257 réponses à ce sujet

[SovereignX6]

You know they wont do it.

[DeadpoolBub]

I voted yes.

What I'd do is:

Keep all the goodbyes the same. The final goodbyes with the squad is one of the best parts of the game. The only thing here I'd change is the part with Captain Kirrahe. If you betrayed the Krogan while Wrex was the leader, you get an awesome speech from Kirrahe in place of Wrex; this speech should be found elsewhere in the "Goodbye base" so that everyone can here it, since most people either had Wreave or kept Wrex alive.

After the goodbye scene, you'd get an advanced version of the ending of ME2. What I mean by that is that you'll get to command the troops what to do & where to go. There'd be several objectives for the troops to complete, this will actually affect the gameplay. If the troops successfully complete their missions then Shepard & his crew will have less enemies to face; if the troops fail then more enemies will come at Shepard.

The outcomes of said missions would depend on your EMS. For instance, there'd be an objective that requires brute force. If you have high EMS you can send the Krogan, Turians & Rachni to complete that mission, resulting in it's success. If you have a low EMS however, you'd only have the Turians who would get decimated.

Previous & current squad mates will also be in the battle & can die if chosen for the wrong mission. For instance, if you tell Kasumi to go with the brute force team she could die on the battlefield. You'd also pick your current squad mates to lead several teams that will work with Shepard's squad. For instance, say I choose Garrus & Tali to accompany me to the final battle, I can then assign the rest of the current squad to lead two teams to fight in the same area as me. You'd hear their comm chatter often during the gameplay portions & you may even see them off in the distance fighting during gameplay.

During the course of the final battle, you'd see cutscenes of your war assets in action, either succeeding or failing miserably. The gameplay itself would play largely the same as to how it does, with one major exception: A final boss fight. There would be a final boss fight against Harbinger, which would either be a major success with Harbinger dying or a complete f***-up with Harbinger wiping out everyone. Then the ending would play out pretty much the same...there is the plot hole of why everyone doesn't go through the beam when Harbinger dies; but I'm too lazy to think of a reason, so...yeah.

Modifié par DeadpoolBub, 11 octobre 2012 - 02:59 .

[Dark_Caduceus]

I support a revamped Mass Effect 3.

[d1ta]

I Support.

I was kinda hoping we'd get to play SM with war assets and virmire like situation again with your squadies, including those who didn't get to join the Normandy in ME3 (Jacob, Jack, Miranda, Grunt, etc).
I think what makes Priority: Earth feels somewhat 'flat' is because the missions before (Ranoch and Tuchanka) are just several leagues above awsome, hands down. Especially Tuchanka, omg every part of it is just perfect. There is a moment where Shep faces a choice to betray the krogan (and a possible long time friend) to gain the help from the Salarians, there is that moment of triumph, sadness and heroic, all happening in that one mission.

Whereas on earth, aside from the good bye scene and Anderson's.. I really felt nothing from it. Blast my way through until I find that magic elevator. The end.

Edit:
@galland
I think this is what Sable Rhapsody meant, the ME3 Ending Mod: http://social.biowar.../index/14377750

A modder has succesfuly made some alterations to the endings. Although it may not be perfect (or you may still not like the changes he made) at least it's a step to the right direction in creating a more 'palatable' ending to those who are still not satisfied with the EC. I hope this helps.

--
Edit: again for typos and grammar. It's hard typing my way here using cellphone X_x'

Modifié par d1ta, 11 octobre 2012 - 12:18 .

[Maxster_]

Dark_Caduceus wrote...

I support a revamped Mass Effect 3.

That would be better. I support that too.

[CaIIisto]

Marauder Shields' heroic sacrifice was the best thing about Priority:Earth.

I do hope that any such revamp would not devalue his courageous efforts......

[brummyuk19]

Bester76 wrote...

Marauder Shields' heroic sacrifice was the best thing about Priority:Earth.

I do hope that any such revamp would not devalue his courageous efforts......

You never know, maybe they'll show more of him

[NM_Che56]

Anything that gives me more content in Mass Effect 3 pretty much gets my support automatically.

[LilLino]

I'd be fine if it was free. I'm not paying for fixing things they screwed up.

[string3r]

Yer know, Earth wouldn't have been so bad if the whole game wasn't building up to it.

[Blueprotoss]

I'm perfectly fine with Priority Earth just like how I am with Retaking the Citadel in ME1 and the Suicide Mission in ME2 since all 3 are a multi-layered final mission.

C9316 wrote...

I would've been all for a complete campaign on earth, where we hit the reapers on all sides and take back key locations, leading up to the charge on London.

The Reapers still have the better forces in a head to head battle and I'm pretty sure the Alliance isn't interested in turning Earth into a real wasteland.

fil009 wrote...

I'm more for realistic expansions of the mission not this troll stuff.

I would rather support this since its more rational and productive.

LilLino wrote...

I'd be fine if it was free. I'm not paying for fixing things they screwed up.

It sounds like you aren't interested in DLC unless its free.

Dark_Caduceus wrote...

I support a revamped Mass Effect 3.

This sounds like a bad idea just like how some people wanted to happen with ME1 and ME2.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 12 octobre 2012 - 04:22 .

[brummyuk19]

string3r wrote...

