Arundor wrote...
I like CZ's image the best but I think this one is neat too:

i seriously gotta find this dude and sign-harass him too:bandit:
Arundor wrote...
I like CZ's image the best but I think this one is neat too:

I have to wonder: if the people holding up the first sign aren't in on it then why do they always stand there long enough for a picture? Even if they couldn't see what was on the sign why would'nt they move out of the way so that their sign could be seen?Charsen wrote...
Arundor wrote...
I like CZ's image the best but I think this one is neat too:
i seriously gotta find this dude and sign-harass him too:bandit:
Modifié par ejoslin, 13 juin 2010 - 11:47 .
Sarah1281 wrote...
I have to wonder: if the people holding up the first sign aren't in on it then why do they always stand there long enough for a picture? Even if they couldn't see what was on the sign why would'nt they move out of the way so that their sign could be seen?
And yay, page 1300.



Modifié par Charsen, 14 juin 2010 - 04:45 .
Modifié par ejoslin, 14 juin 2010 - 05:18 .
Modifié par Minaleth, 14 juin 2010 - 06:32 .

Modifié par Minaleth, 14 juin 2010 - 06:45 .
Modifié par Sannox, 14 juin 2010 - 08:07 .
Modifié par Aroihkin, 14 juin 2010 - 10:32 .
Sannox wrote...
ETA: Pictures of Zevran's tattoos - I always imagine something completely different!
Modifié par soignee, 14 juin 2010 - 10:34 .
Sarah1281 wrote...
I have to wonder: if the people holding up the first sign aren't in on it then why do they always stand there long enough for a picture? Even if they couldn't see what was on the sign why would'nt they move out of the way so that their sign could be seen?Charsen wrote...
Arundor wrote...
I like CZ's image the best but I think this one is neat too:
i seriously gotta find this dude and sign-harass him too:bandit:
And yay, page 1300.
Oh definitely, those back/shoulderblade wings are badass~Tellervo wrote...
Kaioku managed the "one true design" for me. There's a lot more ink in there than I would've imagined, but once I saw the finished product? It's far too appropriate in my mind.
Modifié par Aroihkin, 14 juin 2010 - 12:58 .
Pretty much my feelings on the whole matter, too. Except I can't draw, so figuring them out for myself is a non-trivial task. I feel like I should have some specific image in mind, though, for the sake of description, and I haven't found one to hang on to yet.Aroihkin wrote...
As for Zevran's tattoos, personally... I'm trying to avoid drawing them. I think no matter who draws them, it's going to not match for half the people who see them. And honestly, I don't have a solid mental image myself. I see most art and go "Yeah, that would work!" and move on. Open to interpretation, his ink is.
I have no doubt I'll have to sit down and draw a version for my own use, but it's not like that will be the One True Design in my head even then. I'd just do it so my own stuff is consistent with itself, aaaand that's about it.
Hmm yeah can see how it'd cause such effect. Unfortunate, and would think the critique would work better if posted on author's page or better yet, in their PMs. Oh well.Aroihkin wrote...
Edit: I used to post a lot of other people's fanart. And then the harsh crit on the pieces -- even though the artist/their friends could be lurking and didn't post the picture themselves! -- made me rage a lot. So I kind of stopped.
Aroihkin wrote...
Oh definitely, those back/shoulderblade wings are badass~Tellervo wrote...
Kaioku managed the "one true design" for me. There's a lot more ink in there than I would've imagined, but once I saw the finished product? It's far too appropriate in my mind.
Edit: I used to post a lot of other people's fanart. And then the harsh crit on the pieces -- even though the artist/their friends could be lurking and didn't post the picture themselves! -- made me rage a lot. So I kind of stopped.
I mostly just think it's pointless to post the critique where the author isn't likely to see it (because they aren't aware their stuff was posted somewhere) and doing it in public while it can be perfectly well done in private also seems to have no benefit for the author. When done in this manner (in public, on unrelated forum) it tends to become more of something done for the show and for cheap points scored with crowd of the onlookers, to demonstrate how cool and sophisticated the critic is... than actual help.soignee wrote...
You have to develop tougher skin if you're posting on the internets. Especially artwork. I understand the fragility and ego tied to it; especially if there's been a bit of a block recently and the last thing you want to hear is "the perspective is wrong" or "their face is weird."
tmp7704 wrote...
I mostly just think it's pointless to post the critique where the author isn't likely to see it (because they aren't aware their stuff was posted somewhere) and doing it in public while it can be perfectly well done in private also seems to have no benefit for the author. When done in this manner (in public, on unrelated forum) it tends to become more of something done for the show and for cheap points scored with crowd of the onlookers, to demonstrate how cool and sophisticated the critic is... than actual help.soignee wrote...
You have to develop tougher skin if you're posting on the internets. Especially artwork. I understand the fragility and ego tied to it; especially if there's been a bit of a block recently and the last thing you want to hear is "the perspective is wrong" or "their face is weird."
Modifié par soignee, 14 juin 2010 - 01:37 .
Ah totally, it's kind of the "when life hands you lemons" thing. Some of the critique is going to be genuine and some of it can be helpful to boot, and these two don't even necessarily overleap so it can be tricky to sort it out, but still better to try and sort it out than just dismiss if all automatically because it's just "someone on the intertubes said that, lol". Since it being intertubes you can rarely know if that person talking actually doesn't happen to be someone who does know what they're talking about.soignee wrote...
I agree with this, but you still have to roll with the punches.
tmp7704 wrote...
I mostly just think it's pointless to post the critique where the author isn't likely to see it (because they aren't aware their stuff was posted somewhere) and doing it in public while it can be perfectly well done in private also seems to have no benefit for the author. When done in this manner (in public, on unrelated forum) it tends to become more of something done for the show and for cheap points scored with crowd of the onlookers, to demonstrate how cool and sophisticated the critic is... than actual help.