Aller au contenu

Photo

So Davik Kang was right all along... the Literal Indoctrination Interpretation


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
252 réponses à ce sujet

#251
The Twilight God

The Twilight God
  • Members
  • 3 083 messages
[quote]Xilizhra wrote...

The Reapers do that at the beginning of their harvests, not at the end; that's the point of the Citadel relay in the first place. After that, I doubt they'd want to bring everyone together; they do better at dividing and conquering.[/quote]
 
Incorrect. The Reapers launch a surprise attack intended to accomplish 3 things: 1.) Seize the entire mass relay network. 2.) Remove galactic leadership and 3.) Gather census data.  
 
The Reapers fought a centuries long war with the Protheans following said surpise attack; a war that coincidentally came to a close upon the introduction of the Crucible to the equation which Javik says they weren't able to complete. But he never elaborates. He wasn't even close enough to the project to know what the Catalyst was. For all he knows they did complete it. The fact that the Reapers urged their slaves to seek control indicates the Reapers were proabebly aware it existed.
 

[quote]It doesn't work against it. [/quote]
 
Of course it does. It prevents the Crucible from automatically firing and destroying the Reapers like it is designed to do.
 

[quote]Are you saying that you wouldn't put some kind of safety switch on your weapon of mass destruction to prevent it from firing the instant it docked? [/quote]
 
That is exactly what I'm saying. Given what is at stake I would want it to fire instantly. Any species building the Crucible doesn't have a choice but to use it. So why would I want to add on the additional task of needing someone inside to push a button on a device that only has one purpose and must be used?
 

[quote]And I doubt it can be on the Crucible, as the Crucible needs to release all of its energy into the Citadel to use the Citadel's relay network control to fire through every single relay.[/quote]
 
Any hypothetical switch would have to be on the Crucible, even if it was remote operated. Why would an on/off switch for an external device that is not part of the Citadel be on the Citadel? That makes no sense.
 

[quote]The plans evidently didn't include instructions on how to fire the thing, just to activate it with the Citadel. They didn't know about the Citadel interface.[/quote]
 
Of course there is no mention of a Citadel interface. The Crucible is designed to co-opt the relay controls and fire automatically. The contraption at eye level is a Reaper device designed to suppress the Crucible and use its energy to further the Reaper's goals. It has nothing to do with the Crucible's designed intent as I've already proven and you already conceeded when you didn't debunk the assertion of fact regarding my deductive analysis.
 
[quote]Why not? At least, why not in the timeframe of many thousands of years that the Reapers have? [/quote]
 
I'm not sure what is so hard about this concept to understand. You can spend a thousand years redesigning gasoline power automobiles and you will always require an exhaust. It is a non-negotiable design necessity. That particular design characteristic may be a necessity for the proper functioning of the Citadel in the same way an exhaust is necessary for a car. Or, as I hypothesized, perhaps the Reapers incorporated the Crucible as a trap. In which case they want the attacking fleet to believe they have a chance; to have a reason to stay and fight. If Vendetta tells them the Crucible needs to dock at point A and point A is no longer there the trap fails.
 

[quote]and Harbinger at the very least would still retain all necessary information about how it works. It makes no sense at all for the Reapers to leave themselves so genuinely open; the only way it would is if the Destroy function didn't actually work.[/quote]
 
You're assuming the Crucible was designed prior to Harbinger's creation. You assume the Leviathans have not advanced in over a billion years. You also assume that anything is possible just because you want to do it. You assume a lot of things. Good luck on your exhaustless car.
  

[quote]None of those are relevant to Mass Effect. I've given reasons for all of your examples.[/quote]
 
No, you've failed in that attempt. You gave no valid reasons. Just ridiculous excuses that a contradict your own logic in some cases.
 

[quote]I charge you to give one for why the Reapers would possibly allow a valid means of destroying them to continue to exist.[/quote]
 
They don't allow it. It's not in their capability to completely eradicate the design. Why did they allow the Leviathans to survive. Why did they allow Shepard to stop the Collectors? Why did Harbinger allow Shepard to live during the conduit run. Why didn't they allow anyone to use conduit vs shutting it off? These are rhetorical questions by the way. 
 

[quote]And it's not "because they never expected anyone to show up to that point," because the rest of the contraption is reliant on someone actually being there; there'd be no point for the Reapers building it at all unless they were anticipating someone to show up there.[/quote]
 
Look up the word "contingency". Maybe you're unfamiliar with the word.
 

[quote]The Crucible isn't just an indiscriminate energy blast; it's clearly being directed even after the initial firing, through the various relays.[/quote]
 
Yeah, but that has nothing to do with who it affects. That's why the Crucible needs to relay controls. To plot the most efficient course through the network and have the relays direct that course.
 

[quote]"Energy blast" is probably the wrong word in any case; I'm not entirely sure what it is, but the Crucible is able to direct it to different locations even in mid-fire[/quote]
 
That is a total lie. It expands from an epicenter in all directions. It does not specifically travel to particular places. It just hits everything that is in its path.
 

[quote]and I don't see it as less plausible that it could attack specific software configurations to ensure that all traces of the Reapers' presence would be gone. And it wouldn't have to just attack Reaper code itself; it could be tuned to just attack and destroy all signs of artificial intelligence.[/quote]
 
There is no such thing as a "sign of artificial intelligence". I have already explained why this is impossible. It's as absurd as saying the Crucible will only target people who are Knicks fans. Or stating that a wave washing up on a beach will only put out fires that were lit by matches, but not those that were lit by rubbing dry twigs. Water is water. It can't pick and chose which fires it will extinguish. Same for the Crucible. The energy is what it is. It's all or nothing.

