soignee wrote...
Aroihkin wrote...
You guys are going to give me a complex, I'm seriously waiting for the next person who mentions it to be to talk about that damn crazy person on ffnet who wrote Zev liking an ugly chick and oh my god, was it terrible.
I get that about dwarves all the damn time. Especially from Alistair fangirls. So I've sort of ...stopped writing Alistair as anything other then bromance.
Alistair fangirls
frighten me. This is where I resist telling the story of Why I Left SiB on LJ, because it's only going to get me run out of this thread with torches and pitchforks, and shunned by this half of the fandom as well.

AND THEN WHAT WILL I WRITE FANFIC IN?! Certainly not my
other in-progress, other-fandom stories, of course. That would make
sense. And we can't have that from me!
Edit: It's not a judgement call on folks here, I've just learned that folks flip out easily over things I'd never expect them to flip out over, so now I expect much flipping out. AT ALL TIMES. CONSTANT FLIPPING.
Sabriana wrote...
I've
read "The Golden Key" and now I'm perma-stuck with a brain image of a
semi-naked Zevran running through Antiva. Which is definitely NOT a bad
thing, btw. Nice story, I like it. Missa is a bad, bad girl. And I don't
mean that in a bad way.
I have too, and the naked donkey lady still amuses the hell out of me. If we ever get to go to Antiva, I'd totally expect one to go running by...
Edit since things seem pretty quiet right now:
Original point re: gender thing wasn't even about gender. And there are characters that I've written or roleplayed that could
not switch gender and remain the same person, and I've liked those characters fine.
The original point was if that's the main factor when a character is made, they seem more
likely to end up as a cliche. Same thing for orientation. It's not a given that they are, I just find that stereotypical characters often look like they were built
around the thing they're being stereotypes of.
Character A was raised by his older half-sister because their shared father is kind of an evil dick. He just happens to be bisexual.
Character B is whatever the creator things a bisexual guy is, with all that other stuff added in for backstory.
I'd be
less surprised if B was more of a cliche than A, although B could turn out to be awesome and A could be a horror, all depending on the writer. There's always exceptions. Bad characters like in that jrpg though, were probably built around their "selling point" and little else. Someone like Zevran meanwhile seems to have been built around a lot of different things all at once, and his entire character doesn't seem, to me, to hinge completely on any one of these things. If he was built around one thing, it was "slave-turned-assassin", but
if so, he's one of those characters who was done well and he was certainly fleshed out well beyond that starting point.
The dude in the jrpg, meanwhile... not so much. He looks like he was built around being gay and "quirky", and anything else is ancillary.
I hope that works better. >.>
Edit 2: Since it's still quiet.

Alley and gender neutrality was brought up because I keep hearing about how she isn't the stereotypical girl OC. I hold that this was
helped by the way I made her as a character, who then just happened to turn out to be female. I didn't start out with her going "You know, I want to make a
girl who happens to be ____."
And, again, one can take "I want to make a girl who is also ____." and make a perfectly awesome character. But also again, most cliche girl characters seem to start off as "I'm going to make a
girl vampire/fairy/sparklecreature!"
It's
not a two way street; it doesn't hold that just because
you start off at that point you're going to make a cliche, but the cliches
do tend to be based around one defining
thing.
Or I could be totally wrong and blowing smoke out of my ***, I dunno! It's just my opinion!
Modifié par Aroihkin, 07 avril 2010 - 09:52 .