Aller au contenu

Photo

What's the (Romantic) Appeal of Zevran?


35177 réponses à ce sujet

#29176
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages
I have a news flash -- everyone's sexuality is weird! It's just a very unique part of everyone. Even the most hetero of heteros usually have some weird kink, no matter how well they hide it. Whether it's enjoying wearing panties or a corset, whether it's enjoyment of the feel of a needle going through skin or a flail on the back, whether it's a guy who gets into his back being torn up with a woman's nails -- hell, EVERYONE has that something that conventional wisdom says is "wrong."

So screw convention.

Edit: I had a sinking feeling THIS would be a page topper.  No, I've no interesting new pictures or screenshots, so I'll go with my usual. :wub:  Dwarf kisses are always on topic for ME!

Image IPB

Modifié par ejoslin, 22 mai 2010 - 02:25 .


#29177
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages
So we shouldn't only do it man/woman after marriage in only the missionary position?



(that seems to be the most popular convention nowadays at least)



So many wasted years, *sigh*.

#29178
Cuddlezarro

Cuddlezarro
  • Members
  • 5 327 messages

Whether it's enjoying wearing panties or a corset, whether it's enjoyment of the feel of a needle going through skin or a flail on the back,




Pantyboys are a complete turn off for me :3



and Needles... well im scared sh*tless of them :3

#29179
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages

Cuddlezarro wrote...

Whether it's enjoying wearing panties or a corset, whether it's enjoyment of the feel of a needle going through skin or a flail on the back,


Pantyboys are a complete turn off for me :3

and Needles... well im scared sh*tless of them :3


*grin* I never meant to say that EVERYONE had those kinks, just that everyone has their own!  I agree about panty boys, but I've known a few who admitted it openly.  Back when I worked, I used to make a game out of trying to guess which men had panties on under their suits.

Edit:

Herr Uhl wrote...

So we shouldn't only do it man/woman after marriage in only the missionary position?

(that seems to be the most popular convention nowadays at least)

So many wasted years, *sigh*.


Really, even those people have their secret kinks, the things that send them praying to be "released" from.  /shrug.  That's why I think if it's consenting adults, it's their business.

Modifié par ejoslin, 22 mai 2010 - 02:40 .


#29180
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages
Is there really that many pantyboys?

#29181
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages

Herr Uhl wrote...

Is there really that many pantyboys?


I doubt you'll ever get hard numbers, but yeh, my guess is there are quite a few.  

Modifié par ejoslin, 22 mai 2010 - 02:42 .


#29182
Verly

Verly
  • Members
  • 1 048 messages
I've known about this site for years now. ( I was on a female message board and when a guy would join we would razz him about buying a pair to fit in more)



http://www.manties.net/

#29183
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages

Verly wrote...

I've known about this site for years now. ( I was on a female message board and when a guy would join we would razz him about buying a pair to fit in more)

http://www.manties.net/


Those are the cutest, frilliest panties I've ever seen!  But the briefs look like boxers with a lace trim.  I wish they had modeled the high cut ones instead.

#29184
RPGmom28

RPGmom28
  • Members
  • 1 466 messages
Thought I'd put this up here since it was something I was fiddling with a while back and didn't want to go to waste.  Just a bit of silliness from a screenie turned into a sig button.

Image IPB

#29185
Guest_Elps_*

Guest_Elps_*
  • Guests
Oh Maker! I pop in here to see what's happening now that Friday is over and things have moved on to kinks... and PANTIES????!!!




#29186
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages
That's Manties! God, that's my new favorite word.

#29187
Sannox

Sannox
  • Members
  • 1 163 messages
I agree that everybody (most, anyway) has their kinks. I imagine there's a good evolutionary reason for our sexuality being so complex. I suppose that sometimes I just feel stranger than most. Most of what I read or see about sex seems to have nothing to do with me.

I'm sure I'm not the only one to feel like that though, even if it's for different reasons.

I didn't know there was such a word as 'manties'. I don't think much of 'panties', but 'manties' is even worse. Whatever happened to good old 'knickers'?

