Modifié par juppeli, 30 décembre 2009 - 02:55 .
delete
Débuté par
juppeli
, déc. 30 2009 02:44
#1
Posté 30 décembre 2009 - 02:44
juppeli
-
- Members
- 4 messages
Sorry, delete this thread. I saw a bunch of these exactly the same.
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 30 décembre 2009 - 03:01
Gorath Alpha
-
- Members
- 10 605 messages
You've chosen to ignore the definition of "supported". Theoretically, the five year old Geforce 6200A has every feature and function that is being implemented, but it is horrendously slow, as is every Intel chip. Neither the 6200, nor any Intel chip, gets any support. Neither one runs the game the way it was intended to run.
Even the minimum Geforce they named, the 6600 GT, is only officially supported, but that doesn't allow the poor thing to run the game in an enjoyable manner. IMO, the practical minimum Geforce is the 7600 GT named for Vista, and a 6800 PCIe Vanilla 256 MB for XP.
There simply isn't any six year old card that can run even the first notch (Dx9.0"b") of SM3 pixel shaders.
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/58/index/128343
That's a list of various age Mainline Gaming cards in order of their performance.
Gorath
-
Even the minimum Geforce they named, the 6600 GT, is only officially supported, but that doesn't allow the poor thing to run the game in an enjoyable manner. IMO, the practical minimum Geforce is the 7600 GT named for Vista, and a 6800 PCIe Vanilla 256 MB for XP.
There simply isn't any six year old card that can run even the first notch (Dx9.0"b") of SM3 pixel shaders.
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/58/index/128343
That's a list of various age Mainline Gaming cards in order of their performance.
Gorath
-
