Yes.ediskrad327 wrote...
so it's better to just let them walk away and exterminate the cycle?LiarasShield wrote...
Because I still saw it as shepard fighting against the reapers and not siding with them to find a solution that they wanted to have happended or offered
Why Did I Choose Refuse You Say?
Débuté par
LiarasShield
, oct. 13 2012 04:43
#201
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 06:17
Humanoid_Typhoon
-
- Members
- 4 735 messages
Retour en haut
#202
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 06:18
The Twilight God
-
- Members
- 3 083 messages
frostajulie wrote...
ME1 and ME2 BOTH said you were up against impossible odds and in both games you win.ME3 should have been NO different.
You do win if you destroy the Reapers. ME3 is no different. Just getting to the Citadel was supposedly impossible. So don't give me that BS. Hackett is fighting the war. He KNOWS we are losing. He doesn't THINK we are losing. It IS happening. We ARE losing. And you KNOW this. You can lie to yourself and look like a loon all you want, but you KNOW you're full of sh*t. You can no more think conventional victory was possible than you could think water is dry and fire is wet.
You reveal the real reason you choose to delude yourself. You WANT a different ending. Tough. You're not getting a conventional victory. Deal with it.
#203
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 06:18
ediskrad327
-
- Members
- 4 031 messages
i don't see the logic there...Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...
Yes.ediskrad327 wrote...
so it's better to just let them walk away and exterminate the cycle?LiarasShield wrote...
Because I still saw it as shepard fighting against the reapers and not siding with them to find a solution that they wanted to have happended or offered
#204
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 06:32
The Twilight God
-
- Members
- 3 083 messages
Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...
Yes.ediskrad327 wrote...
so it's better to just let them walk away and exterminate the cycle?LiarasShield wrote...
Because I still saw it as shepard fighting against the reapers and not siding with them to find a solution that they wanted to have happended or offered
Even though Destroy is not siding with them and is, in fact, the very antithesis to their entire plan.
1. The demise of the Reapers does not in any way, shape or form compromise with the Kid.
2. The demise of the Intelligence does not in any way, shape or form compromise with the Kid.
3. The end of the Cycle of Extinction does not in any way, shape or form compromise with the Kid.
4. The freedom to self-determinate does not any way, shape or form compromise with the Kid.
5. The continued coexistence of synthetics and organics does not in any way, shape or form compromise with the Kid.
In no way is Destroy siding with the Reapers. The Geth dying is your personal delusion which is based on absolutely nothing said or shown in the game.
#205
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 06:33
The Twilight God
-
- Members
- 3 083 messages
ediskrad327 wrote...
i don't see the logic there...Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...
Yes.ediskrad327 wrote...
so it's better to just let them walk away and exterminate the cycle?LiarasShield wrote...
Because I still saw it as shepard fighting against the reapers and not siding with them to find a solution that they wanted to have happended or offered
None to be seen.
#206
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 06:40
Humanoid_Typhoon
-
- Members
- 4 735 messages
I suppose I just felt like saying yes, or being handed a killswitch to my enemy, by my enemy , seems fishy to me.The Twilight God wrote...
ediskrad327 wrote...
i don't see the logic there...Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...
Yes.ediskrad327 wrote...
so it's better to just let them walk away and exterminate the cycle?LiarasShield wrote...
Because I still saw it as shepard fighting against the reapers and not siding with them to find a solution that they wanted to have happended or offered
None to be seen.
#207
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 06:52
AlanC9
-
- Members
- 35 744 messages
Thinking your alternative "seems fishy" isn't a great reason for choosing a path that leads to certain destruction
#208
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 07:06
Humanoid_Typhoon
-
- Members
- 4 735 messages
Well certainly with that logic jumping into to random beams of energy or blowing up a tube is are much more viaible options.AlanC9 wrote...
Thinking your alternative "seems fishy" isn't a great reason for choosing a path that leads to certain destruction
#209
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 07:19
Bill Casey
-
- Members
- 7 609 messages
I love how the Reaper King talked you out of using the crucible to destroy the reapers...
It deserves some kind of award for that...
It deserves some kind of award for that...
Modifié par Bill Casey, 14 octobre 2012 - 07:24 .
#210
Guest_DirtyMouthSally_*
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 07:51
Guest_DirtyMouthSally_*
Guest_DirtyMouthSally_*
-
- Guests
We're getting caught up in semantics. I'm not cherry picking anything. You're confusing me with others in this thread that have stated "why they refused". I've participated in the thread, but I haven't stated any choices that I've made in the game, or which one I actually prefer over the other.The Twilight God wrote...
DirtyMouthSally wrote...
I remembered what the Catalyst said, but that was the original ending. At most all you can say now is that some synthetics may or most likely will perish. If those quotes you gave are accurate, then anything beyond that is speculation.
Most likely will perish? There is no distinction made between AI and any other technology. If you're going to say some AI or most will perish the same has to apply to ALL OTHER TECHNOLOGY because no distinction is made. You cannot cherry pick one particular subset and say that group will perish, but all the others who are ALL included in "technology you rely on" are exempt. Geth don't even really fit that description.
I said synthetics, not AI. Something that is produced and not organic, or at least that's what I meant.
Yes, saying some may or most likely will perish, is a fairly reasonable interpretation of what may happen if the catalyst says:
"But be warned: others will be destroyed as well. The Crucible will not discriminate. All synthetics will be targeted. Even you are partly synthetic..."