As we see it disintegrate the husks we can only assume it disintegrates the reaper terminators. The fact that no other entities are shown to be effected tells us it targets reaper forces. And the only thing they have in common is the fact that they are synthesized. Since Edi is made from this material (from Sovereign) she dies as well. Therefore, my conclusion is that it disintegrates synthesized material.

Modifié par The Twilight God, 19 octobre 2012 - 01:44 .


#252
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

That is exactly what I'm saying. Given what is at stake I would want it to fire instantly. Any species building the Crucible doesn't have a choice but to use it. So why would I want to add on the additional task of needing someone inside to push a button on a device that only has one purpose and must be used?

So, no safeguards against it exploding upon activation, or something similar?

I'm not sure what is so hard about this concept to understand. You can spend a thousand years redesigning gasoline power automobiles and you will always require an exhaust. It is a non-negotiable design necessity. That particular design characteristic may be a necessity for the proper functioning of the Citadel in the same way an exhaust is necessary for a car. Or, as I hypothesized, perhaps the Reapers incorporated the Crucible as a trap. In which case they want the attacking fleet to believe they have a chance; to have a reason to stay and fight. If Vendetta tells them the Crucible needs to dock at point A and point A is no longer there the trap fails.

There's no need for a trap there, and there's especially no need for a trap that has a 1/3 chance of actually killing every single Reaper. It's an utterly insane risk. And while I may not be able to design an exhaustless gasoline-powered car, I can use that car's chassis and find a different power supply that doesn't require an exhaust, and use that, especially if I'd have millions of years to do it.

There is no such thing as a "sign of artificial intelligence". I have already explained why this is impossible. It's as absurd as saying the Crucible will only target people who are Knicks fans. Or stating that a wave washing up on a beach will only put out fires that were lit by matches, but not those that were lit by rubbing dry twigs. Water is water. It can't pick and chose which fires it will extinguish. Same for the Crucible. The energy is what it is. It's all or nothing.

Then you're thinking of the Crucible in a way constrained by modern science, which it's clearly not. I'm sure you'd also say Synthesis is impossible for similar reasons, but since Bioware will never canonize only your version of the ending where only one is true and all others are lies, the reduced capacity of the Crucible will only be the truth in your own little universe. Enjoy that. I suspect there's no real need to continue.

#253
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages
 Well as this thread kind of went off topic and then died, figured I might as well update my thoughts on what happened rather than start a whole new thread...

After spending ages talking to various people including the helpful IT guys, I haven't really changed my thoughts on what happened.  

-----


ENDING AS A HALLUCINATION 

Still seems like the ending was real, but it gets more and more hallucinatory as you progress towards the beam.  The nightmarish images of Ashley and Kaidan are when things go really haywire, but the whole Kaidan / Ashley deathscream when (if) Steve dies also lends itself to the idea that Shepard is having flashbacks without realising - that the memories are starting to seem like reality.

The scene on the Citadel might well be some place we've seen before (e.g. the Coucil chambers, where the control panel was before), transformed by hallucinations.  If so then either it's having a similar effect on Anderson, or Anderson is a hallucination (and then so therefore is TIM, representing good and bad consciences).  I'll leave this open for now, either could be the case.

Still think the final scene is an out-and-out hallucination, and Shepard is still where she was, back in the control room or wherever that was.  The magic elevator (which is not in the centre of the room btw) and the halo-like effect of everything blanching into white light still leave me convinced that this is pure imagination - an ascension into dreamland.

The next scene then represents Shepard's consciousness trying to make sense of the hallucination.  On the one hand, she's figuring out how the control panel has been changed via the Crucible - maybe even a VI like Avina or all the others has popped up to explain things.  But at the same time there's the inodctrination attempt happening within the Citadel itself.  Whether this is coming from the Citadel (the Intelligence), or an external force such as another Reaper, is hard to say - there's evidence for both.  

And finally there's Shepard's own thoughts getting intermingled with the lot, making Citadel controls, Shepard's mind figuring it out, and the last-minute Reaper indoctrination all become interpreted in Shepard's mind as an exchange with the Kid from her dreams.

So she's got to break free from the spell and make her own choice.  What exactly happens in each case, I'm not certain.  In Destroy we see what happens.  Either Synthesis or Control could represent her mind becoming that of the new Reaper - again there's evidence for both.  But either way, Control seems like a less drastic occurence than Synthesis - something which the galaxy could maybe recover from, making it a possibly preferable choice over Destroy in low-EMS scenarios.

----

ENDING AS A DREAM


There are some alarming pieces of evidence which could point to the whole of Priority:Earth being a trap, with the beam actually being no more than one of the Reaper constructs we've seen many times before (e.g. the thing the Geth worship on Feros).  If this were the case, then the beam doesn't go anywhere - not to the Citadel or anywhere else - and Shepard and the galaxy would seem to be doomed.  This would help explain why the hallucinations get stronger near the end, and why the ending seems so bizarre.  Note that some characters make comments possibly alluding to this idea, including Ashley who says "This doesn't even look like Earth.  Looks like... hell."

If this were the case, IT would be necessarily true.  Harbinger's blast is the last thing you'd see in the real world, and everything thereafter would have to be a dream (and possibly even some things before).  However, as this is an extremely dramatic version of events, we'd need a lot of evidence to back it up, and at the moment there doesn't seem to be enough.  The IT crowd in general do not support this idea, so I consider it to be a secondary interpretation for now.  It would be an extremely depressing ending, but if it is true, it would make sense as to why Bioware made the ending so confusing, because it would be preferable to allow players to think they'd won rather than showing all their efforts come to nothing and everybody die.  However, as there's not masses of evidence to back this one up, I'll stick to the original idea.

Modifié par Davik Kang, 08 novembre 2012 - 12:28 .