431 réponses à ce sujet

[Blueprotoss]

SiriusXI wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

SiriusXI wrote...

Pathetic statemnt... the ending is an insult to our Intelligence. t is so full of plotholes, makes no sense and the worst part is that you as a player can fel that the ending "thinks" it is sooo deep and that the "twist" is sooo mazing, but it is not. The ending has as much depth as an empty piece of paper.

Us not liking the ending has NOTHING to do with wanting a "happy" ending (even if I personally would prefer it). We want an ending that makes sense!

To be fair if you want to be constant when talking about plotholes then you would have to be talking about ME as a whole since ME3 doesn't contradict what was established in neither ME1 nor ME2.

Some people hated the ending because there was no true happy ending just like how some people were going to hate anything as the ending, which it sounds like you're in that group.

 

Sovereign said pretty clearly that they want to "destroy" not PRESERVE organic life in ME1. That clearly contradicts what was established in ME1

To be fair destroy has different meanings just like most words do in every language and dialect.  Also to kill someone is to destroy, which that was happening.

[Benchpress610]

[quote]Blueprotoss wrote...

[quote]SiriusXI wrote...

[quote]Blueprotoss wrote...

[quote]SiriusXI wrote...

Pathetic statemnt... the ending is an insult to our Intelligence. t is so full of plotholes, makes no sense and the worst part is that you as a player can fel that the ending "thinks" it is sooo deep and that the "twist" is sooo mazing, but it is not. The ending has as much depth as an empty piece of paper.

Us not liking the ending has NOTHING to do with wanting a "happy" ending (even if I personally would prefer it). We want an ending that makes sense![/quote]To be fair if you want to be constant when talking about plotholes then you would have to be talking about ME as a whole since ME3 doesn't contradict what was established in neither ME1 nor ME2.

Some people hated the ending because there was no true happy ending just like how some people were going to hate anything as the ending, which it sounds like you're in that group.
[/quote] 

Sovereign said pretty clearly that they want to "destroy" not PRESERVE organic life in ME1. That clearly contradicts what was established in ME1

[/quote]To be fair destroy has different meanings just like most words do in every language and dialect.  Also to kill someone is to destroy, which that was happening.[/quote]
From Merrian webster:  [/quote]
Definition of DESTROY
transitive verb

1
: to ruin the structure, organic existence, or condition of <destroyed the files>; also: to ruin as if by tearing to shreds <their reputation was destroyed>

2
a[/i]: to put out of existence : kill <destroy an injured horse>
b[/i]: neutralize <the moon destroys the light of the stars>
c[/i]: annihilate, vanquish <armies had been crippled but not destroyed— W. L. Shirer>
intransitive verb

: to cause destruction
[/quote]
Looks pretty definite to me.

[Blueprotoss]

Benchpress610 wrote...

From Merrian webster:
Definition of DESTROY
transitive verb

1
: to ruin the structure, organic existence, or condition of <destroyed the files>; also: to ruin as if by tearing to shreds <their reputation was destroyed>

2
a[/i]: to put out of existence : kill <destroy an injured horse>
b[/i]: neutralize <the moon destroys the light of the stars>
c[/i]: annihilate, vanquish <armies had been crippled but not destroyed— W. L. Shirer>
intransitive verb

: to cause destruction 

Looks pretty definite to me.

All that you have shown is really one definition of destroy and either way husks like all Reapers are dead when harvested.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 15 octobre 2012 - 12:15 .

[DavidMW]

I do not agree, The meaning of sacrifice and its effects has already been done in the two previous ME's and numerous times through out 3. I don't need someone telling me "I missed the point", I understood the point of the ending. Speculation baby!

[Benchpress610]

Blueprotoss wrote...

Benchpress610 wrote...

From Merrian webster:
Definition of DESTROY
transitive verb

1
: to ruin the structure, organic existence, or condition of <destroyed the files>; also: to ruin as if by tearing to shreds <their reputation was destroyed>

2
a[/i]: to put out of existence : kill <destroy an injured horse>
b[/i]: neutralize <the moon destroys the light of the stars>
c[/i]: annihilate, vanquish <armies had been crippled but not destroyed— W. L. Shirer>
intransitive verb

: to cause destruction 

Looks pretty definite to me.

All that you have shown is really one definition of destroy and either way husks like all Reapers are dead when harvested.

Perhaps you didn't read the whole piece or didn’t comprehend it. This is from Merriam Webster and there are two definitions with variants. It doesn’t leave room for conjecture as it is clearly defined.
 If you have a credible source with another definition, I’d love to see it.

[Blueprotoss]

Benchpress610 wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

Benchpress610 wrote...

From Merrian webster:
Definition of DESTROY
transitive verb

1
: to ruin the structure, organic existence, or condition of <destroyed the files>; also: to ruin as if by tearing to shreds <their reputation was destroyed>

2
a[/i]: to put out of existence : kill <destroy an injured horse>
b[/i]: neutralize <the moon destroys the light of the stars>
c[/i]: annihilate, vanquish <armies had been crippled but not destroyed— W. L. Shirer>
intransitive verb

: to cause destruction 

Looks pretty definite to me.

All that you have shown is really one definition of destroy and either way husks like all Reapers are dead when harvested.

Perhaps you didn't read the whole piece or didn’t comprehend it. This is from Merriam Webster and there are two definitions with variants. It doesn’t leave room for conjecture as it is clearly defined.
 If you have a credible source with another definition, I’d love to see it.

I see you're tryiing to resort to logic fallacies even when a simple definition for destroy can be death since parts of your body will shutdown.  Btw inuslting people is still a bad move.

[jakal66]

Oh man all I know is that NERDS will be NERDS!!!!hahaha just kindding....



... not really :-P