#29188
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages

ejoslin wrote...

That's Manties! God, that's my new favorite word.


I wonder what womanly thing will get to start with an m next. Magina, Movaries, Mra, Mouchebag etc. the possibilities are endless!

#29189
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages

Sannox wrote...

I didn't know there was such a word as 'manties'. I don't think much of 'panties', but 'manties' is even worse. Whatever happened to good old 'knickers'?


What about unmentionables?

#29190
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages

Herr Uhl wrote...

ejoslin wrote...

That's Manties! God, that's my new favorite word.


I wonder what womanly thing will get to start with an m next. Magina, Movaries, Mra, Mouchebag etc. the possibilities are endless!


Mangina is NOT a new term...  But it probably doesn't mean quite what you think it would!

Edit: Hmmm, according to urban dictionary, the way I always used it is definition 7!  Hmmmmm.

Modifié par ejoslin, 22 mai 2010 - 04:27 .


#29191
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages

ejoslin wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

ejoslin wrote...

That's Manties! God, that's my new favorite word.


I wonder what womanly thing will get to start with an m next. Magina, Movaries, Mra, Mouchebag etc. the possibilities are endless!


Mangina is NOT a new term...  But it probably doesn't mean quite what you think it would!

Edit: Hmmm, according to urban dictionary, the way I always used it is definition 7!  Hmmmmm.


That is Mangina, not magina. There is a difference. And I know all about Manginas.

#29192
Guest_Elps_*

Guest_Elps_*
  • Guests

Sannox wrote...

I agree that everybody (most, anyway) has their kinks. I imagine there's a good evolutionary reason for our sexuality being so complex. I suppose that sometimes I just feel stranger than most. Most of what I read or see about sex seems to have nothing to do with me.
I'm sure I'm not the only one to feel like that though, even if it's for different reasons.
I didn't know there was such a word as 'manties'. I don't think much of 'panties', but 'manties' is even worse. Whatever happened to good old 'knickers'?


I think some folk just overthink things. Where it comes to sex and sexuality the word "normal" has only one meaning - its the cycle on a washing machine you use to wash the sheets. That is, if sheets are even involved. 
One person's idea of kink is another person's normal, everyday expression of their sexuality. When two (or more) people are on the same page and are old enough to give consent then anything they do together is right, proper, and normal.

Sorry for the rant - its just something that really gets to me. A bit like manties really - I can't see the need for a made-up word just because some men like to wear so-called feminine panties. A woman wearing boxers doesn't get a new weird word to use, nor is a woman condemned if she hates frills and lace. Grrr... all this stereotyping raises my bloodpressure. 

#29193
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages

Herr Uhl wrote...

ejoslin wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

ejoslin wrote...

That's Manties! God, that's my new favorite word.


I wonder what womanly thing will get to start with an m next. Magina, Movaries, Mra, Mouchebag etc. the possibilities are endless!


Mangina is NOT a new term...  But it probably doesn't mean quite what you think it would!

Edit: Hmmm, according to urban dictionary, the way I always used it is definition 7!  Hmmmmm.


That is Mangina, not magina. There is a difference. And I know all about Manginas.


*grin* I'm still trying to figure out how Mra would be pronounced! 

#29194
Sannox

Sannox
  • Members
  • 1 163 messages

ejoslin wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

ejoslin wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

ejoslin wrote...

That's Manties! God, that's my new favorite word.


I wonder what womanly thing will get to start with an m next. Magina, Movaries, Mra, Mouchebag etc. the possibilities are endless!


Mangina is NOT a new term...  But it probably doesn't mean quite what you think it would!

Edit: Hmmm, according to urban dictionary, the way I always used it is definition 7!  Hmmmmm.


That is Mangina, not magina. There is a difference. And I know all about Manginas.


*grin* I'm still trying to figure out how Mra would be pronounced! 

It sounds like something a cat would say!  (when they make that purr/miaow sound).

#29195
Guest_Elps_*

Guest_Elps_*
  • Guests

Sannox wrote...

ejoslin wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

ejoslin wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

ejoslin wrote...

