578 réponses à ce sujet

[D_Thoran]

For my 2 coppers worth, the graphics look oretty good to me. No they are not the best graphics ever, but they are definitely not horrible or outdated like some are saying! I just don't see it? Maybe its your graphics card/mobo setup? Maybe you got a poop monitor? Who knows? I have a great 2gig nvidia card, 4 gigs system ram, matched nvidia mobo, and a 2 year old dual cpu and my game looks pretty dang good...

[velimirius]

ic,its better to play game with bad @ss graphics with tons of bugs then really good polished game with solid graphics.



some ppl just /fail.

[Big_Rich]

I'm sorry. I'm not being childish but that looks like poop for a 2009 AAA game. That is a 2meg unedited PNG.


That's at max textures 8xaa 16af(forced) Like they forgot to finish it?? Reminds me of everquest.

Modifié par Big_Rich, 04 novembre 2009 - 03:25 .

[leoleez]

I know what you mean, I hear all these people talking about the reason they buy games is because of graphics and it looks cool... well I'd rather have fun then have a game that takes up a big portion of my CPU and memory just to make the game look better.

Heck we should be grateful, we are not in the 16 bit age anymore, look how far we have come

[AcrylamideTic]

I'm just curious, all the people saying the game looks great/not bad, have you looked at the screenshots people have posted? Do you not see those same textures, or do you just think those textures look good or not bad?

I have yet to really hear anyone actually address the textures. Everyone just says we're all whiny babies who don't understand that graphics don't matter in RPGs. I'm still trying to figure out whether this is a bug or how the game is supposed to run.

I just want to know if you guys see the screenshots of the wagon or the column that was just posted and say, "That is exactly what it looks like in my game and I think it's beautiful, or at least not bad." Because obviously this is all subjective, I'm not sure we're all talking about the same thing.

Modifié par AcrylamideTic, 04 novembre 2009 - 03:38 .

[Drasill]

What I find funny is that this game uses BioWare's new proprietary engine whereas The Withcer uses BioWare's old proprietary engine and yet The Witcher looks much better. Why would they make their new engine have lesser visuals?

[Eidolonn]

LOL. This thread is pretty funny. IMHO, the graphics are pretty **** good. Are they cutting edge? No. But they are pretty **** beautiful.

[Zaknaberrnon]

AcrylamideTic wrote...

I'm just curious, all the people saying the game looks great/not bad, have you looked at the screenshots people have posted? Do you not see those same textures, or do you just think those textures look good or not bad?

I have yet to really hear anyone actually address the textures. Everyone just says we're all whiny babies who don't understand that graphics don't matter in RPGs. I'm still trying to figure out whether this is a bug or how the game is supposed to run.

It sounds more like a bug to me, that has to do with the hi-res textures not loading. I'm shure that it will be fixed in a future update, look how often updates came out for nwn I and II.

Still, I'm in Spain and don't have the game yet so I caan't be abolutely sure, but it does seem more like a bug than an actual issue with the game itself.

[Zaknaberrnon]

Modifié par Zaknaberrnon, 04 novembre 2009 - 03:36 .

[Zaknaberrnon]

sorry bout the double post forum acting up

[Syrellaris]

Am i the only one, who thinks cryis graphics are horrible? and warhead is the same. grey, dull and no visual greantess at all.

[Lowdos]

Same here, haven't played the game yet (Friday at the earliest) but from the look of some of these screenshots people have posted, its the fact that the character models look comepletely jarring against some of the (or lack of) background textures.



Unless this is a known issue / bug, then I suspect at somepoint in time the PC mod community might be able to make things looker sharper / more detailed.



Regardless, I'm still positive the game won't dissapoint me.

[AcrylamideTic]

Syrellaris wrote...

Am i the only one, who thinks cryis graphics are horrible? and warhead is the same. grey, dull and no visual greantess at all.

I actually whole heartedly agree with you. Every time someone says this isn't going to look like Crysis I cringe, because I think Crysis was terribly ugly. I got through the first one, but uninstalled Warhead after half an hour becausae the gameplay was so mundane and the promised graphical prestige just wasn't there. Admittedly this was on DX9 Gamer 1080p, so maybe enthusiast DX10 makes a world of difference, but...

[AcrylamideTic]

Lowdos wrote...


Regardless, I'm still positive the game won't dissapoint me.

It won't, it's a fantastic game and I'm loving every minute of it, even with the weird textures.

[Malautomedonte]

The lack of dynamic shadows (we're in 2009, c'mon...) is very disappointing. In addition, most of the textures are simply shameful... I could close an eye for shadows, but textures... Some of them are so ugly that sometimes I think I'm playing a 2k game...

****ED CONSOLES!!

[EricHVela]

If the demand is high enough, I'm sure BW/EA will consider a DLC upgrade to certain graphic aspects for those whose machines far surpass the current stress of the graphics (and has enough space). (No stress on my home computer and it's not top-of-the-line no more by a few years, so I might consider it since I've still got tons of space.)

Consider asking for a DLC graphic upgrade. Maybe for a small number of points even if not free.

[Malautomedonte]

Syrellaris wrote...

Am i the only one, who thinks cryis graphics are horrible? and warhead is the same. grey, dull and no visual greantess at all.

Mmh... I think you should use eyeglasses... Yes, yes....

[Malautomedonte]

I hope so... And I want it for free!

[Templ]

Umm, you can go ahead and take screenshots of blocky textures all day long for all I care. In the meantime, I'll be enjoying the game.  :innocent:

[devil_foetus]

The graphics are disappointing, but I'm sure for many it wont detract from the enjoyment of playing the game.

[TheRealIncarnal]

Maybe I'm just enjoying the game too much, but I really haven't run into any terrible textures like the ones posted in the screenshots.

[Malautomedonte]

@alex: The game is very good but I was hoping that Bioware would have spent some more time on improving graphics, or at least textures... In RPG's this is not essentials, but, be honest, NWN 2 looks better than DAO...

Modifié par Malautomedonte, 04 novembre 2009 - 03:57 .

[Scimal]

Big_Rich wrote...





I'm sorry. I'm not being childish but that looks like poop for a 2009 AAA game. That is a 2meg unedited PNG.


That's at max textures 8xaa 16af(forced) Like they forgot to finish it?? Reminds me of everquest.

Your memory sucks.

www.gamingcrusade.com/images/EverQuest.jpg


If you want the latest hardware-pushing graphics, go for the Annual games that EA pushes out on a yearly basis. Sure, they may only be 5 hours long, the gameplay maybe 99% the same as last year's edition, but at least this time the Shifter-knob inside your car's cabin has a realistic leather look!

The truth is, there are only so many resources. You can either spend 80% of them on a cutting-edge graphics engine, or you can use one that's not super-ultra-high-mega-quality (that only the latest Quad-SLI GeForce GTXX1000's can actually display at high resolutions with a decent framerate) and pump up the ENTIRE REST OF THE GAME.

I'm glad BioWare chose the latter.

[s2k4life]

About to go buy the game, and after reading what u all have said, i got hesitant for a moment, but i agree with some, why does it have to be all about graphics? huh huh? enjoy the story line, ppl still play older games, where graphics arent that great, why do they play u ask? well CUZ THE STORY LINE ROCKS. NOW ENJOY THE FRACKIN GAME

[AcrylamideTic]

SpaceAlex wrote...

Umm, you can go ahead and take screenshots of blocky textures all day long for all I care. In the meantime, I'll be enjoying the game.  :innocent:

But you're not, you are reading the forums...