is not their stance.

Those fraternities are groups that consist of people who argue over how they'd like to live, not how to achieve independence.

So the Lucrosian philosophy of complete integration into the economy, the accumulation of wealth, and eventual political influence won't help the mages achieve peaceful independence and the "by any means necessary" approach to separation from the Chantry of the extreme Libertarians has nothing to do with the Mages leaving the Circles and fighting templars?

Their approach to life directly impacts how they try to gain autonomy.

Modifié par Youth4Ever, 10 octobre 2012 - 05:01 .


#50
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Mages aren't subjugating other mages by fighting for their autonomy. The mages are fighting for their right to live and love without being subjugated under the rule of an anti-mage religious organization that has vilified them, and forced them into servitude, for nearly a millennia.


Separatists are subjugating other mages when the terms of freedom fighting are dictated by their narrow and shaky majority. When they stake their cause on and gamble with the lives of those who don't want any involvement in their revolution.


All mages shouldn't suffer simply because some mages accept slavery under the Chantry and the Order of Templars. Some people believe it's better to die on their feet than live on their knees.

Youth4Ever wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

In the City of Amaranthine, Wynne pointed out that the Chantry would rather kill all mages rather than see them free. The last time the mages peacefully protested their lack of rights, they were nearly killed in an Exalted March within the cathedral of Divine Ambrosia II. In a Circle Tower where mages can be killed, made tranquil, or sent to Aeonar, the only solution is to fight for their freedom. Like Bioware's Michael Hamilton said, what dictatorship has ever been overturned by asking politely? 


Justinia V doesn't want to kill all mages so I can't give credence to what Wynne said in Amaranthine years before the events of Asunder. That's not accurate.

Successive approximations and the support of those in power will help the mages. War with every templar in Thedas will not.


With your line of thinking, perhaps Andraste and Shartan should have written the Imperium strongly worded letters, instead of fighting for the freedom of their people.

Youth4Ever wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

When the Chantry and the templars expect the mages to live on their knees for eternity, there is no other avenue to independence.


Then why are there are so many diverse opinions on how to achieve independence among fraternities and within fraternities if war is the only way?


The same reason some slaves didn't have a problem with slavery; not everyone has the same opinion. That doesn't mean that forcing mages into servitude to the Chantry is right.