SOG TOUGH wrote...
It can be used on any assault rifle.
Doing so lowers your damage output against non-armor by 25% additive because it takes up the barrel slot. On the Falcon, Strike, Saber, and Argus, there is no reason to ever take this mod because it does nothing or is less valuable than the normal barrel in all cases. With the Harrier and Mattock, the difference between the two is very small -- 12.5 per hit, which is a max of less than 10% compared to the max bonus against everything else of 25%. That leaves the Avenger, Phaeston, Vindicator, GPR, Rev, CAR, and PPR. Of these, the Avenger, Phaeston, Vindicator, GPR, and CAR shouldn't be used at all because they suck chocolate salty balls. That leaves you with the ever-underwhelming Rev and the PPR. Even if it didn't cost you weight, it's meaningless on every other weapon. The weight penalty is just rotten icing on the excrement cake.
The only place you could justify using it is where you're using a Harrier or PPR with Incendiary Ammo for the fire explosions, but then it up and slows down your explosion rate, making it a devil's bargain there as well.
bolt460 wrote...
That's exactly my point. Even a gun that's less than stellar was doing a lot of damage against armored enemies. If you were to take these mods and apply them to something like the harrier, the damage would be even greater.
That's not how the system works at all. The HVB doesn't give a damage bonus at all, it just reduces the armor penalty. For the awful rapid-fire guns, their damage is very low per hit and is reduced by a proportionally-huge amount. However, even removing the penalty entirely results in a ceiling of the equal damage as is done to health and shields. That's why those guns will always be useless -- they still have poor damage against health and shields. However, when you look at something like the Harrier, the maximum damage reduction is 38.6% of the damage, and realistically much lower than that (for example, a total additive bonus of 60% would make the DPS difference sans any armor reduction at all a modest 24.1%). That is why you can directly compare using the normal, zero-weight EB to using the HVB and find the bonus for using the HVB against one type is less than the penalty against the 3 other types, making it a bad choice over the EB independent of any weight added by the HVB at all.
//EDIT: The AR HVB needs the weight penalty completely removed, and even then it's of dubious value except on the guns that are in desperate need of buffs already.
Modifié par Gamemako, 18 octobre 2012 - 10:58 .