Positive Reasons to choose Destroy
#176
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:31
#177
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:34
iakus wrote...
A chance to warn EDI, so she could prepare for death, maybe say goodbye
to Joker, would have been both much more emotional, and in a sense,
much more cathartic.
She could prepare to death in a few seconds? Don't be silly. Like I said, those conversations on the Normandy were a better way to warn, prepare her for such a case. She could say goodbye to Joker before the final battle as well. Just in case, you know. Thanks to that previous conversations.
iakus wrote...
Not guilty. But responsible, yes.
But Tali wasn't on the quarian fleet. She's next to Shepard. Letting Legion upload the code (whom both you and tali can warn the quarians about) and the subsequent destruction of the quarians does not endanger Tali. She kills herself. And Shepard can try (and fail) to stop her.
in the case of the Destroy ending, the Catalyst tells SHepard that the blast will target all synthetic life. And Shepard can do nothing to warn EDI or the geth.
How would you feel when you'd be standing next to a person who just decided to ally with your enemy and as a result all humans were dead?
Modifié par Sonashi, 14 octobre 2012 - 09:34 .
#178
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:34
The Crucible doesn't make a lot of sense in general. I find the "magically infusing all life with circuitry and vise versa" thing a much bigger hurdle to jump over. Like, do the geth have lungs now?MegaSovereign wrote...
Number 4 and 8 I have problems with.
To me Destroy makes the least amount of sense. How does the Crucible distinguish synthetic life from synthetic tech?
As for your question, I think it would make MORE sense if the Crucible was designed to eliminate anything with Reaper coding (not just tech in general). It's a logical measure if you want to make sure the Reapers are dead and gone for good, and EDI and the Geth both have abundant Reaper bits. But as it is, an AI is significantly more advanced than, say, an iPod. The blast may target technology only at a certain level of complexity or higher. I don't really know how the hell that would work, but nobody knows how the Crucible works (which is very cheap on BW's part).
Control just... feels wierd. It's the one thing in the series you were told over and over not to do, the one thing that over and over resulted in disaster. Yes, it was demonstrated that an organic mind could exert control over synthetic minds in Project Overlord, so this is more an issue with narrative/theme inconsistency than it is with technological possibility.
You underestimate my ability to deny reality. But seriously, though, I would have been okay with EDI dying if I got the opportunity to ask her about it and find out if she was okay with it. It feels wrong to do that sort of thing behind her back, and it feels wrong to wipe out the geth when they finally gained their independence.EDI is definitely dead, with the Geth I guess you can headcanon them as alive but I hate headcanoning.
However, I'm even more uncomfortable with removing the entire galaxy's free will and individuality, and I simply can't buy Control as a legitimate solution. Like, what if the Catalyst is simply trying to lure you into repeating TIM's mistake? Plus, as cool as it would be to become a machine god, it seems to defy everything my Shepard(s) stand for.
In the end, it just feels like sacrificing EDI and the Geth was needlessly tacked on in order to make Destruction less desirable. It would be a different story if I had their consent.
#179
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:38
No. Synthetics only gained perfection through understanding.The Crucible doesn't make a lot of sense in general. I find the "magically infusing all life with circuitry and vise versa" thing a much bigger hurdle to jump over. Like, do the geth have lungs now?
Also, Sanctuary was successful on the Reaper ground forces themselves. Not to mention the precedent of Leviathan artifacts. And Control only resulted in disaster once, with TIM personally; Saren just gave up and went for submission right away. Control isn't that thematically inconsistent.Control just... feels wierd. It's the one thing in the series you were told over and over not to do, the one thing that over and over resulted in disaster. Yes, it was demonstrated that an organic mind could exert control over synthetic minds in Project Overlord, so this is more an issue with narrative/theme inconsistency than it is with technological possibility.
My Shepard stood for the preservation of life. If becoming a machine god is the best way to do that, then I'll do it without hesitation. And I did.However, I'm even more uncomfortable with removing the entire galaxy's free will and individuality, and I simply can't buy Control as a legitimate solution. Like, what if the Catalyst is simply trying to lure you into repeating TIM's mistake? Plus, as cool as it would be to become a machine god, it seems to defy everything my Shepard(s) stand for.
Also, I need the Reapers to keep Wrex in check.
#180
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:39
The thing with Geth&EDI is that it's the sacrifice people completely didn't consider. I suppose 90% people here, myself included were ready for Shep's death, not Geth's or EDI's.
Anyway, to be honest it makes sense for me that Crucible targets AIs and sophisticated technology, as our cycle is supposed to be the only one to achieve peace with Synthetics. All others were supposed to be more or less at war with them.
