FemaleMageFan wrote...
I think it is neccesary too! I like mages but for everyone mage there is also a crazy bloodmage. The onoly viable option would be to deplete their numbers before something terrible comes about. There is a complication with that, with all the mages you opress there are other mages who will rebel stronger. The templars will get matry's, extremists<spoielr>anders</spoiler> and my end philosophy says this to them. There will never be complete peace before the mages and temokars and a sad reality is one group would have to be eliminated. The beliefs both groups support are just too much of opposite extremesGeneral User wrote...
That seems more or less like the concept behind the Rite of Annulment in the Circles. Keep all the mages in one place so if something goes catastrophically wrong, it can be handled with minimum danger to the public.FemaleMageFan wrote...
My strategy would be to somehow direct them to one area then NUKE them.
Well the proportion isn't necessarily 1:1, but even if it were 20:1 or 100:1 the damage that a single blood mage causes is catastrophically high(Fereldan Circle for example).
I also happen to agree that it seems like the peaceful option no longer exists. Which means wiping out one group or the other. Simply having free mages doesn't work(Tevinter happens, since you only need one blood mage to be an emperor and its unlikely the entire population of mages will resist the temptation to abuse their power) so destroying the current generation of mages seems like the best solution to me. (*note I supported mages in DA;O, DA:A, and DA2, its just my pragmatism kicks in over any moralism here, can't justify keeping my hands/consience clean when it means more death/suffering than the alternative)





Retour en haut







