578 réponses à ce sujet

[Tiskenburdle]

Man, I thought I was Graphics-spoiled.. I fired up the original Icewind Dale - without graphics updating expansion before Dragon Age came out... I was having some trouble dealing with the 640x480 graphics for about 8 hours.. Then I got used to it, and started having fun again... I might very well have some trouble going back to the Gold Box games, but this game is beautiful.. Maybe it doesn't have the most advanced graphics on the market, but I certainly wouldn't call them subpar by any stretch of the imagination. I'm blown away there are people who consider this game to be graphically hideous.



Finally to the poster a few above me.. You can get yourself a decent graphics card for $50. If you play computer games, you need a decent graphics card and they're not all that expensive.

[NewYears1978]

gediv wrote...

Just finished the Wilds.   So far the graphics smell like feet and cigarettes.  

I'm a sucker for rpgs so I shall soldier on regardless and most likely enjoy the game.   Ah, what could have been though....  sigh.

Yeah..sadly the graphics are the only thing holding the game back.  Still terrific and I am quite enjoying it..but the texture errors really detract from things...  at least if those messed up textuers would be fixed Id deal with the rest of the graphical flaws..

[NewYears1978]

gediv wrote...

Just finished the Wilds.   So far the graphics smell like feet and cigarettes.  

I'm a sucker for rpgs so I shall soldier on regardless and most likely enjoy the game.   Ah, what could have been though....  sigh.

Yeah..sadly the graphics are the only thing holding the game back.  Still terrific and I am quite enjoying it..but the texture errors really detract from things...  at least if those messed up textuers would be fixed Id deal with the rest of the graphical flaws..

[Terwox_]

I find this whole thread utterly amusing. I'm running this game at max video settings smoothly and the game looks just fine. Granted its not "Crysis fine" but its still good. I have seen loads off pictures from people who's have problem with textures not loading properly, but that's a whole different hairball.



Bottom line is, the graphics off this game is good. And that's all there is too it. That some people don't want to call anything other than Crysis level off graphics or above for good, and anything less for crap. Well, that is up to you. Just don't expect to be taken serious.

[JaYKay_01]

I'm suprised by the comments too. I bought a new graphics card for the game especailly, just a Sapphire VAPOR-X HD 4890, but I've got it running at 1920 x 1200 and everything on max and it looks excellent, not mind blowing, but impressive and very smooth, I've seen no texture glitches either like people are mentioning.

[accessd]

Running 2x4890 in Crossfire with everything on max.



The graphic in DA is actually decent (good details and animations) even if its not comparable with modern 1st person shooters.



Anyone remember when Neverwinter Nights 2 got launced? Poor framerate and screwed up cameracontrol.

[syklonis01]

JayKay...You need to show proof you don't have these same texture issues with screen shots...Or you're being like everyone else who replies to this thread with worthless comments. If you read the thread you would know none of us are saying it looks bad at all. I run it maxed myself ...



It became a thread to show that texture loading issues were present. In which the developer noted this...

[JaYKay_01]

syklonis01 wrote...

JayKay...You need to show proof you don't have these same texture issues with screen shots...Or you're being like everyone else who replies to this thread with worthless comments. If you read the thread you would know none of us are saying it looks bad at all. I run it maxed myself ...

It became a thread to show that texture loading issues were present. In which the developer noted this...

You can see my screenshots under my profile, they all look pretty flawless to me....

[rp2009]

They arent the best ever, but graphics at least on PC are ok.

[Mordaedil]

[syklonis01]

Sorry Jaykay, like I mentioned..We are looking for texture loading issues. Screenshots taken by the game are not showing what we're talking about, especially since they look like crap under profiles. (downgraded for web use)



If you have no texture issues that are mentioned in this thread, then please post screens showing this. So we then can let the developer know it's working for some. But I am still waiting for ANYONE to prove otherwise!

[GreenSoda]

Graphics are fine -good even. They work well for the setting.

...the only thing that bothers me slightly are the overly low-res textures on some objects (wardrobes, carts, etc..). I kinda hope there's going to be a fix for this, but I'm not holding my breath. (Anyone remember ME-PC ? some NPCs had awful low-res clothing/armor...just like in the console versions...never got fixed)

Anyhow, graphics are fine.

Modifié par GreenSoda, 09 novembre 2009 - 11:28 .

[Embrosil]

Yup, the low textures are terrible. I see a nice scenery and then it is interrupted by a really low res textured cart :-(

[Seraosha]

The graphics are looking lovely to me. But if people really want higher textures, surely someone is beavering away on something a la The Witcher Texturen mod?

[WildstarGoethe]

Seraosha wrote...

The graphics are looking lovely to me. But if people really want higher textures, surely someone is beavering away on something a la The Witcher Texturen mod?

I'm sure someone is making a graphics texture pack as we speak. There's already a hi-res texture pack for Risen, and that was released only a month or so ago. Drakensang also had a hi-res texture pack released not long after the game came out. Personally, I think DA looks just fine, but there's nothing wrong with pushing the limits of what our pcs are capable of doing.