#181
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:40
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
This is why it would have made more sense for controlling the geth to be an option rather than controlling the Reapers. It would have provided a viable way for a Renegade Shepard to gain the extra fleet as well.AdmiralCheez wrote...
Control just... feels wierd. It's the one thing in the series you were told over and over not to do, the one thing that over and over resulted in disaster. Yes, it was demonstrated that an organic mind could exert control over synthetic minds in Project Overlord, so this is more an issue with narrative/theme inconsistency than it is with technological possibility.
#182
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:41
AdmiralCheez wrote...
*snip*
Holy s*** Cheez you're back. Welcome back! It's been a crazy (?) months.
BTW I don't know if you know this already, but the Omega DLC is going to have a female turian squadmate. Just felt like dropping that bombshell.
Modifié par Arcadian Legend, 14 octobre 2012 - 09:42 .
#183
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:42
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
It was confirmed to be a squadmate? I did not know this.Arcadian Legend wrote...
AdmiralCheez wrote...
*snip*
Holy s*** Cheez you're back. Welcome back! It's been a crazy _ months.
BTW I don't know if you know this already, but the Omega DLC is going to have a female turian squadmate. Just felt like dropping that bombshell.
#184
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:42
I tend to have bursts of activity about once a month.Arcadian Legend wrote...
Holy s*** Cheez you're back. Welcome back! It's been a crazy (?) months.
I know. And I'm squeeing.BTW I don't know if you know this already, but the Omega DLC is going to have a female turian squadmate. Just felt like dropping that bombshell.
#185
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:45
Xilizhra wrote...
Also, I need the Reapers to keep Wrex in check.
I must admit, Cotrol fits to you very well. You don't mind controlling a living creatures.
Next, you'll be keeping Turians in check, then Asari, then Salarians, Drells, Hanars etc. and finally Humans because they will be dangerous as well. The real Catalyst is here
#186
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:45
AdmiralCheez wrote...
I tend to have bursts of activity about once a month.Arcadian Legend wrote...
Holy s*** Cheez you're back. Welcome back! It's been a crazy (?) months.I know. And I'm squeeing.BTW I don't know if you know this already, but the Omega DLC is going to have a female turian squadmate. Just felt like dropping that bombshell.
I put it down to my poor timing on things like these. And that makes sense considering you changed your sig.
Modifié par Arcadian Legend, 14 octobre 2012 - 09:46 .
#187
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:47
Guest_Arcian_*
Wat.Arcadian Legend wrote...
AdmiralCheez wrote...
*snip*
Holy s*** Cheez you're back. Welcome back! It's been a crazy (?) months.
BTW I don't know if you know this already, but the Omega DLC is going to have a female turian squadmate. Just felt like dropping that bombshell.
Is this for real?
#188
Guest_Logan Cloud_*
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:47
Guest_Logan Cloud_*
BSN 'tis a small world.
#189
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:48
[quote]iakus wrote...
A chance to warn EDI, so she could prepare for death, maybe say goodbye
to Joker, would have been both much more emotional, and in a sense,
much more cathartic.[/quote]
She could prepare to death in a few seconds? Don't be silly. Like I said, those conversations on the Normandy were a better way to warn, prepare her for such a case. She could say goodbye to Joker before the final battle as well. Just in case, you know. Thanks to that previous conversations.[/quote]
I don't know about EDI, but for the play, most certainly.
[quote]iakus wrote...
Not guilty. But responsible, yes.
But Tali wasn't on the quarian fleet. She's next to Shepard. Letting Legion upload the code (whom both you and tali can warn the quarians about) and the subsequent destruction of the quarians does not endanger Tali. She kills herself. And Shepard can try (and fail) to stop her.
in the case of the Destroy ending, the Catalyst tells SHepard that the blast will target all synthetic life. And Shepard can do nothing to warn EDI or the geth.
[/quote]
How would you feel when you'd be standing next to a person who just decided to ally with your enemy and as a result all humans were dead?
[/quote]
It's still Tali's choice, not Shepard's. Shepard doesn't shoot her. And can, in fact, try to save her. Yes,having your choice doom the quarians is an awful one. But it is something you can warn them about beforehand, even if they don't listen.
#190
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:48
Cthulhu42 wrote...
This is why it would have made more sense for controlling the geth to be an option rather than controlling the Reapers. It would have provided a viable way for a Renegade Shepard to gain the extra fleet as well.
That would mean Renegade would no longer be "Failure" and that's not what EAware was going for.
Modifié par Seboist, 14 octobre 2012 - 09:49 .
#191
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:50
Xilizhra wrote...
My Shepard stood for the preservation of life. If becoming a machine god is the best way to do that, then I'll do it without hesitation. And I did.