That's Manties! God, that's my new favorite word.


I wonder what womanly thing will get to start with an m next. Magina, Movaries, Mra, Mouchebag etc. the possibilities are endless!


Mangina is NOT a new term...  But it probably doesn't mean quite what you think it would!

Edit: Hmmm, according to urban dictionary, the way I always used it is definition 7!  Hmmmmm.


That is Mangina, not magina. There is a difference. And I know all about Manginas.


*grin* I'm still trying to figure out how Mra would be pronounced! 

It sounds like something a cat would say!  (when they make that purr/miaow sound).


It's the noise Alistair makes when he's trying to talk with his mouth full of his stew.

#29196
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages
@Elps you make good points. Though it is FAR more acceptable in our society for a girl to be a tomboy than for a boy to be, well, I don't even think there's an equivalent word -- any description for a boy who is more feminine is very derogatory.



But I can't help it. I DO like the term "manties!"

#29197
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages

Elps wrote...

It's the noise Alistair makes when he's trying to talk with his mouth full of his stew.


Am I the only one who thought that stew wasn't really stew?

Autofellatio!

#29198
UpiH

UpiH
  • Members
  • 799 messages
Huh? I must be the weird one hereabouts. I don't particulary like porn, that's about as arousing as a NY phone book would be. I don't feel any need to peep the copulation of people akin to me. I don't feel the need for any extra gear or somesuch. A woman I love will do well enough and if there isn't any around, my imagination and memories will do the trick. I was taught human anatomy while I was 12 or so.



Fair enough, all of us always belong to some majorities and some minorities. I guess, it all comes to us being individuals. You define your environment and what you are yourself, no need to let the environment define you.

#29199
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages

UpiH wrote...

Huh? I must be the weird one hereabouts. I don't particulary like porn, that's about as arousing as a NY phone book would be. I don't feel any need to peep the copulation of people akin to me. I don't feel the need for any extra gear or somesuch. A woman I love will do well enough and if there isn't any around, my imagination and memories will do the trick. I was taught human anatomy while I was 12 or so.

Fair enough, all of us always belong to some majorities and some minorities. I guess, it all comes to us being individuals. You define your environment and what you are yourself, no need to let the environment define you.


Oh, I don't like porn either, and I'm completely into monogamy.  I just think preferences that are not quite, hmmmm, mainstream?, are not as uncommon as we think.  Nor are they portrayed accurately by the media.

#29200
Sannox

Sannox
  • Members
  • 1 163 messages

Elps wrote...

Sannox wrote...

I agree that everybody (most, anyway) has their kinks. I imagine there's a good evolutionary reason for our sexuality being so complex. I suppose that sometimes I just feel stranger than most. Most of what I read or see about sex seems to have nothing to do with me.
I'm sure I'm not the only one to feel like that though, even if it's for different reasons.
I didn't know there was such a word as 'manties'. I don't think much of 'panties', but 'manties' is even worse. Whatever happened to good old 'knickers'?


I think some folk just overthink things. Where it comes to sex and sexuality the word "normal" has only one meaning - its the cycle on a washing machine you use to wash the sheets. That is, if sheets are even involved. 
One person's idea of kink is another person's normal, everyday expression of their sexuality. When two (or more) people are on the same page and are old enough to give consent then anything they do together is right, proper, and normal.

Sorry for the rant - its just something that really gets to me. A bit like manties really - I can't see the need for a made-up word just because some men like to wear so-called feminine panties. A woman wearing boxers doesn't get a new weird word to use, nor is a woman condemned if she hates frills and lace. Grrr... all this stereotyping raises my bloodpressure. 


Well, I think there two different things there.   Yes, consensual adults and all that is right and proper - no question, and no guilt or doubt necessary.   But there is still the loneliness of having an unusual sexuality.  It's not just the difficulty of meeting suitable partners but the fact that in every book, film, story, etc., the way people do sex is not what you would do.  What they feel is not what you feel.  

(ETA: I agree about the 'manties').

Modifié par Sannox, 22 mai 2010 - 04:51 .