I like the game as it is, but if someone makes some hi-res textures for some of the background stuff, I'm not going to lie...I'll gladly install it and thank the provider.

[Bryaugh1]

Nassou wrote...

what are you talking about? The graphics are fine on PC. Maybe you're doing it wrong.

I don't buy many games these days - I still play Warcraft 3 and quit World of Warcraft about 6 months ago - so to me, Dragon Age visuals are pretty spectacular

[Mordaedil]

syklonis01 wrote...

Sorry Jaykay, like I mentioned..We are looking for texture loading issues. Screenshots taken by the game are not showing what we're talking about, especially since they look like crap under profiles. (downgraded for web use)

If you have no texture issues that are mentioned in this thread, then please post screens showing this. So we then can let the developer know it's working for some. But I am still waiting for ANYONE to prove otherwise!

I'm starting to think making an entirely different topic on the issue is what we're going to have to do to avoid these kinds of replies. It's starting to get pretty annoying, honestly, and I think the game looks great.

I still encounter these textures in places however and I'll be doing my damned best to help the developers fix it.

WildstarGoethe wrote...

I'm sure someone is making a
graphics texture pack as we speak. There's already a hi-res texture
pack for Risen, and that was released only a month or so ago.
Drakensang also had a hi-res texture pack released not long after the
game came out. Personally, I think DA looks just fine, but there's
nothing wrong with pushing the limits of what our pcs are capable of
doing.

I like the game as it is, but if someone makes some
hi-res textures for some of the background stuff, I'm not going to
lie...I'll gladly install it and thank the provider. [smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/smile.png[/smilie]

Well, making hi res graphics texture packages isn't exactly magic; it doesn't happen by itself. We're going to need to help the developers find where these textures are off, so there are more than a few ways to help:

A) What installation do you have, Steam, other digital distributor or DVD?
Do you get low-res textures in places other people have them?
C) Post pictures of other low-resolution objects that other people have not posted.
D) Let us know if an object that has been posted a picture of is NOT a problem for you in terms of textures.

I'd suggest someone make a new thread for this though. If it happens, then maybe the developers can provide it in a patch that is relatively small as opposed to a large community made package.

[Luxus]

Nothing new in this department lately? Or have you all jumped to a different thread?

[syklonis01]

Nothing new really, it's a known issue that low textures are loading in place of some hi-res textures. According to a developer, they must have been packed wrong. Will we get a fix, probably not, as it's a small issue. Hopefully the mod community can correct the issue. If I knew in the 3000 plus textures where the wagon tex was located I'd correct it myself..along with the other low res blobs

[Ashiyawolf]

I am putting my money where my mouth is, and posting screenshots from my Xbox 360. Despite the issues with the PC version, I only wish we had those problems. Once you see the Viking Ship, you'll understand what I mean I think. Also, we cannot get texture packs from independent sources, so we are reliant on Bioware to fix these issues.

Dragon Age Origins Screenshots

Screenshots include:
1. Examples of DAO bad textures, or not mapping correctly.
2. Example of Kameo, made in 2005 when the Xbox 360 released.
3. Examples of Mass Effect on 360.
4. Clipping issues in DAO.

Modifié par Ashiyawolf, 14 novembre 2009 - 07:29 .

[Kwonne]

Love the graphics.

[Madanial]

May be your expect too much, imo this game has really good graphic.

[Samthorian]

Mersonix wrote...
this game looks TERRIBLE.

I've been playing Crysis Warhead all day. I've probably spoiled myself.

That pretty much explains it. The game doesn't look bad it just that Crysis looks amazingly good and when you put them side by side you would think DA looks horrible because Crysis looks so good.

[dchalf10]

My complaint about it is not the texture levels etc, it's the absolute lazy outdoor environement design, a few sparse trees  etc. There needs to be more 'doodads' there is simply not enough. When entering the bracilian forest (after entering through the main villiage) there is like 7 bushes in a row on the right, all the same tree design, all facing the same way. Usually level desiners use a bit of auto-randomisation to change the orrientaion of objects, or even use different tree models.....apparently not in this game. When a 2009 game maxed out with 8aa looks worse than FFX in certain areas....there is something wrong. I totally get the gameplay over graphics......but the graphics are still below average, average would have been nice compared to this.

[Luxus]

dchalf10 wrote...

It's the absolute lazy outdoor environement design, a few sparse trees  etc. There needs to be more 'doodads' there is simply not enough. When entering the bracilian forest (after entering through the main villiage) there is like 7 bushes in a row on the right, all the same tree design, all facing the same way. Usually level desiners use a bit of auto-randomisation to change the orrientaion of objects, or even use different tree models.....apparently not in this game. When a 2009 game maxed out with 8aa looks worse than FFX in certain areas....there is something wrong. I totally get the gameplay over graphics......but the graphics are still below average, average would have been nice compared to this.

This.
+Complaint about the texture levels

Modifié par Luxus, 14 novembre 2009 - 07:53 .