Preserve life at any cost?
#192
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:50
Okay, I admit it, the geth would probably say no. Maybe I'll wind up going with Control as more information is made available.LilLino wrote...
Having their consent to kill their species? Honestly I agree with most of the things you say here, Admiral, but this is bullcrap and would be extremely out of place.
Which is why it came across as a nasty curveball. I know it's supposed to be a war story and blah blah blah, but haven't we worked hard enough for a nice, triumphant, genocide-free ending?The thing with Geth&EDI is that it's the sacrifice people completely didn't consider. I suppose 90% people here, myself included were ready for Shep's death, not Geth's or EDI's.
Ooh, wait. Does eliminating the Reapers count as genocide?
Same here. It's looking like Synthetis is the one that really has no basis in the canon.Anyway, to be honest it makes sense for me that Crucible targets AIs and sophisticated technology, as our cycle is supposed to be the only one to achieve peace with Synthetics. All others were supposed to be more or less at war with them.
#193
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:52
Do they fight to the death?
Do they side with the Reapers again?
#194
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:53
Yes. Or at the very, very least, we'll get to see said female turian.Arcian wrote...
Wat.Arcadian Legend wrote...
AdmiralCheez wrote...
*snip*
Holy s*** Cheez you're back. Welcome back! It's been a crazy (?) months.
BTW I don't know if you know this already, but the Omega DLC is going to have a female turian squadmate. Just felt like dropping that bombshell.
Is this for real?
#195
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:53
Arcian wrote...
Wat.
Is this for real?
Very real. Though whether she's a temp or permanent we don't know yet. Aria's another guest squaddie, obviously.
http://social.biowar.../index/14471763
#196
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:54
Each mission has to be coded with selectable squadmates in mind...
Why Javik, Zaeed and Kasumi had to be partially on the disc...
Modifié par Bill Casey, 14 octobre 2012 - 09:58 .
#197
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:58
AdmiralCheez wrote...
As for your question, I think it would make MORE sense if the Crucible was designed to eliminate anything with Reaper coding (not just tech in general). It's a logical measure if you want to make sure the Reapers are dead and gone for good, and EDI and the Geth both have abundant Reaper bits. But as it is, an AI is significantly more advanced than, say, an iPod. The blast may target technology only at a certain level of complexity or higher. I don't really know how the hell that would work, but nobody knows how the Crucible works (which is very cheap on BW's part).
Control just... feels wierd. It's the one thing in the series you were told over and over not to do, the one thing that over and over resulted in disaster. Yes, it was demonstrated that an organic mind could exert control over synthetic minds in Project Overlord, so this is more an issue with narrative/theme inconsistency than it is with technological possibility.
I've tried to figure out the logistics of the Crucible for a long time now. I read some other thread that mentions the Crucible's energy having nano-machines that distinguishes synthetics from organics. Still doesn't explain how it can distinguish VIs from AIs. Unless ofcourse the Crucible can magically tell whether a Synthetic Intelligence is capable of adaptive coding. Meh.
The theme behind Control is that organics can't control synthetics. However the Control ending works for me because an organic isn't controlling the Reapers...The Crucible creates a new synthetic intelligence based off of Shepard to control the Reapers. Also the logistics behind the Control functionality makes much more sense to me. It's like a massive software update distributed through the mass relays.
#198
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 09:59
AdmiralCheez wrote...
7. You get to go out shooting. For a lot of my Shepards, this is important.
.
This one makes me curious, why do you like this? I think the cutscene of Shepard choosing destroy is incredibly dull (shooting a tube? Really? Zzzzz), synthesis is also way too passive.
Control is the only ending where the scene of taking it has any punch to it.
#199
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 10:00
iakus wrote...
It's still Tali's choice, not Shepard's. Shepard doesn't shoot her. And can, in fact, try to save her. Yes,having your choice doom the quarians is an awful one. But it is something you can warn them about beforehand, even if they don't listen.
All right then, please do a playthrough when you side with the Geths and tell me If you won't feel like an ass okay? About the rest of the Quarians - Shepard warned them before, even in ME 2. It's their admirals fault that Quarian civilians died. I just couldn't stand that it was Shepard fault regardless.
#200
Posté 14 octobre 2012 - 10:01
Totalitarianism for everyone!Sonashi wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Also, I need the Reapers to keep Wrex in check.
I must admit, Cotrol fits to you very well. You don't mind controlling a living creatures.
Next, you'll be keeping Turians in check, then Asari, then Salarians, Drells, Hanars etc. and finally Humans because they will be dangerous as well. The real Catalyst is here





Retour en haut