Although granted that interpretation is putting it a little lightly. You could say that some will indeed perish, going literally by the quote.
Modifié par DirtyMouthSally, 14 octobre 2012 - 07:56 .
#211
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 07:58
XxDarkTimexX
-
- Members
- 431 messages
no refuse and destroy is the only two good opintions, control the reapers but after a few years or so the cycle begins againbabachewie wrote...
You choose refuse because you didnt pay attention to the story. Refuse is the dumbest choice in the game.
#212
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:10
Jadebaby
-
- Members
- 13 229 messages
LiarasShield wrote...
1 Because I still saw it as shepard fighting against the reapers and not siding with them to find a solution that they wanted to have happended or offered
2 Because bioware didn't allow me to have the ending that I have in my signature
3 Because only the brave die young.
4 Because of Shepard's **** you speech. (epic!)
5 Because girls are always right
#213
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:11
Jadebaby
-
- Members
- 13 229 messages
babachewie wrote...
You choose refuse because you didnt pay attention to the story. Refuse is the dumbest choice in the game.
lol @ you if you chose control or synthesis.
#214
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:13
ATiBotka
-
- Members
- 1 008 messages
Jade8aby88 wrote...
LiarasShield wrote...
1 Because I still saw it as shepard fighting against the reapers and not siding with them to find a solution that they wanted to have happended or offered
2 Because bioware didn't allow me to have the ending that I have in my signature
3 Because only the brave die young.
4 Because of Shepard's **** you speech. (epic!)
5 Because girls are always right
I've always hated that speech.
#215
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:13
ATiBotka
-
- Members
- 1 008 messages
Jade8aby88 wrote...
babachewie wrote...
You choose refuse because you didnt pay attention to the story. Refuse is the dumbest choice in the game.
lol @ you if you chose control or synthesis.
Because Control and Synthesis are bad, and you should feel bad.
#216
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:15
XxDarkTimexX
-
- Members
- 431 messages
Mass Effect 3 might have four choices, but in real life you have endless amount of choices to choose from rather you can see it or not they are still there and thats why i hate the choices at the end
#217
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:16
Jadebaby
-
- Members
- 13 229 messages
ATiBotka wrote...
I've always hated that speech.
wow I didn't think people like you existed.
ATiBotka wrote...
Because Control and Synthesis are bad, and you should feel bad.
If you paid attention to the story, why yes. Yes they are.
#218
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:18
XxDarkTimexX
-
- Members
- 431 messages
because your chocies though out the mass effect trilogy don't fu*king matter at all at the endXxDarkTimexX wrote...
Mass Effect 3 might have four choices, but in real life you have endless amount of choices to choose from rather you can see it or not they are still there and thats why i hate the choices at the end
#219
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:23
ATiBotka
-
- Members
- 1 008 messages
Jade8aby88 wrote...
ATiBotka wrote...
Because Control and Synthesis are bad, and you should feel bad.
If you paid attention to the story, why yes. Yes they are.
Because indoctrination.
#220
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:27
Jadebaby
-
- Members
- 13 229 messages
ATiBotka wrote...
Jade8aby88 wrote...
ATiBotka wrote...
Because Control and Synthesis are bad, and you should feel bad.
If you paid attention to the story, why yes. Yes they are.
Because indoctrination.
No.
#221
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:30
ATiBotka
-
- Members
- 1 008 messages
Jade8aby88 wrote...
ATiBotka wrote...
Jade8aby88 wrote...
ATiBotka wrote...
Because Control and Synthesis are bad, and you should feel bad.
If you paid attention to the story, why yes. Yes they are.
Because indoctrination.
No.
Because TIM wanted to Control them?
#222
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:31
XxDarkTimexX
-
- Members
- 431 messages
ATiBotka wrote...
Jade8aby88 wrote...
ATiBotka wrote...
Because Control and Synthesis are bad, and you should feel bad.
If you paid attention to the story, why yes. Yes they are.
Because indoctrination.
You know what’s funny throughout history people get laugh at for their beliefs or what they make, so i don't give a **** about that you and a lot of people think indoctrinaion is Bullsh*t
#223
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 08:39
XxDarkTimexX
-
- Members
- 431 messages
ATiBotka wrote...
Jade8aby88 wrote...
but i understand your opinionsATiBotka wrote...
Jade8aby88 wrote...
ATiBotka wrote...
Because Control and Synthesis are bad, and you should feel bad.
If you paid attention to the story, why yes. Yes they are.
Because indoctrination.
No.
Because TIM wanted to Control them?
#224
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:10
The Twilight God
-
- Members
- 3 083 messages
Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...
I suppose I just felt like saying yes, or being handed a killswitch to my enemy, by my enemy , seems fishy to me.The Twilight God wrote...
ediskrad327 wrote...
i don't see the logic there...Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...
Yes.ediskrad327 wrote...
so it's better to just let them walk away and exterminate the cycle?LiarasShield wrote...
Because I still saw it as shepard fighting against the reapers and not siding with them to find a solution that they wanted to have happended or offered
None to be seen.
Super. Shoot the power conduit and if it doesn't work call EDI. The fact that you can't call her from the start is pretty lame.
#225
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:10
Necrotron
-
- Members
- 2 315 messages
Eh, I just shut the *darn* game off at the end. There is no point in picking any choice when the story is shot to heck at that point.