Yer know, Earth wouldn't have been so bad if the whole game wasn't building up to it.

Which is what happens isn't it, the whole series pointed towards this final mission, to take earth back... I don't know about you but it didn't feel like we took anything back. There is no sense of victory whatsoever.

[Blueprotoss]

brummyuk19 wrote...

string3r wrote...

Yer know, Earth wouldn't have been so bad if the whole game wasn't building up to it.

Which is what happens isn't it, the whole series pointed towards this final mission, to take earth back... I don't know about you but it didn't feel like we took anything back. There is no sense of victory whatsoever.

I'm pretty sure there wasn't a Game Over screen at the end of ME3 when it actually ended.

[mjh417]

YES YES YES

[brummyuk19]

Blueprotoss wrote...

brummyuk19 wrote...

string3r wrote...

Yer know, Earth wouldn't have been so bad if the whole game wasn't building up to it.

Which is what happens isn't it, the whole series pointed towards this final mission, to take earth back... I don't know about you but it didn't feel like we took anything back. There is no sense of victory whatsoever.

I'm pretty sure there wasn't a Game Over screen at the end of ME3 when it actually ended.

<_<

[Stalker]

Always support that!

How about updating the OP with some content from the old thread?

[sUiCiDeKiNgS13]

Adding more to Priority Earth would be awesome. Especially if we get to see all the war assets in action.

It's the final game of Shepard's trilogy, go out with a BANG!

[marcelo caldas]

No, I support a total revamp of ME3, pretend that never happend and do it again.
Everybody who ever posted here would buy.

[Blueprotoss]

caldas wrote...

No, I support a total revamp of ME3, pretend that never happend and do it again.
Everybody who ever posted here would buy.

I doubt that everyone would buy it and a revamp isn't neccessary unless if you decide to revamp the previous two installments because a ME3 revamp would contradict ME as whole.  Ironicaly more people would buy ME DLC as a whole then a revamp even when ME1 and ME2 are basically two different games just by looking at the gameplay.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 21 octobre 2012 - 04:50 .

[Blueprotoss]

brummyuk19 wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

brummyuk19 wrote...

string3r wrote...

Yer know, Earth wouldn't have been so bad if the whole game wasn't building up to it.

Which is what happens isn't it, the whole series pointed towards this final mission, to take earth back... I don't know about you but it didn't feel like we took anything back. There is no sense of victory whatsoever.

I'm pretty sure there wasn't a Game Over screen at the end of ME3 when it actually ended.

<_<

To be fair most games end either with credits or an epilogue scene after those credits, which is what ME3 did unlike ME1 and ME2.

[AresKeith]

Blueprotoss wrote...

brummyuk19 wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

brummyuk19 wrote...

string3r wrote...

Yer know, Earth wouldn't have been so bad if the whole game wasn't building up to it.

Which is what happens isn't it, the whole series pointed towards this final mission, to take earth back... I don't know about you but it didn't feel like we took anything back. There is no sense of victory whatsoever.

I'm pretty sure there wasn't a Game Over screen at the end of ME3 when it actually ended.

<_<

To be fair most games end either with credits or an epilogue scene after those credits, which is what ME3 did unlike ME1 and ME2.

Because ME1 and ME2 were leading into the next game

[3DandBeyond]

Blueprotoss wrote...

caldas wrote...

No, I support a total revamp of ME3, pretend that never happend and do it again.
Everybody who ever posted here would buy.

I doubt that everyone would buy it and a revamp isn't neccessary unless if you decide to revamp the previous two installments because a ME3 revamp would contradict ME as whole.  Ironicaly more people would buy ME DLC as a whole then a revamp even when ME1 and ME2 are basically two different games just by looking at the gameplay.

As opposed to the total contradiction of ME1 and 2, and whole parts of ME3 right now.  Heck, the kid contradicts himself when talking and ME3 contradicts Leviathan that contradicts a lot of ME as a whole.  Earth contradicts everything that mattered to the previous games.  Earth was never mentioned much at all in both games-humans were, but Earth not so much.  Saving the galaxy was.

ME3 should have tied up questions remaining from 1 and 2, not create new questions that they now create DLC for.  Leviathan was created to build up a story that explains the existence of the kid, and once you're done with it Shepard all but forgets that conversation with Leviathan.  ME3 is a mess and there's nothing that bears that out more than trying to retake Earth and getting to the discussion with the kid.

The whole idea of Shepard's teammates congregating at the FOB, then doing nothing, phoning friends, then Harbinger overseeing the Normandy evac and those FOB teammates mysteriously ending up back on the Normandy after doing nothing, as well as the whole catalyst conversation-those are some of the worst moments in gaming I've ever experienced.  High points are Liara's gift scene (except it would have been nice to have hint as to what the gift was), ending conversation dialogue with friends (even if contrived), TIM, the evac dialogue with LI, TIM, and refusal speech.  Great voice acting in other narration as well, but really sad it was used for this trash.

[ATLAS1192]

While I'm fine with the endings as they are, Priority: Earth left so much to be desired.

I support.

[Obadiah]

Just play multiplayer on the London map against Reapers. You can see all Shep's allies there.

Modifié par Obadiah, 21 octobre 2012 - 05:44 .